Marin Teresa J, Hayden Jill A, Lewinson Rebecca, Mahood Quenby, Pepler Debra, Katz Joel
Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
J Pain Res. 2021 Jun 23;14:1875-1885. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S313470. eCollection 2021.
This systematic review synthesized evidence about the relationship between childhood bullying victimization and chronic pain, with a focus on the temporal nature of the relationship and moderating factors, such as the type and intensity of victimization.
We included prospective cohort studies that examined the relationship between childhood bullying victimization and pain measured at least three months later. We conducted electronic searches of Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL up to June 30, 2019. Standard methodological procedures consistent with Cochrane reviews of prognosis studies were used (PROSPERO record ID 133146).
We included four longitudinal studies (6275 participants) in this review. The mean age of participants at baseline ranged from 10 to 14 years and the follow-up periods ranged from 6 months to 12 years. Two of the four studies were judged as having high risk of bias. Meta-analysis of results from four studies revealed increased risk of pain among victimized compared to non-victimized youth (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.45 [1.06-1.97], but the effect size was small and not clinically important. Only one study examined the inverse association (ie, from pain to victimization), and there was not enough evidence to conduct a meaningful analysis of the proposed moderators.
Study findings were limited by few prospective studies. Meta-analytic findings suggested that victimization may incur some risk for later pain, although the evidence was judged to be very low quality. High-quality studies that measure and report the nuances of bullying victimization are needed to test the proposed moderator models.
本系统评价综合了关于童年期受欺凌与慢性疼痛之间关系的证据,重点关注这种关系的时间性质以及调节因素,如受欺凌的类型和强度。
我们纳入了前瞻性队列研究,这些研究考察了童年期受欺凌与至少三个月后测量的疼痛之间的关系。我们对截至2019年6月30日的Medline、EMBASE、PsycINFO和CINAHL进行了电子检索。采用了与Cochrane预后研究综述一致的标准方法程序(PROSPERO记录编号133146)。
本评价纳入了四项纵向研究(6275名参与者)。参与者基线时的平均年龄在10至14岁之间,随访期从6个月到12年不等。四项研究中有两项被判定存在高偏倚风险。对四项研究结果的荟萃分析显示,与未受欺凌的青少年相比,受欺凌青少年出现疼痛的风险增加(调整后的比值比[95%置信区间]=1.45[1.06 - 1.97]),但效应量较小且在临床上无重要意义。只有一项研究考察了反向关联(即从疼痛到受欺凌),且没有足够的证据对所提出的调节因素进行有意义的分析。
研究结果受到前瞻性研究较少的限制。荟萃分析结果表明,受欺凌可能会使日后出现疼痛的风险增加,尽管证据质量被判定为非常低。需要高质量的研究来测量和报告欺凌受害情况的细微差别,以检验所提出的调节因素模型。