Najdowski Adel C, Gharapetian Lusineh, Jewett Victorya
Psychology Division of the Graduate School of Education and Psychology, Pepperdine University, Malibu, CA USA.
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Jan 7;14(2):462-477. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00504-0. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Racist policies and inequity are prevalent in society; this includes higher education institutions. Many behavior-analytic training programs have been complicit in omitting cultural humility and antiracist ideas from their curricula and institutional practices. As societal demands for allyship and transformational change increase, programs must rise to the challenge and act as agents of change in our clinical, professional, and personal communities. The current article offers a multitude of strategies for institutions to develop an antiracist and multicultural approach. These recommendations encompass policies that may be promoted at the following levels: (a) in organizational infrastructure and leadership, (b) within curricula and pedagogy, (c) in research, and (d) with faculty, students, and staff.
种族主义政策和不平等现象在社会中普遍存在，高等教育机构也不例外。许多行为分析培训项目在其课程和机构实践中，都有意无意地忽略了文化谦逊和反种族主义理念。随着社会对盟友关系和变革性改变的需求不断增加，各项目必须迎接挑战，成为我们临床、专业和个人领域变革的推动者。本文为各机构提供了多种策略，以制定反种族主义和多元文化的方法。这些建议涵盖了可在以下层面推行的政策：(a) 组织架构和领导层；(b) 课程与教学法；(c) 研究方面；(d) 针对教师、学生和工作人员。
