• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的免疫细胞谱和抗体反应。

Immune cell profiling and antibody responses in patients with COVID-19.

机构信息

Virology Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung diseases (NRITLD), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Pediatric Infectious Disease Research Center, Pediatrics Center of Excellence, Children's Medical Center Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Dr. Gharib Street, Keshavarz Boulevard, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 5;21(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06278-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12879-021-06278-2
PMID:34225645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8256640/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although there are a growing number of studies on evaluating lymphocyte subset counts as prognostic factors for COVID-19 disease severity, the lymphocyte subsets' analyses of both IgM and IgG responders and non-responders during the periods after onset of symptoms, have not been conducted yet. So, this study aimed to evaluate immune cell profiling of COVID-19 patients with and without antibody responses.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, the levels of peripheral lymphocyte subsets were measured using flow cytometry in 53 patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR, for whom antibody testing of COVID-19 was performed.

RESULTS

The white blood cell, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts consistently decreased in the IgM and IgG non-responder group, while the differences in the median value between the two study groups were found to be statistically significant only in terms of neutrophil counts (P = 0.024 for IgM response and p-value = 0.046 for IgG response, respectively). Moreover, the level of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was observed to be significantly lower in the IgM or IgG non-responder group compared to the IgM or IgG responder group (3.6 ± 3.1 vs. 6.3 ± 4.2; p-value = 0.021). The patients with IgM antibody response had a significantly lower CD20 lymphocytes (11% versus 15% in the groups without IgM antibody response, p-value = 0.031), The percentages of NK cells and CD4 T cells significantly increased in the patients with IgG antibody response compared to those without IgG antibody response (13% versus 10%, p-value = 0.028, and 41.5% versus 34%; p-value = 0.03, respectively). Moreover, the patients who produced IgM or IgG antibody had significantly higher percentages of total T lymphocytes (64% versus 54%; p-value = 0.017), CD4 T cells (41% versus 34%; p-value = 0.038), and NK cells (13% versus 9%, p-value = 0.023) compared to the group with no serological response. No significant difference was observed in the percentage of other lymphocyte subsets, including CD8 T cells, T cells, and CD19 B cells.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the total T cells, CD4 T cells, and NK cells percentages are linked to serological response. Moreover, our findings suggested that neutrophil absolute counts and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio may be valuable predictors of IgM or IgG antibody response.

摘要

背景

虽然有越来越多的研究评估淋巴细胞亚群计数作为 COVID-19 疾病严重程度的预后因素,但尚未对症状出现后 IgM 和 IgG 应答者和无应答者的淋巴细胞亚群进行分析。因此,本研究旨在评估有和无抗体应答的 COVID-19 患者的免疫细胞特征。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,对 53 例 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 阳性患者进行了外周血淋巴细胞亚群的流式细胞术检测,对这些患者进行了 COVID-19 抗体检测。

结果

IgM 和 IgG 无应答组的白细胞、中性粒细胞和淋巴细胞计数持续下降,而两组间中位数的差异仅在中性粒细胞计数方面具有统计学意义(IgM 应答时为 P=0.024,IgG 应答时为 p 值=0.046)。此外,与 IgM 或 IgG 应答组相比,IgM 或 IgG 无应答组的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值显著降低(3.6±3.1 比 6.3±4.2;p 值=0.021)。有 IgM 抗体应答的患者的 CD20 淋巴细胞明显较低(有 IgM 抗体应答组为 11%,无 IgM 抗体应答组为 15%,p 值=0.031),有 IgG 抗体应答的患者的 NK 细胞和 CD4 T 细胞百分比明显高于无 IgG 抗体应答的患者(13%比 10%,p 值=0.028 和 41.5%比 34%;p 值分别为 0.03 和 0.03)。此外,产生 IgM 或 IgG 抗体的患者的总 T 淋巴细胞(64%比 54%;p 值=0.017)、CD4 T 细胞(41%比 34%;p 值=0.038)和 NK 细胞(13%比 9%;p 值=0.023)的百分比明显高于无血清学反应的患者。其他淋巴细胞亚群(包括 CD8 T 细胞、T 细胞和 CD19 B 细胞)的百分比无显著差异。

结论

我们的结果表明,总 T 细胞、CD4 T 细胞和 NK 细胞百分比与血清学反应有关。此外,我们的研究结果表明,中性粒细胞绝对值和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值可能是 IgM 或 IgG 抗体反应的有价值预测指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/385a/8258958/f2faa9b10c13/12879_2021_6278_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/385a/8258958/b98666eb2d46/12879_2021_6278_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/385a/8258958/de9724647000/12879_2021_6278_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/385a/8258958/edcc53efa83a/12879_2021_6278_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/385a/8258958/f2faa9b10c13/12879_2021_6278_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/385a/8258958/b98666eb2d46/12879_2021_6278_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/385a/8258958/de9724647000/12879_2021_6278_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/385a/8258958/edcc53efa83a/12879_2021_6278_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/385a/8258958/f2faa9b10c13/12879_2021_6278_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Immune cell profiling and antibody responses in patients with COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的免疫细胞谱和抗体反应。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 5;21(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06278-2.
2
The dynamics of immune response in COVID-19 patients with different illness severity.不同疾病严重程度的 COVID-19 患者的免疫反应动力学。
J Med Virol. 2021 Feb;93(2):1070-1077. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26504. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
3
Sex-based clinical and immunological differences in COVID-19.COVID-19 中的基于性别的临床和免疫学差异。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 5;21(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06313-2.
4
Relationship between the dynamic changes of serum 2019-nCoV IgM/IgG and patient immunity after 6 month hospital discharge.血清 2019-nCoV IgM/IgG 动态变化与患者出院后 6 个月内免疫力的关系。
Inflamm Res. 2021 Feb;70(2):241-247. doi: 10.1007/s00011-020-01429-8. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
5
Kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 Specific and Neutralizing Antibodies over Seven Months after Symptom Onset in COVID-19 Patients.COVID-19 患者症状出现后七个月内 SARS-CoV-2 特异性和中和抗体的动力学。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0059021. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00590-21. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
6
Over 1-year duration and age difference of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in convalescent COVID-19 patients.SARS-CoV-2 抗体在康复期 COVID-19 患者中的 1 年以上持续时间和年龄差异。
J Med Virol. 2021 Dec;93(12):6506-6511. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27152. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
7
Monitoring Specific IgM and IgG Production Among Severe COVID-19 Patients Using Qualitative and Quantitative Immunodiagnostic Assays: A Retrospective Cohort Study.利用定性和定量免疫诊断检测监测重症 COVID-19 患者的特异性 IgM 和 IgG 产生:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Immunol. 2021 Sep 3;12:705441. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.705441. eCollection 2021.
8
Clinical diagnostic performance evaluation of five immunoassays for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in a real-life routine care setting.五种用于 SARS-CoV-2 抗体诊断的免疫分析方法在真实临床常规检测环境中的临床诊断性能评估。
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 May 3;39:3. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.3.26471. eCollection 2021.
9
Evaluation of the Levels of Peripheral CD3, CD4, and CD8 T Cells and IgG and IgM Antibodies in COVID-19 Patients at Different Stages of Infection.评价不同感染阶段 COVID-19 患者外周血 CD3、CD4、CD8 T 细胞及 IgG、IgM 抗体水平。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0084521. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00845-21.
10
Characterization of antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in convalescent COVID-19 patients.对 COVID-19 恢复期患者体内 SARS-CoV-2 抗体反应的特征描述。
J Med Virol. 2021 Apr;93(4):2227-2233. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26646. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-discharge follow-up of pediatric COVID-19 patients: insights into serological dynamics.儿童新冠病毒肺炎患者出院后的随访:血清学动态分析
Front Microbiol. 2024 Jul 9;15:1427327. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1427327. eCollection 2024.
2
Hematological, inflammatory, and novel biomarkers assessment as an eminent strategy for clinical management of COVID-19.血液学、炎症及新型生物标志物评估作为新冠病毒疾病临床管理的一项重要策略。
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 28;9(12):e22896. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22896. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
A novel highly specific biotinylated MAC-ELISA for detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen IgM antibodies during the acute phase of COVID-19.

本文引用的文献

1
The dynamics of immune response in COVID-19 patients with different illness severity.不同疾病严重程度的 COVID-19 患者的免疫反应动力学。
J Med Virol. 2021 Feb;93(2):1070-1077. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26504. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
2
Humoral Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 in Iceland.冰岛人针对 SARS-CoV-2 的体液免疫反应。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 29;383(18):1724-1734. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2026116. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
3
Natural killer cell immunotypes related to COVID-19 disease severity.与 COVID-19 疾病严重程度相关的自然杀伤细胞免疫表型。
一种新型高度特异性生物素化 MAC-ELISA,用于检测 COVID-19 急性期中抗 SARS-CoV-2 核衣壳抗原 IgM 抗体。
Braz J Microbiol. 2023 Dec;54(4):2893-2901. doi: 10.1007/s42770-023-01160-6. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
4
Mixed storm in SARS-CoV-2 infection: A narrative review and new term in the Covid-19 era.SARS-CoV-2 感染中的混合性炎症风暴:Covid-19 时代的叙述性综述和新术语。
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2023 Apr;11(4):e838. doi: 10.1002/iid3.838.
5
Plasma proteomics of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severity reveals impact on Alzheimer's and coronary disease pathways.新型冠状病毒感染与严重程度的血浆蛋白质组学揭示了对阿尔茨海默病和冠心病通路的影响。
iScience. 2023 Apr 21;26(4):106408. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106408. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
6
Adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review.对 SARS-CoV-2 感染的适应性免疫:系统综述。
Front Immunol. 2022 Oct 10;13:1001198. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1001198. eCollection 2022.
7
Plasma proteomics of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severity reveals impact on Alzheimer and coronary disease pathways.新型冠状病毒感染与严重程度的血浆蛋白质组学揭示了对阿尔茨海默病和冠心病通路的影响。
medRxiv. 2022 Jul 25:2022.07.25.22278025. doi: 10.1101/2022.07.25.22278025.
8
Characteristics and Prognosis of Antibody Non-responders With Coronavirus Disease 2019.2019冠状病毒病抗体无应答者的特征与预后
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 20;9:813820. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.813820. eCollection 2022.
9
Exploring the Utility of NK Cells in COVID-19.探索自然杀伤细胞在新型冠状病毒肺炎中的作用
Biomedicines. 2022 Apr 26;10(5):1002. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10051002.
10
The Fluctuation Trend of Serum Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG Antibodies Seroprevalence in the Non-COVID-19 Infected Population and Correlation with Peripheral Blood Leukocyte Parameters in Beijing, China, 2021: A Real-World Study.2021年中国北京非新冠病毒感染人群血清抗SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG抗体血清流行率的波动趋势及其与外周血白细胞参数的相关性:一项真实世界研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Apr 7;10(4):571. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10040571.
Sci Immunol. 2020 Aug 21;5(50). doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abd6832.
4
Host urine immunological biomarkers as potential candidates for the diagnosis of tuberculosis.宿主尿液免疫生物标志物作为结核病诊断的潜在候选物。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;99:473-481. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.08.019. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
5
Immune Phenotyping Based on the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and IgG Level Predicts Disease Severity and Outcome for Patients With COVID-19.基于中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和IgG水平的免疫表型分析可预测COVID-19患者的疾病严重程度和预后。
Front Mol Biosci. 2020 Jul 3;7:157. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2020.00157. eCollection 2020.
6
Flattening the COVID-19 Curve With Natural Killer Cell Based Immunotherapies.用基于自然杀伤细胞的免疫疗法来平缓 COVID-19 曲线。
Front Immunol. 2020 Jun 23;11:1512. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01512. eCollection 2020.
7
Immunologic Features in Coronavirus Disease 2019: Functional Exhaustion of T Cells and Cytokine Storm.2019年冠状病毒病的免疫学特征:T细胞功能耗竭与细胞因子风暴
J Clin Immunol. 2020 Oct;40(7):974-976. doi: 10.1007/s10875-020-00824-4. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
8
Antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients.COVID-19患者针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的抗体反应。
J Med Virol. 2021 Jan;93(1):144-148. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26241. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
9
CD4+T, CD8+T counts and severe COVID-19: A meta-analysis.CD4+T、CD8+T细胞计数与重症新型冠状病毒肺炎:一项荟萃分析。
J Infect. 2020 Sep;81(3):e82-e84. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.06.036. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
10
Immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and mechanisms of immunopathological changes in COVID-19.针对 SARS-CoV-2 的免疫反应和 COVID-19 中免疫病理变化的机制。
Allergy. 2020 Jul;75(7):1564-1581. doi: 10.1111/all.14364.