• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[二级医院剖宫产按10个罗布森组分类]

[Classification of caesarean sections by 10 Robson groups in a second level hospital].

作者信息

Herrera-Zarate Guadalupe Esmeralda, Cardona-Torres Luz María

机构信息

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Unidad de Medicina Familiar No. 49, Servicio de Medicina Familiar. Celaya, Guanajuato, México.

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Hospital General de Zona No. 4, Departamento de Educación e Investigación en Salud. Celaya, Guanajuato, México.

出版信息

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023 Sep 18;61(Suppl 2):S343-S349.

PMID:38016464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11970726/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In recent years, cesarean section (CS) rates have increased alarmingly. The World Health Organization (WHO) proposes to use the Robson classification system as a global standard, which contributes to a better analysis of CS indications, making it possible to establish strategies to reduce them.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the classification of CS by Robson groups from July to September 2020 at the Hospital General de Zona No. 4 (District General Hospital [DGH] No. 4), in Celaya, Guanajuato.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study which included 160 records of women undergoing CS. Robson's group classification was used, and descriptive statistics and cluster analysis were performed to better understand the classification groups.

RESULTS

The average age was 27.6 ± 5.6 years. 53.1% had secondary school; 46.9% was a housewife; 46.3% was laborer; 42.8% were cohabitating; 50% had 1 or more births; 42.5% previous CS; 96.9% 1 fetus; 91.9% cephalic presentation; 78.8% 37 weeks of gestational age or more. Robson's group 5 (previous CS) had the highest percentage (42.5%), followed by group 2 (primiparous) with 20.6%, and group 10 (premature) 13.1%. Cluster analysis formed 3 groups, where cluster 1 and 3 contained group 5 of Robson's classification.

CONCLUSIONS

DGH No. 4 must carry out the necessary strategies so that women with a previous cesarean section can have a vaginal delivery, without compromising the well-being of the mother-child pair, in addition to interventions to avoid primary CS, because women in group 1 and 2 will potentially belong to group 5, in the next obstetric event.

摘要

背景

近年来,剖宫产率急剧上升。世界卫生组织(WHO)提议将罗布森分类系统作为全球标准,这有助于更好地分析剖宫产指征,从而制定降低剖宫产率的策略。

目的

分析2020年7月至9月瓜纳华托州塞拉亚市第4区综合医院(第4区总医院)剖宫产的罗布森分组情况。

材料与方法

回顾性研究,纳入160例剖宫产妇女的记录。采用罗布森分组分类法,并进行描述性统计和聚类分析,以更好地了解分类组。

结果

平均年龄为27.6±5.6岁。53.1%的人有中学学历;46.9%为家庭主妇;46.3%为劳动者;42.8%为同居;50%有1次或更多次分娩;42.5%曾有剖宫产史;96.9%为单胎;91.9%为头先露;78.8%孕周≥37周。罗布森第5组(曾有剖宫产史)所占百分比最高(42.5%),其次是第2组(初产妇),占20.6%,第10组(早产)占13.1%。聚类分析形成3组,其中聚类1和聚类3包含罗布森分类的第5组。

结论

第4区总医院必须实施必要的策略,使有剖宫产史的妇女能够进行阴道分娩,同时不影响母婴健康,此外还要采取干预措施避免首次剖宫产,因为第1组和第2组的妇女在下一次产科事件中可能会属于第5组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9ae/11970726/59a8f9c4b875/04435117-61-Suppl2-S343-c005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9ae/11970726/8d99a26c892c/04435117-61-Suppl2-S343-c001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9ae/11970726/3b2928fb3df3/04435117-61-Suppl2-S343-c002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9ae/11970726/a81836ba291b/04435117-61-Suppl2-S343-c003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9ae/11970726/8e0f4e2f05b2/04435117-61-Suppl2-S343-c004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9ae/11970726/59a8f9c4b875/04435117-61-Suppl2-S343-c005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9ae/11970726/8d99a26c892c/04435117-61-Suppl2-S343-c001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9ae/11970726/3b2928fb3df3/04435117-61-Suppl2-S343-c002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9ae/11970726/a81836ba291b/04435117-61-Suppl2-S343-c003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9ae/11970726/8e0f4e2f05b2/04435117-61-Suppl2-S343-c004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9ae/11970726/59a8f9c4b875/04435117-61-Suppl2-S343-c005.jpg

相似文献

1
[Classification of caesarean sections by 10 Robson groups in a second level hospital].[二级医院剖宫产按10个罗布森组分类]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023 Sep 18;61(Suppl 2):S343-S349.
2
[Incidencia de la operación cesárea según la clasificación de Robson en el Servicio de Ginecología y Obstetricia del Hospital Gral. Dr. Fernando Quiroz Gutiérrez del Instituto de Seguridad Social al Servicio de los Trabajadores del Estado].[根据罗布森分类法,在社会保障局下属的费尔南多·基罗斯·古铁雷斯博士综合医院妇产科对国家劳动者服务的剖宫产发生率]
Cir Cir. 2018;86(3):261-269. doi: 10.24875/CIRU.M18000044.
3
Analysis of cesarean section rates and its indications using robson's classification at a tertiary care hospital, Manipur.在曼尼普尔邦的一家三级护理医院,使用罗布森分类法分析剖宫产率及其指征。
Indian J Public Health. 2022 Oct-Dec;66(4):434-438. doi: 10.4103/ijph.ijph_1928_21.
4
Risk adjustment models for interhospital comparison of CS rates using Robson's ten group classification system and other socio-demographic and clinical variables.利用罗伯逊的十分组分类系统和其他社会人口学及临床变量对 CS 率进行医院间比较的风险调整模型。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Jun 21;12:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-54.
5
RISK OF NEONATAL HOSPITALIZATION ASSOCIATED TO DELIVERY BY CESAREAN SECTION IN A HIGH COMPLEXITY CLINIC IN BOGOTÁ, COLOMBIA, 2018.哥伦比亚波哥大一家高复杂度诊所剖宫产分娩新生儿住院风险,2018 年。
Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2020 Mar;71(1):42-55. doi: 10.18597/rcog.3364.
6
Examining caesarean section rates in Canada using the Robson classification system.使用罗布森分类系统研究加拿大的剖宫产率。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Mar;35(3):206-214. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30992-0.
7
An analysis of the high cesarean section rates in Turkey by Robson classification.对土耳其按罗伯逊分类法分析的高剖宫产率。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Aug;34(16):2682-2692. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1670806. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
8
The Project Appropriate Birth and a reduction in caesarean section rates: an analysis using the Robson classification system.项目适宜分娩和剖宫产率降低:应用罗伯逊分类系统进行的分析。
BJOG. 2022 Jan;129(1):72-80. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16919. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
9
Robsons Ten Group Classification of Cesarean Section at a Tertiary Center in Nepal.尼泊尔一家三级中心的罗布斯顿剖宫产分类法。
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2021 Apr 23;19(1):91-96. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v19i1.2694.
10
Cesarean section in Suriname using robson classification: a two-year nationwide cross-sectional study on rates, risk factors and perinatal outcomes of cesarean section.苏里南剖宫产的罗布森分类法:一项关于剖宫产率、危险因素及围产期结局的为期两年的全国性横断面研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 20;25(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07009-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Cesarean birth and risk of obesity from birth to adolescence: A cohort study.剖宫产与婴儿至青春期肥胖风险:一项队列研究。
Birth. 2022 Dec;49(4):774-782. doi: 10.1111/birt.12644. Epub 2022 May 8.
2
Associations between caesarean births and breastfeeding in the Middle East: a scoping review.中东地区剖宫产分娩与母乳喂养的关联:范围综述。
East Mediterr Health J. 2021 Sep 21;27(9):931-940. doi: 10.26719/emhj.21.027.
3
The Project Appropriate Birth and a reduction in caesarean section rates: an analysis using the Robson classification system.
项目适宜分娩和剖宫产率降低:应用罗伯逊分类系统进行的分析。
BJOG. 2022 Jan;129(1):72-80. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16919. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
4
Using the Robson classification to assess caesarean section rates in Brazil: an observational study of more than 24 million births from 2011 to 2017.利用 Robson 分类评估巴西的剖宫产率:2011 年至 2017 年超过 2400 万例分娩的观察性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Aug 30;21(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04060-5.
5
Cesarean Section Rate and Perinatal Outcome Analyses According to Robson's 10-Group Classification System.根据罗布森10组分类系统进行的剖宫产率及围产期结局分析
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Sep;25(9):1474-1481. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03183-7. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
6
Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson's Ten Group Classification System.使用罗布森十组分类系统对剖宫产进行分析。
Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Mar-Apr;37(2):567-571. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.2.3823.
7
Cesarean sections in Brazil's teaching hospitals: an analysis using Robson Classification.巴西教学医院的剖宫产手术:一项使用罗布森分类法的分析
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2021 Feb 26;45:e16. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2021.16. eCollection 2021.
8
"An unnecessary cut?" multilevel health systems analysis of drivers of caesarean sections rates in Italy: a systematic review.“不必要的剖宫产?”意大利剖宫产率驱动因素的多层次卫生系统分析:系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Dec 10;20(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03462-1.
9
Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.采用罗伯逊十组分类系统对埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴一所三级教学医院剖宫产率的分析:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Dec 9;20(1):767. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03474-x.
10
Pediatrics Consequences of Caesarean Section-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.剖宫产术的儿科后果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 31;17(21):8031. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218031.