Fan Gaojie, Carlson Krista D, Thomas Robin D
Center for Computation & Technology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States.
Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, United States.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 17;12:614280. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.614280. eCollection 2021.
Previous studies on human cognition show that people with different cultural backgrounds may differ in various ways. However, there are other unexplored possibilities for cultural differences including degree of handedness thought to reflect hemispheric coordination, reliance on verbal versus visual representation in problem solving, and working memory capacity both spatial and operational. We assessed each of these using the Edinburgh scale, a validated scale of style of processing, and two automatic working memory span tasks. Participants were either native Chinese students (who spoke Mandarin) or American students. Data showed that culture impacted the set of measures but gender did not and these factors did not interact. Chinese and American students showed the largest difference in their operational working memory. We also examined the pattern of correlations among the measures across the two groups and found differences due to cultural group as well.
以往关于人类认知的研究表明,具有不同文化背景的人可能在各种方面存在差异。然而,文化差异还有其他未被探索的可能性,包括被认为反映半球协调的用手习惯程度、在解决问题时对言语表征与视觉表征的依赖,以及空间和操作方面的工作记忆容量。我们使用爱丁堡量表(一种经过验证的加工方式量表)和两项自动工作记忆广度任务对上述每一项进行了评估。参与者要么是中国本土学生(说普通话),要么是美国学生。数据表明,文化影响了测量指标集,但性别没有影响,且这些因素没有相互作用。中国学生和美国学生在操作工作记忆方面表现出最大差异。我们还研究了两组测量指标之间的相关模式,发现文化群体之间也存在差异。