• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling Factor Analysis of the UCLA Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index for DSM-5 in a Polyvictimized Sample of Adolescents.对遭受多重创伤的青少年样本中用于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版的加州大学洛杉矶分校创伤后应激障碍反应指数进行贝叶斯结构方程模型因子分析。
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2021 Mar;43(1):119-130. doi: 10.1007/s10862-020-09854-z. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
2
UCLA PTSD reaction index for DSM-5 (PTSD-RI-5): a psychometric study of adolescents sampled from communities in eleven countries.加州大学洛杉矶分校《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍反应指数(PTSD-RI-5):对来自11个国家社区的青少年进行的心理测量学研究
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 May 7;10(1):1605282. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1605282. eCollection 2019.
3
Network Analysis of PTSD Symptoms in a Sample of Polyvictimized Youth.多重受害青年样本中创伤后应激障碍症状的网络分析
J Trauma Dissociation. 2021 Oct 18:1-15. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2021.1989115.
4
The best of two worlds: Combining the DSM-5 and ICD-11 clusters of symptoms for posttraumatic stress disorder in a single screening scale.两个世界的最佳结合:在单个筛查量表中结合 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍症状群。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2023 Sep-Oct;45(5):423-430. doi: 10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3143. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
5
A factor analytic investigation of DSM-5 PTSD symptoms in a culturally diverse sample of refugees resettled in Australia.对定居澳大利亚的文化多元难民样本中《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版创伤后应激障碍症状的因素分析调查。
Confl Health. 2018 May 23;12:26. doi: 10.1186/s13031-018-0155-z. eCollection 2018.
6
Polyvictimization, Emotion Dysregulation, Symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, and Behavioral Health Problems among Justice-Involved Youth: a Latent Class Analysis.涉法青少年中的多重受害、情绪调节障碍、创伤后应激障碍症状和行为健康问题:潜在类别分析。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2019 Feb;47(2):287-298. doi: 10.1007/s10802-018-0431-9.
7
Feasibility and psychometric properties of the UCLA PTSD reaction index for DSM-5 in japanese youth: A multi-site study.DSM-5 下 UCLA 创伤后应激反应指数在日本青少年中的可行性和心理计量特性:一项多地点研究。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2018 Mar;33:93-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
8
PTSD prevalence and symptom structure of DSM-5 criteria in adolescents and young adults surviving the 2011 shooting in Norway.DSM-5 标准下挪威 2011 年枪击事件幸存者青少年和青年人群 PTSD 患病率和症状结构。
J Affect Disord. 2014 Dec;169:40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.06.055. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
9
Screening for PTSD among detained adolescents: Implications of the changes in the DSM-5.被拘留青少年中创伤后应激障碍的筛查:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版变化的影响
Psychol Trauma. 2017 Jan;9(1):10-17. doi: 10.1037/tra0000156. Epub 2016 May 23.
10
Psychometric properties of the UCLA PTSD reaction index. part II: investigating factor structure findings in a national clinic-referred youth sample.UCLA 创伤后应激反应指数的心理测量特性。第二部分:在全国临床转介的青年样本中调查因素结构研究结果。
J Trauma Stress. 2013 Feb;26(1):10-8. doi: 10.1002/jts.21755.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric Assessment of the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-5 Brief Form in a Clinical Sample of Turkish Youth.针对土耳其青年临床样本的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版简版加州大学洛杉矶分校创伤后应激障碍反应指数的心理测量评估。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1007/s10578-025-01905-4.
2
Polyvictimization Profiles and Variations in Youth Mental Health Symptoms: A Person-Centered Approach.青少年心理健康症状中的多重受害概况与差异:一种以人为本的方法。
Child Maltreat. 2025 Apr 16:10775595251334115. doi: 10.1177/10775595251334115.
3
Psychometric evaluation of the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index (PTSD RI-5) in a Turkish Clinical sample of trauma-exposed children.对土耳其受创伤儿童临床样本进行的加州大学洛杉矶分校创伤后应激障碍反应指数(PTSD RI - 5)的心理测量评估。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2465082. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2465082. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
4
Posttraumatic stress disorder in disaster-exposed youth: examining diagnostic concordance and model fit using ICD-11 and DSM-5 criteria.受灾青少年的创伤后应激障碍:使用国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)标准检查诊断一致性和模型拟合度
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Jan 11;25(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05317-6.
5
Psychometric Properties of the Parent-Report Version of the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-5.适用于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版的加州大学洛杉矶分校创伤后应激障碍反应指数家长报告版的心理测量特性。
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2021 Sep 20;15(3):627-637. doi: 10.1007/s40653-021-00406-5. eCollection 2022 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
A network analysis of posttraumatic stress disorder and dissociation in trauma-exposed adolescents.创伤后应激障碍和创伤暴露青少年分离的网络分析。
J Anxiety Disord. 2020 May;72:102222. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102222. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
2
A Network Approach to Studying the Associations Between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms and Dissociative Experiences.一种研究创伤后应激障碍症状与分离体验之间关联的网络方法。
J Trauma Stress. 2020 Feb;33(1):19-28. doi: 10.1002/jts.22488. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
3
The UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-5 Brief Form: A Screening Tool for Trauma-Exposed Youths.《加州大学洛杉矶分校DSM-5简版创伤后应激障碍反应指数:一种针对经历创伤青少年的筛查工具》
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;59(3):434-443. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
4
UCLA PTSD reaction index for DSM-5 (PTSD-RI-5): a psychometric study of adolescents sampled from communities in eleven countries.加州大学洛杉矶分校《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍反应指数(PTSD-RI-5):对来自11个国家社区的青少年进行的心理测量学研究
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 May 7;10(1):1605282. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1605282. eCollection 2019.
5
Validation of the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-5: A Developmentally Informed Assessment Tool for Youth.DSM-5 下 UCLA PTSD 反应指数的验证:一个面向青年的发展性知情评估工具。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;59(1):186-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.10.019. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
6
Toward an Empirically Based Developmental Trauma Disorder Diagnosis for Children: Factor Structure, Item Characteristics, Reliability, and Validity of the Developmental Trauma Disorder Semi-Structured Interview.迈向儿童基于实证的发育创伤障碍诊断:发育创伤障碍半结构式访谈的因子结构、项目特征、信度和效度。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 11;79(5):17m11675. doi: 10.4088/JCP.17m11675.
7
Developmental timing of polyvictimization: Continuity, change, and association with adverse outcomes in adolescence.多 victimization 的发展时间:连续性、变化及其与青少年不良后果的关联。
Child Abuse Negl. 2019 Jan;87:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.07.022. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
8
Polyvictimization, Emotion Dysregulation, Symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, and Behavioral Health Problems among Justice-Involved Youth: a Latent Class Analysis.涉法青少年中的多重受害、情绪调节障碍、创伤后应激障碍症状和行为健康问题:潜在类别分析。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2019 Feb;47(2):287-298. doi: 10.1007/s10802-018-0431-9.
9
Selecting the "Best" Factor Structure and Moving Measurement Validation Forward: An Illustration.选择“最佳”因子结构并推进测量验证:一个实例。
J Pers Assess. 2018 Jul-Aug;100(4):345-362. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1449116. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
10
Feasibility and psychometric properties of the UCLA PTSD reaction index for DSM-5 in japanese youth: A multi-site study.DSM-5 下 UCLA 创伤后应激反应指数在日本青少年中的可行性和心理计量特性:一项多地点研究。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2018 Mar;33:93-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Mar 3.

对遭受多重创伤的青少年样本中用于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版的加州大学洛杉矶分校创伤后应激障碍反应指数进行贝叶斯结构方程模型因子分析。

A Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling Factor Analysis of the UCLA Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index for DSM-5 in a Polyvictimized Sample of Adolescents.

作者信息

Modrowski Crosby A, Munion Ascher K, Kerig Patricia K, Kilshaw Robyn E

机构信息

Alpert Medical School of Brown University/Bradley Hasbro Children's Research Center.

University of Utah, Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2021 Mar;43(1):119-130. doi: 10.1007/s10862-020-09854-z. Epub 2021 Jan 2.

DOI:10.1007/s10862-020-09854-z
PMID:34149159
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8210953/
Abstract

The revised criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the fifth edition of the necessitated the development of new screening tools for youth, one of the most widely used of which is the UCLA Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index for DSM-5 (RI-5). Thus far, the few studies that have investigated the RI-5's factor structure have supported a four-factor model. However, to date this research has been limited to youth with histories of exposure to single-event traumatic stressors, a significant limitation as evidence suggests many trauma-exposed youth report exposure to multiple types of traumatic stressors, or polyvictimization. It is imperative to determine the generalizability of previous factor models to specific populations which they are purported to represent. We investigated whether the RI-5's four-factor model replicated in a sample of 455 polyvictimized justice-involved adolescents. Initial confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the four-factor model did not converge. Therefore, we utilized Bayesian Structural Equations Modeling (BSEM) to determine why the previously proposed factor structure did not converge. The BSEM model suggested that the global factor structure was acceptable and did not require addition or subtraction of any factor or cross-factor loadings. However, small and moderate residual covariances resulted in model misspecification, suggesting there may be additional associations not captured by the current model for polyvictimized youth. Future work should continue examining the RI-5's factor structure in order to better understand whether the current results are unique and how measurements assessing PTSD symptom criteria perform in diverse trauma-exposed youth populations.

摘要

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版中创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的修订标准促使人们为青少年开发新的筛查工具,其中使用最广泛的一种是针对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版的加州大学洛杉矶分校创伤后应激障碍反应指数(RI - 5)。到目前为止,少数研究RI - 5因子结构的研究支持四因子模型。然而,迄今为止,这项研究仅限于有单次事件创伤应激源暴露史的青少年,这是一个重大局限,因为有证据表明,许多暴露于创伤的青少年报告称遭受了多种类型的创伤应激源,即多重受害。确定先前的因子模型对它们声称所代表的特定人群的可推广性至关重要。我们调查了RI - 5的四因子模型在455名涉及司法的多重受害青少年样本中是否能够复制。初步验证性因素分析表明四因子模型未能收敛。因此,我们利用贝叶斯结构方程模型(BSEM)来确定先前提出的因子结构未能收敛的原因。BSEM模型表明整体因子结构是可接受的,不需要添加或减去任何因子或交叉因子负荷。然而,小的和中等程度的残差协方差导致模型设定错误,这表明当前模型可能没有捕捉到多重受害青少年的其他关联。未来的工作应继续研究RI - 5的因子结构,以便更好地理解当前结果是否独特,以及评估PTSD症状标准的测量方法在不同的暴露于创伤的青少年群体中的表现如何。