Vitak Jessica, Zimmer Michael
University of Maryland, USA.
Marquette University, USA.
Soc Media Soc. 2020 Jul 30;6(3):2056305120948250. doi: 10.1177/2056305120948250. eCollection 2020 Jul.
The global coronavirus pandemic has raised important questions regarding how to balance public health concerns with privacy protections for individual citizens. In this essay, we evaluate contact tracing apps, which have been offered as a technological solution to minimize the spread of COVID-19. We argue that apps such as those built on Google and Apple's "exposure notification system" should be evaluated in terms of the contextual integrity of information flows; in other words, the appropriateness of sharing health and location data will be contextually dependent on factors such as who will have access to data, as well as the transmission principles underlying data transfer. We also consider the role of prevailing social and political values in this assessment, including the large-scale social benefits that can be obtained through such information sharing. However, caution should be taken in violating contextual integrity, even in the case of a pandemic, because it risks a long-term loss of autonomy and growing function creep for surveillance and monitoring technologies.
全球新冠疫情引发了一些重要问题,涉及如何在公众健康担忧与保护公民个人隐私之间取得平衡。在本文中,我们对接触者追踪应用程序进行评估,这些应用程序被视为一种技术解决方案,以尽量减少新冠病毒的传播。我们认为,像基于谷歌和苹果的“暴露通知系统”构建的那些应用程序,应该根据信息流的情境完整性来评估;换句话说,健康和位置数据共享的适当性将取决于诸如谁将能够访问数据以及数据传输所依据的传播原则等情境因素。我们还考虑了当前社会和政治价值观在这一评估中的作用,包括通过此类信息共享可获得的大规模社会效益。然而,即使在疫情期间,也应谨慎避免违反情境完整性,因为这可能导致长期的自主权丧失以及监视和监测技术功能的不断扩张。