• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《气候缓解挑战——我们处于什么位置?》

The Climate Mitigation Challenge-Where Do We Stand?

机构信息

USEPA, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2021 Oct;71(10):1234-1250. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2021.1948458.

DOI:10.1080/10962247.2021.1948458
PMID:34233128
Abstract

Greenhouse gas emissions, driven by population growth and an increasing demand for resource-intensive goods, foods and services, are altering the planet's climate in ways that threaten the habitability of the planet. Transparent modeling tools and recent literature are used to quantify the mitigation challenge and assess potential remedies. Model results identify mitigation actions needed to have a chance of limiting global warming to 2 C, and how difficult it will be to limit warming to 1.5 C. Since a recent study concluded that there could be "runaway," irreversible warming when global temperatures reach 2 C or higher, this would argue for the importance of limiting warming to 1.5 C, despite the difficulty in meeting such a target. Serious emission reductions must start as soon as possible, involve all countries, include emission reductions in all sectors and for all the greenhouse gases. For achieving the 1.5 C target, and probably to meet the 2 C target, Carbon Dioxide removal (CDR) technologies/practices will need to be operational at large scale. Unfortunately, given their early stage of development, and high projected costs, there is no guarantee that removing CO2 from the air will be practical at the scale needed. For the U.S., a unique model examines key impactful mitigation actions and quantifies the monumental challenge of achieving net zero emissions by 2050. Also examined are the different mitigation trajectories needed for developed versus developing countries, how different emission trajectories would affect warming this century, and a summary of the status of R, D&D needs for key technologies. The two most impactful global mitigative actions, are to implement a strong, escalating price on carbon and greatly expanding R, D&D on promising clean energy and CDR technologies.: Humanity continues on its unsustainable trajectory. Greenhouse gas emissions, driven by population growth and an increasing demand for resource-intensive goods, foods and services are altering the planet's climate in ways that threaten the habitability of the planet. Transparent modeling tools and recent literature are used to quantify the mitigation challenge and assess potential remedies. Model results identify mitigation actions needed to have a chance of limiting global warming to 2 C, and how difficult it will be to limit warming to 1.5 C. Since a recent study, concluded there could be "runaway," irreversible warming when global temperatures reach 2 C or higher, this would argue for the importance limiting warming to 1.5 C, despite the difficulty in meeting such a target. Serious emission reductions must start as soon as possible, involve all countries, include emission reductions in all sectors and for all the greenhouse gases. For achieving the 1.5 C target, and probably to meet the 2 C target, Carbon Dioxide removal (CDR) technologies/practices will need to be operational at large scale. Unfortunately, given their early stage of development, and high projected costs, there is no guarantee that removing CO2 from the air will be practical at the scale needed. For the U.S., a unique model examines key impactful mitigation actions and quantifies the monumental challenge of achieving net zero emissions by 2050. Also examined are the different mitigation trajectories needed for developed versus developing countries, how different emission trajectories would affect warming this century, and a summary of the status of R, D&D needs for key technologies. It was concluded that the two most important global mitigative actions are to implement a strong, escalating price on carbon and greatly expanding R, D&D on promising clean energy and CDR technologies.

摘要

温室气体排放,由人口增长和对资源密集型商品、食品和服务的需求不断增加所驱动,正在以威胁地球宜居性的方式改变地球的气候。透明的建模工具和最近的文献被用来量化减排挑战,并评估潜在的补救措施。模型结果确定了为有机会将全球变暖限制在 2°C 而需要采取的减排措施,以及将变暖限制在 1.5°C 有多困难。由于最近的一项研究得出结论,当全球气温达到 2°C 或更高时,可能会出现“失控”的、不可逆转的变暖,这将论证将变暖限制在 1.5°C 的重要性,尽管实现这一目标存在困难。严重的减排必须尽快开始,涉及所有国家,包括所有部门和所有温室气体的减排。为了实现 1.5°C 的目标,而且可能为了实现 2°C 的目标,二氧化碳去除(CDR)技术/实践将需要大规模运行。不幸的是,考虑到它们处于早期开发阶段,以及预计成本高昂,不能保证从空气中去除二氧化碳在所需的规模上是可行的。对于美国,一个独特的模型检查了关键的减排措施,并量化了到 2050 年实现净零排放的巨大挑战。还研究了发达国家和发展中国家所需的不同减排轨迹,不同的排放轨迹将如何影响本世纪的变暖,以及对关键技术的研发需求的概述。两项最重要的全球减排措施是实施强有力的、不断升级的碳价格,并大力扩大对有前途的清洁能源和 CDR 技术的研发。人类继续沿着不可持续的轨迹前进。温室气体排放,由人口增长和对资源密集型商品、食品和服务的需求不断增加所驱动,正在以威胁地球宜居性的方式改变地球的气候。透明的建模工具和最近的文献被用来量化减排挑战,并评估潜在的补救措施。模型结果确定了为有机会将全球变暖限制在 2°C 而需要采取的减排措施,以及将变暖限制在 1.5°C 有多困难。由于最近的一项研究得出结论,当全球气温达到 2°C 或更高时,可能会出现“失控”的、不可逆转的变暖,这将论证将变暖限制在 1.5°C 的重要性,尽管实现这一目标存在困难。严重的减排必须尽快开始,涉及所有国家,包括所有部门和所有温室气体的减排。为了实现 1.5°C 的目标,而且可能为了实现 2°C 的目标,二氧化碳去除(CDR)技术/实践将需要大规模运行。不幸的是,考虑到它们处于早期开发阶段,以及预计成本高昂,不能保证从空气中去除二氧化碳在所需的规模上是可行的。对于美国,一个独特的模型检查了关键的减排措施,并量化了到 2050 年实现净零排放的巨大挑战。还研究了发达国家和发展中国家所需的不同减排轨迹,不同的排放轨迹将如何影响本世纪的变暖,以及对关键技术的研发需求的概述。两项最重要的全球减排措施是实施强有力的、不断升级的碳价格,并大力扩大对有前途的清洁能源和 CDR 技术的研发。

相似文献

1
The Climate Mitigation Challenge-Where Do We Stand?《气候缓解挑战——我们处于什么位置?》
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2021 Oct;71(10):1234-1250. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2021.1948458.
2
Global climate change: the quantifiable sustainability challenge.全球气候变化:可量化的可持续性挑战。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2014 Sep;64(9):979-94. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2014.923351.
3
Global climate change and the mitigation challenge.全球气候变化与减缓挑战。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2009 Oct;59(10):1194-211. doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.59.10.1194.
4
Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).减少废弃物产生的全球温室气体排放:政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)第四次评估报告的结论与策略。第三工作组(减缓气候变化)
Waste Manag Res. 2008 Feb;26(1):11-32. doi: 10.1177/0734242X07088433.
5
How much do direct livestock emissions actually contribute to global warming?直接牲畜排放对全球变暖的实际贡献有多大?
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Apr;24(4):1749-1761. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13975. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
6
Retrospective and projected warming-equivalent emissions from global livestock and cattle calculated with an alternative climate metric denoted GWP.用替代气候指标 GWP 计算的全球畜牧业和牛类的回溯和预计变暖等效排放量。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 2;18(10):e0288341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288341. eCollection 2023.
7
Analysis of the Emergent Climate Change Mitigation Technologies.分析新兴的气候变化缓解技术。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 24;18(13):6767. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136767.
8
Prospects for future climate change and the reasons for early action.未来气候变化的前景及早期行动的原因。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2008 Jun;58(6):735-86. doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.58.6.735.
9
Mitigation of Fully Fluorinated Greenhouse Gas Emissions in China and Implications for Climate Change Mitigation.中国全氟化温室气体排放的缓解及其对气候变化缓解的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Dec 5;57(48):19487-19496. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c02734. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
10
When could global warming reach 4°C?全球变暖何时会达到 4°C?
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2011 Jan 13;369(1934):67-84. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0292.