系统评价：结构、形式和内容。
Systematic reviews: Structure, form and content.
机构信息
University of Cambridge Medical Library, Cambridge, UK.
出版信息
J Perioper Pract. 2021 Sep;31(9):349-353. doi: 10.1177/1750458921994693. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
Abstract
This article aims to provide an overview of the structure, form and content of systematic reviews. It focuses in particular on the literature searching component, and covers systematic database searching techniques, searching for grey literature and the importance of librarian involvement in the search. It also covers systematic review reporting standards such as PRISMA-P and PRISMA, critical appraisal and tools and resources to support the review and ensure it is conducted efficiently and effectively. Finally, it summarizes the requirements when screening search results for inclusion in the review, and the statistical synthesis of included studies' findings.
摘要
本文旨在概述系统评价的结构、形式和内容。它特别侧重于文献检索部分，涵盖了系统数据库检索技术、灰色文献搜索以及图书馆员参与搜索的重要性。它还涵盖了系统评价报告标准，如 PRISMA-P 和 PRISMA，评价工具和资源，以支持和确保高效、有效地进行评价。最后，总结了纳入评价的检索结果筛选要求，以及纳入研究结果的统计综合。
相似文献
1
Systematic reviews: Structure, form and content.系统评价：结构、形式和内容。
J Perioper Pract. 2021 Sep;31(9):349-353. doi: 10.1177/1750458921994693. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区，服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中，叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树：影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Methodological and reporting quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the association between sleep duration and hypertension.系统评价和荟萃分析在睡眠时间与高血压关联中的方法学和报告质量评估。
Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 6;13(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02622-0.
5
Systematic review search methods evaluated using the Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews tool.使用系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目和系统评价中的偏倚风险工具对系统评价检索方法进行评估。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Dec 7;37:e18. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320002135.
6
Compliance of systematic reviews in veterinary journals with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) literature search reporting guidelines.兽医期刊中系统评价对系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目（PRISMA）文献检索报告指南的遵循情况。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Jul;105(3):233-239. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.246. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
7
Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement.诊断测试准确性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目：PRISMA-DTA 声明。
JAMA. 2018 Jan 23;319(4):388-396. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19163.
8
Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.在医疗保健干预随机试验的系统评价中，因对结果和分析进行选择性纳入及报告而产生的偏倚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 1;2014(10):MR000035. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000035.pub2.
9
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD Statement.个体参与者数据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目：PRISMA-IPD 声明。
JAMA. 2015 Apr 28;313(16):1657-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3656.
10
Compliance of systematic reviews articles in brain arteriovenous malformation with PRISMA statement guidelines: Review of literature.脑动静脉畸形系统评价文章对PRISMA声明指南的依从性：文献综述
J Clin Neurosci. 2017 May;39:45-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
引用本文的文献
1
Critical Assessment of Large Language Models' (ChatGPT) Performance in Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews: Exploratory Study.大型语言模型（ChatGPT）在系统评价数据提取中的性能批判性评估：探索性研究
JMIR AI. 2025 Sep 11;4:e68097. doi: 10.2196/68097.
2
Live Hospice Discharge of Individuals with Cognitive Disabilities: A Systematic Review.认知障碍患者的临终关怀出院：一项系统评价
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2025 Jun;26(6):105578. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105578. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
3
Validity of using a semi-automated screening tool in a systematic review assessing non-specific effects of respiratory vaccines.在一项评估呼吸道疫苗非特异性效应的系统评价中使用半自动筛查工具的有效性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Mar 6;25(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02511-7.
4
Effectiveness of Universal Community Engagement Childhood Obesity Interventions at Improving Weight-Related and Behavioral Outcomes among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.普及社区参与式儿童肥胖干预措施在改善儿童和青少年体重相关和行为结果方面的有效性：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutrients. 2024 Oct 12;16(20):3465. doi: 10.3390/nu16203465.
5
How to influence and cultivate young adults' life purpose in the process of education: a systematic review of empirical studies.如何在教育过程中影响和培养年轻人的生活目标：实证研究的系统评价。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Oct 15;12(1):554. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02003-1.
6
Predictors of perinatal mortality in Ghana: a systematic review protocol.加纳围产儿死亡的预测因素：系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 30;14(9):e080527. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080527.
7
The use of naltrexone in the treatment of chronic pain: a systematic review.纳曲酮治疗慢性疼痛的应用：系统评价。
Pain Manag. 2024;14(8):453-463. doi: 10.1080/17581869.2024.2401769. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
8
Systematic reviews: Not always a pain.系统评价：并非总是痛苦之事。
Interv Pain Med. 2022 Aug 15;1(Suppl 2):100128. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100128. eCollection 2022.
9
Nursing experiences in specialized services in child and adolescent mental health: a systematic review of qualitative studies.儿童和青少年心理健康专科服务中的护理经验：定性研究的系统评价。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2023 Dec 8;76Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e20220550. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0550. eCollection 2023.
10
Older adults' experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative systematic literature review.老年人在 COVID-19 大流行期间的体验：一项定性系统文献综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Sep 20;23(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04282-6.
本文引用的文献
1
An assessment of the quality of current clinical meta-analyses.当前临床荟萃分析质量评估。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 7;20(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00999-9.
2
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2：修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
3
A review of recent publication trends from top publishing countries.对顶级出版国家近期出版趋势的回顾。
Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 27;7(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0819-1.
4
Increasing the Incidence and Influence of Systematic Reviews on Health Policy and Practice.提高系统评价对卫生政策和实践的发生率及影响力。
Am J Public Health. 2016 Jan;106(1):11-3. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302915. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
5
Use of recommended search strategies in systematic reviews and the impact of librarian involvement: a cross-sectional survey of recent authors.系统评价中推荐检索策略的使用及图书馆员参与的影响：对近期作者的横断面调查
PLoS One. 2015 May 4;10(5):e0125931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125931. eCollection 2015.
6
Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews.图书馆员共同作者与一般内科系统评价中报告的高质量搜索策略相关。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;68(6):617-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
7
[Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing and publication of scholarly work in medical journals].[关于医学期刊中学术作品的撰写、报告、编辑及发表的建议]
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2014 Oct;22(10):781-91.
8
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目（PRISMA-P）2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
9
Network meta-analyses could be improved by searching more sources and by involving a librarian.网络荟萃分析可以通过搜索更多的来源和引入图书管理员来改进。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Sep;67(9):1001-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 May 17.
10
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目：PRISMA声明
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
Zotero 插件