Holme Thomas J, Karbowiak Marta, Clements Jennifer, Sharma Ritesh, Craik Johnathan, Ellahee Najab
Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Trauma & Orthopaedics, Carshalton, UK.
Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Trauma & Orthopaedics, Guildford, UK.
EFORT Open Rev. 2021 May 4;6(5):316-330. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200152. eCollection 2021 May.
Thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) arthritis is a common and painful condition. Thumb CMCJ prosthetic replacement aims to restore thumb biomechanics and improve pain and function. Early reviews demonstrated a lack of high-quality studies, but more recently a significant number of higher-quality studies have been published. This review provides a concise and systematic overview of the evidence to date.A systematic review of several databases was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies evaluating the outcomes of thumb CMCJ prosthetic total joint replacement were included. Data extracted included patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), pain scores, range of motion, strength, survival rates and complications.A total of 56 studies met all inclusion criteria and were analysed. There was one randomized controlled trial, three prospective comparative cohort studies, five retrospective comparative cohort studies, and 47 descriptive cohort studies. The reported studies included 2731 patients with 3048 thumb total CMCJ prosthetic joint replacements. Follow up ranged from 12 months to 13.1 years.In general, good results were demonstrated, with improvements in PROMs, pain scores and strength. Failure rates ranged from 2.6% to 19.9% depending upon implant studied. Comparative studies demonstrated promising results for replacement when compared to resection arthroplasty, with modest improvements in PROMs but at a cost of increased rates of complications.Studies reporting outcomes in thumb CMCJ prosthetic total joint replacement are increasing in both number and quality. Failure, in terms of loosening and dislocation, remains a concern, although in the medium-term follow up for modern implants this issue appears to be lower when compared to their predecessors.Functional outcomes also look promising compared to resection arthroplasty, but further high-quality studies utilizing a standardized resection arthroplasty technique and modern implants, together with standardized core outcome sets, will be of value. Cite this article: 2021;6:316-330. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200152.
拇指腕掌关节(CMCJ)关节炎是一种常见且疼痛的病症。拇指腕掌关节假体置换旨在恢复拇指生物力学并改善疼痛和功能。早期综述显示缺乏高质量研究,但最近已发表了大量更高质量的研究。本综述对迄今为止的证据提供了简明而系统的概述。
根据PRISMA指南对多个数据库进行了系统综述。纳入了评估拇指腕掌关节假体全关节置换结果的研究。提取的数据包括患者报告的结局指标(PROMs)、疼痛评分、活动范围、力量、生存率和并发症。
共有56项研究符合所有纳入标准并进行了分析。有1项随机对照试验、3项前瞻性比较队列研究、5项回顾性比较队列研究和47项描述性队列研究。报告的研究包括2731例患者,共进行了3048例拇指腕掌关节假体全关节置换。随访时间从12个月至13.1年。
总体而言,结果良好,PROMs、疼痛评分和力量均有改善。根据所研究的植入物不同,失败率在2.6%至19.9%之间。比较研究表明,与切除关节成形术相比,置换术有令人期待的结果,PROMs有适度改善,但代价是并发症发生率增加。
报告拇指腕掌关节假体全关节置换结果研究的数量和质量都在增加。尽管在中期随访中,与前代植入物相比,现代植入物的松动和脱位等失败问题似乎较少,但失败问题仍然令人担忧。
与切除关节成形术相比,功能结果看起来也很有前景,但采用标准化切除关节成形术技术和现代植入物以及标准化核心结局指标集的进一步高质量研究将很有价值。引用本文:2021;6:316 - 330。DOI:10.1302/2058 - 5241.6.200152。