Cohen Larry, Pappas Evangelos, Simic Milena, Refshauge Kathryn, Dennis Sarah
Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney: Susan Wakil Building, Western Avenue, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.
The University of Wollongong, Australia.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2021 Jul;33(7):554-559. doi: 10.1589/jpts.33.554. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
[Purpose] The sagittal shape of the spine is associated with back-pain, balance and quality of life. We developed, evaluated and report the responses of a graphical tool to assess sagittal spine shape knowledge (literacy). [Participants and Methods] Two hundred and fifty adults were randomly assigned, in a cross-sectional crossover study, to free-hand draw and select the "ideal" sagittal spine shape. We evaluated the inter and intra-rater reliability and agreement between tests and the sagittal and lordotic spine literacy between the drawing and selection test versions. [Results] Drawing test inter- and intra-rater agreement was 79% and 80% respectively. Drawing vs. selection agreement was 43%. More participants drew than selected the correct spine (30% vs. 21%) (p<0.001) and lumbar lordosis shape (56% vs. 42%) (p<0.001). Test order did not affect spine shape literacy scores. A significantly poorer literacy trend was observed with spine pain presence (p=0.02). [Conclusion] We developed a reliable method to evaluate spine shape literacy and established that only 21% and 42% of our sample demonstrated correct sagittal spine and lordotic spine shape literacy, respectively. The low literacy scores suggests that consideration of including spine shape literacy in health literacy and self-management programs may be warranted, especially in ageing populations.
[目的] 脊柱矢状面形态与背痛、平衡及生活质量相关。我们开发、评估并报告了一种用于评估脊柱矢状面形态知识(素养)的图形工具的反应情况。[参与者与方法] 在一项横断面交叉研究中,250名成年人被随机分配,进行徒手绘制并选择“理想的”脊柱矢状面形态。我们评估了评分者间和评分者内的可靠性以及测试之间的一致性,以及绘图和选择测试版本之间的矢状面和腰椎前凸脊柱素养。[结果] 绘图测试的评分者间和评分者内一致性分别为79%和80%。绘图与选择的一致性为43%。更多参与者绘制出而非选出正确的脊柱形态(30%对21%)(p<0.001)以及腰椎前凸形态(56%对42%)(p<0.001)。测试顺序不影响脊柱形态素养得分。存在脊柱疼痛时观察到明显较差的素养趋势(p=0.02)。[结论] 我们开发了一种可靠的方法来评估脊柱形态素养,并确定我们的样本中分别只有21%和42%的人展示出正确的脊柱矢状面和腰椎前凸形态素养。低素养得分表明可能有必要考虑将脊柱形态素养纳入健康素养和自我管理项目,尤其是在老年人群中。