• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用三种诊断方法评估爱尔兰中老年成年人的糖尿病前期患病率及其相关因素。

The prevalence and correlates of pre-diabetes in middle- to older-aged Irish adults using three diagnostic methods.

机构信息

HRB Centre for Health and Diet Research, School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jun 25;16(6):e0253537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253537. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0253537
PMID:34170932
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8232457/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Type 2 diabetes is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide and pre-diabetes is a strong predictor of diabetes development. To date, studies estimating the prevalence of pre-diabetes in the Irish population are sparse and conflicting. Monitoring the prevalence of pre-diabetes and a knowledge of associated factors is required to inform policies and to prevent development of type 2 diabetes. Therefore, this research examined the prevalence and correlates of pre-diabetes in a sample of middle- to older-aged Irish adults using three different methods for diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Mitchelstown Cohort Rescreen (2016/17) was a follow-up, cross-sectional study of the Mitchelstown Cohort Study (2010/11). 1,378 participants were recruited from a random sample of patients attending a single primary care centre. Pre-diabetes was defined using three diagnostic criteria: American Diabetes Association (ADA) glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) cut-offs between 5.7%-6.4% (39-46 mmol/mol), World Health Organization International Expert Committee (WHO-IEC) HbA1c cut-offs between 6.0%-6.4% (42-46 mmol/mol) and ADA fasting plasma glucose (FPG) cut-offs between 5.6-6.9 mmol/l. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine factors associated with pre-diabetes.

RESULTS

The prevalence of pre-diabetes was found to be 43.9% (95% CI: 41.2%─46.5%), 14.5% (95% CI: 12.7%─16.5%) and 15.8% (95% CI: 13.9%─17.8%) according to HbA1c ADA, HbA1c WHO-IEC and FPG ADA definitions, respectively. Depending on diagnostic method, factors associated with pre-diabetes in univariate analyses included sex, age, marital status, health rating, education and poor diet quality. In multivariable analysis, subjects classified by the FPG ADA pre-diabetes criterion displayed the least optimal metabolic profile defined by overweight and obesity (OR = 2.88, 95% CI: 1.53-5.43), hypertension (OR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.51-3.40) and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations (OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.07-2.87).

CONCLUSIONS

The discordance between prevalence estimates according to method of diagnosis is concerning. A National Diabetes Prevention Programme is currently being developed in Ireland. Monitoring the prevalence of pre-diabetes over time will be important to assess the effectiveness of this programme. This study will inform national decision-makers on which definition of pre-diabetes to use for monitoring purposes.

摘要

背景与目的

2 型糖尿病是全球范围内导致死亡和残疾的主要原因,而糖尿病前期是糖尿病发展的强有力预测指标。迄今为止,估计爱尔兰人群中糖尿病前期患病率的研究很少且相互矛盾。监测糖尿病前期的患病率和相关因素的知识对于制定政策和预防 2 型糖尿病的发生是必要的。因此,本研究使用三种不同的诊断方法,检查了中年至老年爱尔兰成年人样本中糖尿病前期的患病率和相关因素。

材料与方法

米切尔斯顿队列再筛查(2016/17 年)是米切尔斯顿队列研究(2010/11 年)的随访、横断面研究。从单一初级保健中心就诊的患者随机样本中招募了 1378 名参与者。糖尿病前期采用三种诊断标准定义:美国糖尿病协会(ADA)糖化血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)5.7%-6.4%(39-46mmol/mol)、世界卫生组织国际专家委员会(WHO-IEC)HbA1c 6.0%-6.4%(42-46mmol/mol)和 ADA 空腹血糖(FPG)5.6-6.9mmol/l。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析确定与糖尿病前期相关的因素。

结果

根据 HbA1c ADA、HbA1c WHO-IEC 和 FPG ADA 定义,糖尿病前期的患病率分别为 43.9%(95%CI:41.2%-46.5%)、14.5%(95%CI:12.7%-16.5%)和 15.8%(95%CI:13.9%-17.8%)。在单变量分析中,与糖尿病前期相关的因素包括性别、年龄、婚姻状况、健康状况评分、教育程度和不良饮食质量。在多变量分析中,根据 FPG ADA 糖尿病前期标准分类的受试者表现出最不理想的代谢特征,包括超重和肥胖(OR=2.88,95%CI:1.53-5.43)、高血压(OR=2.27,95%CI:1.51-3.40)和低高密度脂蛋白胆固醇浓度(OR=1.75,95%CI:1.07-2.87)。

结论

根据诊断方法的不同,患病率估计值之间存在差异令人担忧。爱尔兰目前正在制定国家糖尿病预防计划。随着时间的推移监测糖尿病前期的患病率对于评估该计划的有效性非常重要。本研究将为国家决策者提供有关用于监测目的的糖尿病前期定义的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f7e/8232457/19faf780371f/pone.0253537.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f7e/8232457/19faf780371f/pone.0253537.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f7e/8232457/19faf780371f/pone.0253537.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The prevalence and correlates of pre-diabetes in middle- to older-aged Irish adults using three diagnostic methods.采用三种诊断方法评估爱尔兰中老年成年人的糖尿病前期患病率及其相关因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 25;16(6):e0253537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253537. eCollection 2021.
2
Comparison of glycated haemoglobin and fasting blood glucose in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and pre-diabetes in a cohort of obese patients.肥胖患者队列中糖化血红蛋白与空腹血糖在糖尿病及糖尿病前期诊断中的比较
J R Nav Med Serv. 2017 Spring;103(1):39-43.
3
Pre-diabetes in adults 45 years and over in Ireland: the Survey of Lifestyle, Attitudes and Nutrition in Ireland 2007.爱尔兰 45 岁及以上成年人的糖尿病前期:爱尔兰生活方式、态度和营养调查 2007 年。
Diabet Med. 2013 Oct;30(10):1198-203. doi: 10.1111/dme.12226. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
4
Comparison of fasting plasma glucose and haemoglobin A1c point-of-care tests in screening for diabetes and abnormal glucose regulation in a rural low income setting.在农村低收入环境中,空腹血糖与糖化血红蛋白即时检测在糖尿病筛查及血糖调节异常筛查中的比较
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Apr;104(1):112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.12.030. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
5
HbA1c alone is a poor indicator of cardiometabolic risk in middle-aged subjects with pre-diabetes but is suitable for type 2 diabetes diagnosis: a cross-sectional study.糖化血红蛋白单独作为糖尿病前期中年受试者心血管代谢风险的指标不佳,但适用于2型糖尿病诊断:一项横断面研究
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 12;10(8):e0134154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134154. eCollection 2015.
6
High prevalence and significant ethnic differences in actionable HbA after gestational diabetes mellitus in women living in Norway.在挪威生活的女性中,妊娠期糖尿病后可采取行动的糖化血红蛋白的高患病率和显著的种族差异。
BMC Med. 2022 Sep 23;20(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02515-w.
7
Comparative prognostic performance of definitions of prediabetes: a prospective cohort analysis of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.不同糖尿病前期定义对预后评估价值的比较:前瞻性社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究(ARIC)的队列分析。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Jan;5(1):34-42. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30321-7. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
8
Diabetes and pre-diabetes among persons aged 35 to 60 years in eastern Uganda: prevalence and associated factors.乌干达东部 35 至 60 岁人群中的糖尿病和糖尿病前期:患病率及相关因素。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 14;8(8):e72554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072554. eCollection 2013.
9
Prevalence and correlates of diagnosed and undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus and pre-diabetes in older adults: Findings from the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA).老年人中诊断和未诊断的 2 型糖尿病和糖尿病前期的患病率及其相关因素:来自爱尔兰老龄化纵向研究(TILDA)的结果。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015 Dec;110(3):241-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
10
Determinants of diagnostic discordance for non-diabetic hyperglycaemia and Type 2 diabetes using paired glycated haemoglobin measurements in a large English primary care population: cross-sectional study.在一个大型英国初级保健人群中,使用配对糖化血红蛋白测量值评估非糖尿病高血糖和 2 型糖尿病的诊断不一致的决定因素:横断面研究。
Diabet Med. 2019 Nov;36(11):1478-1486. doi: 10.1111/dme.14111. Epub 2019 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities increase the risk of type 2 diabetes: an analysis of NHS health check attendees in Birmingham.社会经济和种族不平等增加了2型糖尿病的风险:对伯明翰国民保健服务健康检查参与者的分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 27;12:1477418. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1477418. eCollection 2024.
2
Cohort profile update: The Cork and Kerry Diabetes and Heart Disease Study.队列研究概况更新:科克和凯里糖尿病与心脏病研究
HRB Open Res. 2023 Apr 21;6:25. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13626.1. eCollection 2023.
3
The Interaction Between Age and Risk Factors for Diabetes and Prediabetes: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Protective lifestyle behaviours and lipoprotein particle subclass profiles in a middle-to older-aged population.中年至老年人群的保护性生活方式行为与脂蛋白颗粒亚类特征。
Atherosclerosis. 2020 Dec;314:18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.10.005. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
2
Prediabetes defined by HbA and by fasting glucose: differences in risk factors and prevalence.糖化血红蛋白和空腹血糖定义的糖尿病前期:危险因素和患病率的差异。
Acta Diabetol. 2019 Sep;56(9):1023-1030. doi: 10.1007/s00592-019-01342-5. Epub 2019 May 21.
3
Understanding prediabetes: definition, prevalence, burden and treatment options for an emerging disease.
年龄与糖尿病及糖尿病前期危险因素之间的相互作用:一项基于社区的横断面研究。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2023 Jan 11;16:85-93. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S390857. eCollection 2023.
4
Prevalence of Diabetes Among Community-Living Older Persons in the Philippines: The FITforFrail Study.菲律宾社区老年人糖尿病患病率:FITforFrail 研究。
J ASEAN Fed Endocr Soc. 2022;37(2):23-27. doi: 10.15605/jafes.037.02.15. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
了解前驱糖尿病:一种新兴疾病的定义、流行率、负担和治疗选择。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Sep;35(9):1529-1534. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1601455. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
4
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: .2. 糖尿病的分类和诊断:
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S13-S28. doi: 10.2337/dc19-S002.
5
Health service utilization and related costs attributable to diabetes.糖尿病导致的卫生服务利用及相关费用。
Diabet Med. 2018 Dec;35(12):1727-1734. doi: 10.1111/dme.13806. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
6
State-level estimation of diabetes and prediabetes prevalence: Combining national and local survey data and clinical data.省级糖尿病和糖尿病前期患病率估计:结合国家和地方调查数据及临床数据。
Stat Med. 2018 Nov 30;37(27):3975-3990. doi: 10.1002/sim.7848. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
7
Impact of Healthy Lifestyle Factors on Life Expectancies in the US Population.美国人口中健康生活方式因素对预期寿命的影响。
Circulation. 2018 Jul 24;138(4):345-355. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032047.
8
DASH Eating Plan: An Eating Pattern for Diabetes Management.得舒饮食计划:一种用于糖尿病管理的饮食模式。
Diabetes Spectr. 2017 May;30(2):76-81. doi: 10.2337/ds16-0084.
9
A Multiethnic Study of Pre-Diabetes and Diabetes in LMIC.低收入和中等收入国家糖尿病前期和糖尿病的多民族研究
Glob Heart. 2016 Mar;11(1):61-70. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2015.12.015.
10
Prediabetes Diagnosis and Treatment in Primary Care.基层医疗中的糖尿病前期诊断与治疗
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;29(2):283-5. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.02.150252.