Ielpo B, Podda M, Pellino G, Pata F, Caruso R, Gravante G, Di Saverio S
Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, University Hospital Leon, Leon, Spain.
Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Cagliari University Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Cagliari, Italy.
Br J Surg. 2021 Jun 22;108(6):717-726. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11999. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
Surgical strategies are being adapted to face the COVID-19 pandemic. Recommendations on the management of acute appendicitis have been based on expert opinion, but very little evidence is available. This study addressed that dearth with a snapshot of worldwide approaches to appendicitis.
The Association of Italian Surgeons in Europe designed an online survey to assess the current attitude of surgeons globally regarding the management of patients with acute appendicitis during the pandemic. Questions were divided into baseline information, hospital organization and screening, personal protective equipment, management and surgical approach, and patient presentation before versus during the pandemic.
Of 744 answers, 709 (from 66 countries) were complete and were included in the analysis. Most hospitals were treating both patients with and those without COVID. There was variation in screening indications and modality used, with chest X-ray plus molecular testing (PCR) being the commonest (19·8 per cent). Conservative management of complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis was used by 6·6 and 2·4 per cent respectively before, but 23·7 and 5·3 per cent, during the pandemic (both P < 0·001). One-third changed their approach from laparoscopic to open surgery owing to the popular (but evidence-lacking) advice from expert groups during the initial phase of the pandemic. No agreement on how to filter surgical smoke plume during laparoscopy was identified. There was an overall reduction in the number of patients admitted with appendicitis and one-third felt that patients who did present had more severe appendicitis than they usually observe.
Conservative management of mild appendicitis has been possible during the pandemic. The fact that some surgeons switched to open appendicectomy may reflect the poor guidelines that emanated in the early phase of SARS-CoV-2.
外科手术策略正在进行调整以应对新冠疫情。关于急性阑尾炎管理的建议一直基于专家意见,但可用证据非常少。本研究通过对全球阑尾炎治疗方法的简要描述来填补这一空白。
欧洲意大利外科医生协会设计了一项在线调查,以评估全球外科医生在疫情期间对急性阑尾炎患者管理的当前态度。问题分为基线信息、医院组织与筛查、个人防护设备、管理与手术方法,以及疫情前与疫情期间患者的表现。
在744份回复中,709份(来自66个国家)完整且纳入分析。大多数医院同时治疗新冠患者和非新冠患者。筛查指征和所用方式存在差异,胸部X线检查加分子检测(PCR)最为常见(19.8%)。在疫情前,分别有6.6%和2.4%的复杂和非复杂阑尾炎采用保守治疗,但在疫情期间这一比例分别为23.7%和5.3%(均P<0.001)。由于疫情初期专家小组流行但缺乏证据的建议,三分之一的医生将手术方式从腹腔镜手术改为开放手术。未就腹腔镜手术期间如何过滤手术烟雾达成共识。阑尾炎入院患者总数总体减少,三分之一的医生认为前来就诊的患者阑尾炎比他们通常观察到的更严重。
疫情期间轻度阑尾炎的保守治疗是可行的。一些外科医生转而进行开放性阑尾切除术这一事实可能反映了新冠疫情早期发布的不良指南。