Suppr超能文献

糖化血红蛋白单独作为糖尿病前期中年受试者心血管代谢风险的指标不佳,但适用于2型糖尿病诊断:一项横断面研究

HbA1c alone is a poor indicator of cardiometabolic risk in middle-aged subjects with pre-diabetes but is suitable for type 2 diabetes diagnosis: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Millar Seán R, Perry Ivan J, Phillips Catherine M

机构信息

HRB Centre for Health and Diet Research, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Aug 12;10(8):e0134154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134154. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measurement is recommended as an alternative to fasting plasma glucose (FPG) for the diagnosis of pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes. However, evidence suggests discordance between HbA1c and FPG. In this study we examine a range of metabolic risk features, pro-inflammatory cytokines, acute-phase response proteins, coagulation factors and white blood cell counts to determine which assay more accurately identifies individuals at increased cardiometabolic risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study involving a random sample of 2,047 men and women aged 46-73 years. Binary and multinomial logistic regression were employed to examine risk feature associations with pre-diabetes [either HbA1c levels 5.7-6.4% (39-46 mmol/mol) or impaired FPG levels 5.6-6.9 mmol/l] and type 2 diabetes [either HbA1c levels >6.5% (>48 mmol/mol) or FPG levels >7.0 mmol/l]. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the ability of HbA1c to discriminate pre-diabetes and diabetes defined by FPG.

RESULTS

Stronger associations with diabetes-related phenotypes were observed in pre-diabetic subjects diagnosed by FPG compared to those detected by HbA1c. Individuals with type 2 diabetes exhibited cardiometabolic profiles that were broadly similar according to diagnosis by either assay. Pre-diabetic participants classified by both assays displayed a more pro-inflammatory, pro-atherogenic, hypertensive and insulin resistant profile. Odds ratios of having three or more metabolic syndrome features were also noticeably increased (OR: 4.0, 95% CI: 2.8-5.8) when compared to subjects diagnosed by either HbA1c (OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.2-1.8) or FPG (OR: 3.0, 95% CI: 1.7-5.1) separately.

CONCLUSIONS

In middle-aged Caucasian-Europeans, HbA1c alone is a poor indicator of cardiometabolic risk but is suitable for diagnosing diabetes. Combined use of HbA1c and FPG may be of additional benefit for detecting individuals at highest odds of type 2 diabetes development.

摘要

目的

糖化血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)检测被推荐作为空腹血糖(FPG)的替代方法,用于诊断糖尿病前期和2型糖尿病。然而,有证据表明HbA1c与FPG之间存在不一致。在本研究中,我们检测了一系列代谢风险特征、促炎细胞因子、急性期反应蛋白、凝血因子和白细胞计数,以确定哪种检测方法能更准确地识别心血管代谢风险增加的个体。

材料与方法

这是一项横断面研究,随机抽取了2047名年龄在46 - 73岁之间的男性和女性。采用二元和多项逻辑回归分析来研究风险特征与糖尿病前期[HbA1c水平为5.7 - 6.4%(39 - 46 mmol/mol)或空腹血糖受损水平为5.6 - 6.9 mmol/l]及2型糖尿病[HbA1c水平>6.5%(>48 mmol/mol)或空腹血糖水平>7.0 mmol/l]之间的关联。采用受试者工作特征曲线分析来评估HbA1c区分由空腹血糖定义的糖尿病前期和糖尿病的能力。

结果

与通过HbA1c检测出的糖尿病前期受试者相比,通过空腹血糖检测出的糖尿病前期受试者与糖尿病相关表型的关联更强。根据两种检测方法诊断的2型糖尿病个体表现出大致相似的心血管代谢特征。两种检测方法均诊断为糖尿病前期的参与者表现出更具促炎、促动脉粥样硬化、高血压和胰岛素抵抗的特征。与单独通过HbA1c(比值比:1.4,95%置信区间:1.2 - 1.8)或空腹血糖(比值比:3.0,95%置信区间:1.7 - 5.1)诊断的受试者相比,具有三种或更多代谢综合征特征的比值比也显著增加(比值比:4.0,95%置信区间:2.8 - 5.8)。

结论

在中年欧洲白种人中,单独的HbA1c是心血管代谢风险的不良指标,但适用于诊断糖尿病。联合使用HbA1c和空腹血糖可能有助于检测出发生2型糖尿病几率最高的个体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c508/4534196/c4eaa8e3e1c2/pone.0134154.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验