Arifin Saru, Wicaksono Sonny S, Sumarto Slamet, Martitah Martitah, Sulistianingsih Dewi
Department of Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia.
Department of Criminal Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia.
Jamba. 2021 Jun 23;13(1):1021. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v13i1.1021. eCollection 2021.
This article will address the disaster resilience village (DRV) approach as a disaster preparedness method in Indonesia. This scheme became operational in 2012, exactly 5 years after disaster management legislation was passed in 2007. This DRV strategy is a component of the central government's decentralisation of disaster management to local governments. Using a method of doctrinal legal review, this study argues that the DRV approach to disaster preparedness at the village level is inefficient. That is because the village apparatus is the central player in this DRV, but residents of disaster-prone areas are regarded as an afterthought when it comes to disaster management. Consequently, efforts to strengthen emergency preparedness for residents in disaster-prone areas will be harmed. As a result, it is unsurprising that whenever a disaster occurs in Indonesia, the death toll and damage to property remain high. This is because people who live in disaster-prone areas lack a framework for transforming knowledge and scientific experience with disasters. In addition, this DRV strategy opposes previous disaster experts' community-based and transformative approaches. However, direct field research on communities living in disaster-prone areas is needed to obtain empirical evidence of the DRV approach's shortcomings.
本文将探讨作为印度尼西亚备灾方法的抗灾村(DRV)模式。该计划于2012年开始实施,正好是在2007年通过灾害管理立法后的5年。这种DRV战略是中央政府将灾害管理权力下放给地方政府的一个组成部分。通过教义性法律审查方法,本研究认为,村庄层面的DRV备灾方法效率低下。这是因为村级机构是DRV的核心参与者,但在灾害管理方面,易受灾地区的居民却被视为事后才考虑的因素。因此,加强易受灾地区居民应急准备的努力将受到损害。结果,每当印度尼西亚发生灾害时,死亡人数和财产损失仍然很高,这也就不足为奇了。这是因为生活在易受灾地区的人们缺乏将与灾害相关的知识和科学经验进行转化的框架。此外,这种DRV战略与先前灾害专家基于社区和变革性的方法背道而驰。然而,需要对生活在易受灾地区的社区进行直接实地研究,以获取DRV方法缺点的实证证据。