• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据罗布森10组分类系统进行的剖宫产率及围产期结局分析

Cesarean Section Rate and Perinatal Outcome Analyses According to Robson's 10-Group Classification System.

作者信息

Eftekharian Christabel, Husslein Peter Wolf, Lehner Rainer

机构信息

Division of Obstetrics and Feto-Maternal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Matern Child Health J. 2021 Sep;25(9):1474-1481. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03183-7. Epub 2021 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1007/s10995-021-03183-7
PMID:34181155
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The cesarean delivery (CD) rate is increasing worldwide. An internationally recognized classification system had been required to analyse the trend and its possible consequences in a standardized manner. The goal of this study was to identify the main contributors to the CD rate at the Medical University of Vienna in an 11-year time period (2003-2013) and to analyse neonatal outcome parameters within the ten Robson categories.

METHODS

This is a retrospective data-analysis of singleton and twin pregnancies in cephalic, breech and transverse presentation with a gestational age between 23 and 42 weeks. The cases were divided into ten classes based on the Robson criteria. CD rates and perinatal outcome parameters were analysed within each Robson class. The outcome parameters included: NICU-admission rate and 5 min Apgar score values < 7.

RESULTS

The overall CD rate was at 44.2%. Within Robson class 5 the CD rate was the highest at 99.1%. Main contributors were Robson class 5 at 20.6%, followed by class 2 at 17.1% and class 8 at 15.0%. Neonatal outcome analyses revealed significant differences between the Robson classes.

CONCLUSIONS

The main contributors to the CD rate were determined. We suggest reconsidering the frequently applied birth mode especially for Robson class 2, 4, 5 and 8. Lowering the CD rate could be achievable, if a careful delivery management and an individual risk evaluation is provided. It is important to reduce the CD rate in the individual Robson classes under consideration of perinatal outcome parameters, since a reduction should only take place where it is clinically useful and relevant.

摘要

目的

剖宫产率在全球范围内呈上升趋势。需要一个国际认可的分类系统来以标准化方式分析这一趋势及其可能产生的后果。本研究的目的是确定维也纳医科大学在11年期间(2003 - 2013年)剖宫产率的主要影响因素,并分析十个罗布森分类中的新生儿结局参数。

方法

这是一项对单胎和双胎妊娠的回顾性数据分析,妊娠孕周为23至42周,胎位为头位、臀位和横位。根据罗布森标准将病例分为十类。在每个罗布森分类中分析剖宫产率和围产期结局参数。结局参数包括:新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入住率和5分钟阿氏评分<7分。

结果

总体剖宫产率为44.2%。在罗布森分类5中,剖宫产率最高,为99.1%。主要影响因素是罗布森分类5,占20.6%,其次是分类2,占17.1%,分类8,占15.0%。新生儿结局分析显示罗布森分类之间存在显著差异。

结论

确定了剖宫产率的主要影响因素。我们建议重新考虑经常采用的分娩方式,特别是对于罗布森分类2、4、5和8。如果提供仔细的分娩管理和个体风险评估,降低剖宫产率是可以实现的。在考虑围产期结局参数的情况下,降低各个罗布森分类中的剖宫产率很重要,因为只有在临床有用且相关的情况下才应进行降低。

相似文献

1
Cesarean Section Rate and Perinatal Outcome Analyses According to Robson's 10-Group Classification System.根据罗布森10组分类系统进行的剖宫产率及围产期结局分析
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Sep;25(9):1474-1481. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03183-7. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
2
Impact of clinical audits on cesarean section rate in a Spanish hospital: Analysis of 6 year data according to the Robson classification.临床审计对西班牙一家医院剖宫产率的影响:根据罗布森分类法对6年数据的分析。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Nov;254:308-314. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.09.017. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
3
A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section.迈向更好的审计:除剖宫产外的其他结局的 Robson Ten 分组分类系统。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Jul;101(7):827-835. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14350. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
4
Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth.使用罗布森分类法评估巴西的剖宫产率:分娩支付来源的作用。
Reprod Health. 2016 Oct 17;13(Suppl 3):128. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0228-7.
5
Impact of national guidelines on the cesarean delivery rate in France: A 2010-2016 comparison using the Robson classification.法国国家指南对剖宫产率的影响:使用罗布森分类法进行的2010 - 2016年比较
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Sep;252:359-365. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
6
Achievement of appropriate cesarean rates using Robson's 10-Group classification system in Brazilian private practice.采用罗伯逊的 10 分组分类系统在巴西私人执业中实现适当的剖宫产率。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jul 10;23(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05803-2.
7
In which groups of pregnant women can the caesarean delivery rate likely be reduced safely in the USA? A multicentre cross-sectional study.在美国,哪些孕妇群体的剖宫产率有可能安全降低?一项多中心横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 5;8(8):e021670. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021670.
8
An analysis of the high cesarean section rates in Turkey by Robson classification.对土耳其按罗伯逊分类法分析的高剖宫产率。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Aug;34(16):2682-2692. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1670806. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
9
Robsons Ten Group Classification of Cesarean Section at a Tertiary Center in Nepal.尼泊尔一家三级中心的罗布斯顿剖宫产分类法。
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2021 Apr 23;19(1):91-96. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v19i1.2694.
10
[Ratio of transfer cesarean section after trial of labor and maternal-fetal adverse outcomes based on Robson classifications].[基于罗布森分类法的试产后剖宫产率与母胎不良结局]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Aug 25;54(8):512-515. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.08.002.

引用本文的文献

1
A 10-year cesarean section rate analysis in a Brazilian referral maternity hospital using the Robson's ten group classification system.在一家巴西转诊妇产医院使用罗布森十组分类系统进行的10年剖宫产率分析。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2025 Jul 15;47. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo51. eCollection 2025.
2
Reaching caesarean section rates below 15%: experience of a French tertiary maternity using the Robson classification system.将剖宫产率降至15%以下:一家法国三级妇产医院采用罗布森分类系统的经验
Reprod Health. 2025 Jun 6;22(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02052-8.
3
Reducing caesarean section rates in Robson groups 1 and 3: a quality improvement initiative in a private Brazilian hospital.

本文引用的文献

1
Labour and Childbirth After Previous Caesarean Section: Recommendations of the Austrian Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (OEGGG).既往剖宫产术后的分娩与接生:奥地利妇产科学会(OEGGG)的建议
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016 Dec;76(12):1279-1286. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-118335.
2
A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn't work and how to improve it.剖宫产罗布森分类法的系统评价:哪些有效、哪些无效以及如何改进。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 3;9(6):e97769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097769. eCollection 2014.
3
A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy.
降低罗布森分类法第1组和第3组的剖宫产率:巴西一家私立医院的质量改进举措。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Mar 4;14(1):e003077. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003077.
4
[Classification of caesarean sections by 10 Robson groups in a second level hospital].[二级医院剖宫产按10个罗布森组分类]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023 Sep 18;61(Suppl 2):S343-S349.
5
Investigating Caesarean Section Practice among Teenage Romanian Mothers Using Modified Robson Ten Group Classification System.采用改良 Robson 十组分类系统调查罗马尼亚未成年母亲剖宫产术实践。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 13;18(20):10727. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010727.
双胎妊娠计划性剖宫产与阴道分娩的随机对照试验。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 3;369(14):1295-305. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214939.
4
Examining caesarean section rates in Canada using the Robson classification system.使用罗布森分类系统研究加拿大的剖宫产率。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Mar;35(3):206-214. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30992-0.
5
Classification of caesarean sections in Canada: the Modified Robson criteria.加拿大剖宫产的分类:改良罗布森标准。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012 Oct;34(10):976-979. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35412-3.