McDowell Caitlin, Fossey Ellie, Harvey Carol
Department of Community and Clinical Allied Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Sep;44(19):5504-5512. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1937341. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
This study sought to better understand the views and practices of disability employment specialists working with clients with mental illness. Specifically, it explored what helps and hinders employment specialists in their work.
A constructivist grounded theory methodology was used. Semi-structured interviews with 16 disability employment specialists from four employment service providers in Victoria, Australia, were transcribed and analysed through initial coding, focused coding, and constant comparative methods.
Analysis led to the substantive grounded theory of "moving clients forward." The key themes included "taking a firm but fair approach," "meeting clients where they are at," "getting clients ready for work," "managing the interface between clients and employers," and as a consequence, "working under pressure."
These findings contribute the first grounded theory of how Australian disability employment specialists work with clients with mental illness and enhance understanding of employment specialists' notions of job readiness and their use of discretion in implementing seemingly contradictory employment-related policies. Practice tensions for these employment specialists could be reduced by modifying disability employment policies, and through training to deliver evidence-based practices that offer varied vocational services, pathways, and adjunct interventions tailored to clients' interests, needs and readiness for change.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONAustralian disability employment specialists experience tensions between meeting the needs of clients with mental illness and feeling pressured to adhere to performance-based funding and disability employment policies.Greater emphasis on evidence-based, individualised vocational interventions would better align with a recovery orientation and offer vocational options tailored to the needs and goals of job seekers with mental illnessFurther training and systemic support is needed for disability employment specialists to adopt evidence-based practices in their work with jobseekers with mental illness.Since Australian disability employment specialists describe considering the "job readiness" of clients in practice, the usefulness of this concept merits further investigation.
本研究旨在更好地了解为患有精神疾病的客户提供服务的残疾就业专家的观点和做法。具体而言,它探讨了有助于和阻碍就业专家工作的因素。
采用建构主义扎根理论方法。对来自澳大利亚维多利亚州四家就业服务提供商的16名残疾就业专家进行了半结构化访谈,并通过初始编码、聚焦编码和持续比较法对访谈内容进行了转录和分析。
分析得出了“推动客户前进”这一实质性扎根理论。关键主题包括“采取坚定但公平的方法”“在客户所处的位置与他们会面”“让客户为工作做好准备”“管理客户与雇主之间的接口”,以及由此产生的“在压力下工作”。
这些发现贡献了首个关于澳大利亚残疾就业专家如何与患有精神疾病的客户合作的扎根理论,并增进了对就业专家的就业准备观念以及他们在实施看似相互矛盾的就业相关政策时如何运用自由裁量权的理解。通过修改残疾就业政策,以及通过培训以提供基于证据的实践,为客户提供符合其兴趣、需求和改变意愿的多样化职业服务、途径和辅助干预措施,可以减轻这些就业专家在实践中的紧张关系。
对康复的启示
澳大利亚残疾就业专家在满足患有精神疾病的客户需求与因坚持基于绩效的资金投入和残疾就业政策而感到压力之间存在紧张关系。
更加强调基于证据的个性化职业干预措施将更好地与康复导向保持一致,并为患有精神疾病的求职者提供符合其需求和目标的职业选择。
残疾就业专家需要进一步的培训和系统支持,以便在与患有精神疾病的求职者合作时采用基于证据的实践方法。
由于澳大利亚残疾就业专家在实践中描述会考虑客户的“就业准备情况”,这一概念的实用性值得进一步研究。