Alves Mylena Aparecida Rodrigues, de Souza Lencina Marcus Vinicius, Paes Mayara Juliana, Stefanello Joice Mara Facco
Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Paraná, Brazil.
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2021 Jun 26;34(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s41155-021-00183-y.
Collective efficacy, defined as a group's shared belief about its conjoint capability to organize and execute courses of action, plays a pivotal role in understanding the dynamics of sports teams, since it influences what individuals choose to do as team members, how much they invest in motivational terms to perform actions, how much they work collectively, and for how long they persist despite failure. Through a systematic review, it was investigated how collective efficacy has been assessed in the context of soccer and which indicators, attributes, and psychometric properties have been contemplated in the instruments used. Following the PRISMA guidelines, 22 articles were retrieved through electronic databases (APA PsycINFO; SPORTDiscus; Science Direct; BVS; Web of Science; Scopus; PubMed; and Scielo), using as descriptors, in English, Spanish, and Portuguese, collective efficacy and soccer, combined by the Boolean operators AND and OR. The study did not delimit the initial year of publication for the searches carried out, including all articles found until January 14, 2021 (date of the last update). The following eligibility criteria were adopted: scientific articles published in journals; original studies, which specified the instrument used to assess collective efficacy and carried out with soccer athletes. Five instruments (FCEQ, CEQS, CEI, CEC, and CEQsoccer) that evaluated technical-tactical and psychological attributes associated with collective efficacy in soccer players were identified. In most studies, psychometric properties were restricted to content validity and reliability (internal consistency), and there were no suitable validation processes for the instruments used to measure collective efficacy, which can be considered a limiting factor for understanding this psychological construct in soccer modality.
集体效能被定义为一个群体对其共同组织和执行行动方案能力的共同信念,在理解运动队的动态方面起着关键作用,因为它影响个体作为团队成员选择做什么、在激励方面为执行行动投入多少、他们集体工作的程度以及尽管失败仍坚持多久。通过系统综述,研究了在足球背景下集体效能是如何被评估的,以及在使用的工具中考虑了哪些指标、属性和心理测量特性。遵循PRISMA指南,通过电子数据库(APA PsycINFO;SPORTDiscus;Science Direct;BVS;科学网;Scopus;PubMed;和Scielo)检索了22篇文章,使用英文、西班牙文和葡萄牙文作为描述词,将集体效能和足球通过布尔运算符AND和OR组合起来。该研究没有对所进行搜索的初始出版年份进行限定,包括截至2021年1月14日(最后更新日期)找到的所有文章。采用了以下纳入标准:发表在期刊上的科学文章;原始研究,明确了用于评估集体效能的工具且是针对足球运动员进行的。确定了五种评估足球运动员与集体效能相关的技术战术和心理属性的工具(FCEQ、CEQS、CEI、CEC和CEQsoccer)。在大多数研究中,心理测量特性仅限于内容效度和信度(内部一致性),并且对于用于测量集体效能的工具没有合适的验证过程,这可被视为在足球模式中理解这一心理结构的一个限制因素。