Fogarty Alexandra E, Conger Aaron, Burnham Taylor
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Interv Pain Med. 2022 Aug 15;1(Suppl 2):100128. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100128. eCollection 2022.
Systematic reviews analyze the evidence surrounding a specific intervention within a population. High quality systematic reviews can help clinicians and policymakers accurately understand a treatment intervention. This article outlines the basic principles of systematic review development, including assembling a research team, defining the research question, publishing a protocol, designing and executing the search, study selection, extracting the data, assessing risk of bias, synthesizing the data and conducting a certainty assessment. In addition, we will address common pitfalls and highlight special considerations for the field of interventional pain medicine. Understanding systematic review methodology will help investigators improve their primary research and in turn, better primary literature will improve the value of high quality reviews.
系统评价分析人群中围绕特定干预措施的证据。高质量的系统评价有助于临床医生和政策制定者准确理解一种治疗干预措施。本文概述了系统评价制定的基本原则，包括组建研究团队、确定研究问题、发表方案、设计和执行检索、选择研究、提取数据、评估偏倚风险、综合数据以及进行确定性评估。此外，我们将探讨常见的陷阱，并强调介入性疼痛医学领域的特殊注意事项。理解系统评价方法将有助于研究人员改进其原始研究，反过来，更好的原始文献将提高高质量评价的价值。
