• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较扫频源与谱域光相干断层扫描血管造影术在检测黄斑新生血管中的应用。

Comparison of swept-source versus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography for detection of macular neovascularization.

机构信息

Cologne Image Reading Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Department of Ophthalmology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, University of Witten-Herdecke, Wuppertal, Germany.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;260(1):113-119. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05229-6. Epub 2021 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00417-021-05229-6
PMID:34226972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8763780/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare swept-source (SS) versus spectral-domain (SD) optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) for the detection of macular neovascularization (MNV).

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, 72 eyes of 54 patients with subretinal hyperreflective material (SHRM) and/or pigment epithelial detachment (PED) on OCT possibly corresponding to MNV in at least one eye were included. OCTA scans were acquired using two devices, the PLEX Elite 9000 SS-OCTA and the Spectralis SD-OCTA. Fluorescein angiography (FA) was used as reference. Two graders independently evaluated en face OCTA images using a preset slab as well as a manually modified slab, followed by a combination of en face and cross-sectional OCTA.

RESULTS

Sensitivity (specificity) for the automated slabs was 51.7% (93.0%) for SS-OCTA versus 58.6% (95.3%) for SD-OCTA. Manual modification of segmentation increased sensitivity to 79.3% for SS-OCTA but not for SD-OCTA (58.6%). The combination of en face OCTA with cross-sectional OCTA reached highest sensitivity values (SS-OCTA: 82.8%, SD-OCTA: 86.2%), and lowest number of cases with discrepancies between SS-OCTA and SD-OCTA (4.2%). Fleiss kappa as measure of concordance between FA, SS-OCTA, and SD-OCTA was 0.56 for the automated slabs, 0.60 for the manual slabs, and 0.73 (good agreement) for the combination of en face OCTA with cross-sectional OCTA. Concordance to FA was moderate for the automated slabs and good for manual slabs and combination with cross-sectional OCTA of both devices.

CONCLUSION

Both devices reached comparable results regarding the detection of MNV on OCTA. Sensitivity for MNV detection and agreement between devices was best when evaluating a combination of en face and cross-sectional OCTA.

摘要

目的

比较扫频源(SS)与谱域(SD)光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCTA)在检测黄斑新生血管(MNV)中的作用。

方法

在这项前瞻性队列研究中,纳入了 72 只眼 54 例患者的视网膜下高反射物质(SHRM)和/或 OCT 上的色素上皮脱离(PED),这些患者的至少一只眼存在可能与 MNV 相对应的物质。使用两种设备(PLEX Elite 9000 SS-OCTA 和 Spectralis SD-OCTA)采集 OCTA 扫描。使用预设平板和手动修改平板,对平面 OCTA 图像进行了两位分级评估,然后结合平面和横断面 OCTA。

结果

自动平板的 SS-OCTA 敏感性(特异性)为 51.7%(93.0%),SD-OCTA 为 58.6%(95.3%)。对分割的手动修改将 SS-OCTA 的敏感性提高到 79.3%,但 SD-OCTA 没有(58.6%)。平面 OCTA 与横断面 OCTA 的结合达到了最高的敏感性值(SS-OCTA:82.8%,SD-OCTA:86.2%),并且 SS-OCTA 和 SD-OCTA 之间差异的病例数最少(4.2%)。FA、SS-OCTA 和 SD-OCTA 之间一致性的 Fleiss kappa 测量值为自动平板的 0.56,手动平板的 0.60,以及平面 OCTA 与横断面 OCTA 的组合的 0.73(良好一致性)。自动平板的 FA 一致性为中度,手动平板和两种设备的平面 OCTA 与横断面 OCTA 的组合均为良好。

结论

两种设备在 OCTA 上检测 MNV 方面均取得了相当的结果。当评估平面和横断面 OCTA 的组合时,MNV 检测的敏感性和设备之间的一致性最佳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1c6/8763780/0d36101253c2/417_2021_5229_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1c6/8763780/0d36101253c2/417_2021_5229_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1c6/8763780/0d36101253c2/417_2021_5229_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of swept-source versus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography for detection of macular neovascularization.比较扫频源与谱域光相干断层扫描血管造影术在检测黄斑新生血管中的应用。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;260(1):113-119. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05229-6. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
2
Optical coherence tomography angiography for the detection of macular neovascularization-comparison of en face versus cross-sectional view.光学相干断层扫描血管造影在黄斑新生血管检测中的应用—— 面与横截面视图的比较。
Eye (Lond). 2023 Feb;37(2):256-262. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01892-5. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
3
Comparison of Automated versus Manually Modified OCT Angiography En Face Slabs for Detection of Choroidal Neovascularization.自动与手动修改 OCT 血管造影额状面切片检测脉络膜新生血管的比较。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 May;4(5):471-480. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.11.018. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
4
Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Macular Neovascularization: A Comparison Between Different OCTA Devices.光学相干断层扫描血管造影在黄斑新生血管中的应用:不同光学相干断层扫描血管造影设备的比较
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Oct 7;9(11):6. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.11.6. eCollection 2020 Oct.
5
IMPROVED DETECTION AND DIAGNOSIS OF POLYPOIDAL CHOROIDAL VASCULOPATHY USING A COMBINATION OF OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY AND OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY.采用光学相干断层扫描和光学相干断层扫描血管造影相结合的方法提高息肉状脉络膜血管病变的检测和诊断。
Retina. 2019 Sep;39(9):1655-1663. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002228.
6
Comparison of macular neovascularization lesion size by the use of Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography versus Indocyanine Green Angiography.应用谱域光学相干断层血管造影术和扫频源光学相干断层血管造影术与吲哚菁绿血管造影术比较黄斑新生血管病变大小。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar;99(2):e260-e266. doi: 10.1111/aos.14572. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
7
Choroidal Neovascularization Analyzed on Ultrahigh-Speed Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Compared to Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.与频域光学相干断层扫描血管造影术相比,基于超高速度扫频源光学相干断层扫描血管造影术分析脉络膜新生血管。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;164:80-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
8
SWEPT-SOURCE AND SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY VERSUS DYE ANGIOGRAPHY IN THE MEASUREMENT OF TYPE 1 NEOVASCULARIZATION.扫频源和谱域光相干断层血管成像与染料血管造影在 1 型新生血管测量中的比较。
Retina. 2020 Mar;40(3):499-506. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002452.
9
CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULAR AREA AND VESSEL DENSITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SWEPT-SOURCE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY DEVICES.两种扫频源光学相干断层血管成像设备的脉络膜新生血管区和血管密度比较。
Retina. 2020 Mar;40(3):521-528. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002430.
10
Clinical evaluation of neovascular and non-neovascular chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) diagnosed by swept source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS OCTA).经扫频源光学相干断层扫描血管造影(SS OCTA)诊断的新生血管性和非新生血管性慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变(CSC)的临床评估
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug;257(8):1581-1590. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04297-z. Epub 2019 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
"Setting the standard": an analysis of different acquisition patterns for macular OCT-angiography.“设定标准”:黄斑光学相干断层扫描血管造影不同采集模式的分析
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2025 Mar 13;11(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40942-025-00653-w.
2
Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography as a Diagnostic Tool for Diabetic Retinopathy.光学相干断层扫描血管造影术作为糖尿病视网膜病变的诊断工具
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Feb 2;14(3):326. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14030326.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Automated versus Manually Modified OCT Angiography En Face Slabs for Detection of Choroidal Neovascularization.自动与手动修改 OCT 血管造影额状面切片检测脉络膜新生血管的比较。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 May;4(5):471-480. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.11.018. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
2
CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULAR AREA AND VESSEL DENSITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SWEPT-SOURCE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY DEVICES.两种扫频源光学相干断层血管成像设备的脉络膜新生血管区和血管密度比较。
Retina. 2020 Mar;40(3):521-528. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002430.
3
VISUALIZATION OF CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION USING TWO COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY DEVICES.
利用两种商用谱域光学相干断层扫描血管造影设备观察脉络膜新生血管。
Retina. 2019 Sep;39(9):1682-1692. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002241.
4
Imaging the Deep Choroidal Vasculature Using Spectral Domain and Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.使用光谱域和扫频源光学相干断层扫描血管造影术对脉络膜深层血管系统进行成像。
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2018 May-Jun;2(3):146-154. doi: 10.1177/2474126418771805. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
5
Optical coherence tomography angiography.光学相干断层扫描血管造影术。
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018 May;64:1-55. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
6
Sensitivity and Specificity of OCT Angiography to Detect Choroidal Neovascularization.光学相干断层扫描血管造影检测脉络膜新生血管的敏感性和特异性
Ophthalmol Retina. 2017 Jul-Aug;1(4):294-303. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2017.02.007.
7
[Accurate OCT-angiography Interpretation - Detection and Exclusion of Artifacts].[准确的光学相干断层扫描血管造影解读——伪影的检测与排除]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2017 Sep;234(9):1109-1118. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-112857. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
8
Projection artifact removal improves visualization and quantitation of macular neovascularization imaged by optical coherence tomography angiography.投影伪影去除可改善光学相干断层扫描血管造影成像的黄斑新生血管的可视化和定量分析。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2017 Mar-Apr;1(2):124-136. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2016.08.005.
9
Quantitative Comparison of Swept-Source and Spectral-Domain OCT Angiography in Healthy Eyes.健康眼睛中扫频源光学相干断层扫描血管造影与谱域光学相干断层扫描血管造影的定量比较
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017 May 1;48(5):385-391. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20170428-04.
10
Automated Quantitation of Choroidal Neovascularization: A Comparison Study Between Spectral-Domain and Swept-Source OCT Angiograms.脉络膜新生血管的自动定量分析:频域与扫频光学相干断层扫描血管造影的比较研究
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Mar 1;58(3):1506-1513. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-20977.