Ditrich Ismene, Philipsen Alexandra, Matthies Swantje
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center -Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hauptstr. 5, D-79104, Freiburg, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2021 Jul 6;8(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40479-021-00162-w.
Overlap in symptom domains particularly in the field of impulsivity and emotional dysregulation in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) have stimulated further research activities since our last review from 2014.
Disentangling features of impulsivity in ADHD and BPD revealed that impulsivity is a feature of both disorders with patients suffering from both ADHD and BPD having highest impulsivity ratings. BPD individuals have more problems using context cues for inhibiting responses and their impulsivity is stress-dependent, whereas ADHD patients have more motor impulsivity and therefore difficulties interrupting ongoing responses. For emotion regulation difficulties the ranking order ranges from ADHD to BPD to the comorbid condition, again with the patients suffering from both, ADHD and BPD, having the most pronounced emotion regulation problems. Environmental influences namely adverse childhood events were shown to be linked to both ADHD and BPD. Traumatic experiences seem independently linked to impulsivity features. Thus, some authors point to the risk of misdiagnosis during childhood and the necessity to screen for traumatic experiences in both patient groups. Genetic research confirmed genetic overlap of BPD with bipolar disorder (BD) and schizophrenic disorders, as well as genetic overlap of BD and ADHD. A population-based study confirmed the high co-occurrence and familial co-aggregation of ADHD and BPD. Interesting questions in the field of gene-environment-interactions are currently dealt with by genetic and epigenetic research. Few studies have investigated treatment strategies for the comorbid condition, though the issue is highly important for the management of patients suffering from both disorders and presenting with the highest symptom scores.
Research on the different impulsivity features might point to a necessity of disorder-specific treatment strategies in the field of impulse control. Future research is needed to base treatment decisions for the comorbid condition on an evidence basis.
自我们2014年上次综述以来,注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和边缘型人格障碍(BPD)在症状领域的重叠,尤其是在冲动性和情绪调节障碍方面,激发了更多的研究活动。
对ADHD和BPD中冲动性特征的剖析表明,冲动性是这两种障碍的一个特征,同时患有ADHD和BPD的患者冲动性评分最高。BPD个体在利用情境线索抑制反应方面存在更多问题,且其冲动性与压力有关,而ADHD患者有更多的运动冲动性,因此在中断正在进行的反应方面存在困难。对于情绪调节困难,排序从ADHD到BPD再到共病情况,同样,同时患有ADHD和BPD的患者情绪调节问题最为明显。环境影响,即不良童年事件,被证明与ADHD和BPD都有关联。创伤经历似乎独立地与冲动性特征相关。因此,一些作者指出儿童期误诊的风险以及在这两个患者群体中筛查创伤经历的必要性。基因研究证实了BPD与双相情感障碍(BD)和精神分裂症的基因重叠,以及BD和ADHD的基因重叠。一项基于人群的研究证实了ADHD和BPD的高共现率和家族共聚集性。基因与环境相互作用领域的有趣问题目前正由基因和表观遗传学研究进行探讨。很少有研究调查共病情况的治疗策略,尽管这个问题对于同时患有这两种障碍且症状评分最高的患者的管理非常重要。
对不同冲动性特征的研究可能表明在冲动控制领域需要针对特定障碍的治疗策略。未来的研究需要以证据为基础为共病情况做出治疗决策。