Spurr G B, Prentice A M, Murgatroyd P R, Goldberg G R, Reina J C, Christman N T
Department of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Am J Clin Nutr. 1988 Sep;48(3):552-9. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/48.3.552.
Total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) and energy expended in activity (EAC) were estimated by the minute-by-minute heart-rate method in 22 (16 men, 6 women) individually calibrated subjects and compared with values obtained by whole-body indirect calorimetry. Subjects followed four activity protocols during the 22 h in the calorimeter; no exercise (n = 6) and 2 (n = 5), 4 (n = 4), and 6 (n = 6) 30-min bouts of exercise on a bicycle ergometer at varying intensities. There were no statistically significant differences between the two methods in TDEE or EAC in any of the sex or protocol groupings. The regression of TDEE by heart rate on TDEE in the calorimeter was y = 0.92x + 1.0 MJ; (r = 0.87, SEE = 0.91 MJ). The heart-rate method also follows the varying activity patterns of individuals and can be used to closely estimate the TDEE and EAC of even small (n = 4-6) groups of subjects. In the present measurements, it gave a maximum error of TDEE for individuals of +20% and -15%.
采用逐分钟心率法对22名(16名男性,6名女性)经过个体校准的受试者的每日总能量消耗(TDEE)和活动能量消耗(EAC)进行了估算,并与全身间接量热法获得的值进行了比较。受试者在量热计中22小时内遵循四种活动方案;不运动(n = 6)以及在自行车测力计上进行2次(n = 5)、4次(n = 4)和6次(n = 6)不同强度的30分钟运动。在任何性别或方案分组中,两种方法在TDEE或EAC方面均无统计学显著差异。量热计中通过心率得出的TDEE与TDEE的回归方程为y = 0.92x + 1.0 MJ;(r = 0.87,标准误 = 0.91 MJ)。心率法也能追踪个体的不同活动模式,甚至可用于精确估算小群体(n = 4 - 6)受试者的TDEE和EAC。在本次测量中,个体TDEE的最大误差为+20%和 - 15%。