• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝叶斯非参数模型和经典测试理论方法得分的比较。

The comparison of the scores obtained by Bayesian nonparametric model and classical test theory methods.

机构信息

Division of Measurement and Evaluation in Education, Department of Educational Sciences, Inönü University, Malatya, Turkey.

Division of Measurement and Evaluation in Education, Department of Educational Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Sci Prog. 2021 Jul-Sep;104(3):368504211028371. doi: 10.1177/00368504211028371.

DOI:10.1177/00368504211028371
PMID:34236901
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10450720/
Abstract

Bayesian Nonparametric (BNP) modelling can be used to obtain more detailed information in test equating studies and to increase the accuracy of equating by accounting for covariates. In this study, two covariates are included in the equating under the Bayes nonparametric model, one is continuous, and the other is discrete. Scores equated with this model were obtained for a single group design for a small group in the study. The equated scores obtained with the model were compared with the mean and linear equating methods in the Classical Test Theory. Considering the equated scores obtained from three different methods, it was found that the equated scores obtained with the BNP model produced a distribution closer to the target test. Even the classical methods will give a good result with the smallest error when using a small sample, making equating studies valuable. The inclusion of the covariates in the model in the classical test equating process is based on some assumptions and cannot be achieved especially using small groups. The BNP model will be more beneficial than using frequentist methods, regardless of this limitation. Information about booklets and variables can be obtained from the distributors and equated scores that obtained with the BNP model. In this case, it makes it possible to compare sub-categories. This can be expressed as indicating the presence of differential item functioning (DIF). Therefore, the BNP model can be used actively in test equating studies, and it provides an opportunity to examine the characteristics of the individual participants at the same time. Thus, it allows test equating even in a small sample and offers the opportunity to reach a value closer to the scores in the target test.

摘要

贝叶斯非参数(BNP)建模可用于在测试等效研究中获得更详细的信息,并通过考虑协变量来提高等效的准确性。在这项研究中,贝叶斯非参数模型中包含了两个协变量,一个是连续的,另一个是离散的。该模型为研究中的一个小组设计的单个组获得了等效分数。与经典测试理论中的均值和线性等效方法相比,该模型获得的等效分数。考虑到三种不同方法获得的等效分数,发现与目标测试相比,BNP 模型获得的等效分数产生的分布更接近。即使使用小样本,经典方法也会以最小的误差给出很好的结果,因此等效研究是有价值的。在经典测试等效过程中,协变量包含在模型中是基于一些假设的,特别是使用小样本时无法实现。无论存在这种局限性,BNP 模型都将比使用频率论方法更有益。有关测验和变量的信息可以从分销商处获得,并且可以使用 BNP 模型获得等效分数。在这种情况下,可以进行子类别比较。这可以表示为存在差异项目功能(DIF)。因此,BNP 模型可以在测试等效研究中积极使用,同时为检查个体参与者的特征提供机会。因此,即使在小样本中也可以进行测试等效,并提供更接近目标测试分数的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b119/10450720/f31a2e88148e/10.1177_00368504211028371-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b119/10450720/10ff8be275ce/10.1177_00368504211028371-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b119/10450720/0dad5bf66701/10.1177_00368504211028371-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b119/10450720/a0d41fe7e295/10.1177_00368504211028371-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b119/10450720/1f9fdf956f57/10.1177_00368504211028371-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b119/10450720/f31a2e88148e/10.1177_00368504211028371-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b119/10450720/10ff8be275ce/10.1177_00368504211028371-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b119/10450720/0dad5bf66701/10.1177_00368504211028371-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b119/10450720/a0d41fe7e295/10.1177_00368504211028371-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b119/10450720/1f9fdf956f57/10.1177_00368504211028371-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b119/10450720/f31a2e88148e/10.1177_00368504211028371-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
The comparison of the scores obtained by Bayesian nonparametric model and classical test theory methods.贝叶斯非参数模型和经典测试理论方法得分的比较。
Sci Prog. 2021 Jul-Sep;104(3):368504211028371. doi: 10.1177/00368504211028371.
2
Kernel Equating Under the Non-Equivalent Groups With Covariates Design.具有协变量设计的非等组下的核等值法
Appl Psychol Meas. 2015 Jul;39(5):349-361. doi: 10.1177/0146621614567939. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
3
Test equating sleep scales: applying the Leunbach's model.测试睡眠量表等价性:应用 Leunbach 模型。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jul 8;19(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0768-y.
4
Comparisons of item difficulty and passing scores by test equating in a basic medical education curriculum.基础医学教育课程中通过测验等值进行的项目难度和及格分数比较。
Korean J Med Educ. 2019 Jun;31(2):147-157. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2019.126. Epub 2019 May 30.
5
[Equating scores using bridging stations on the clinical performance examination].[在临床技能考试中使用衔接站进行分数等值换算]
Korean J Med Educ. 2013 Jun;25(2):131-7. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2013.25.2.131. Epub 2013 Jun 30.
6
How Important is the Choice of Bandwidth in Kernel Equating?核等值中带宽的选择有多重要?
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 Oct;45(7-8):518-535. doi: 10.1177/01466216211040486. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
7
Standard Errors of Kernel Equating: Accounting for Bandwidth Estimation.核等值的标准误差:带宽估计的考量
Appl Psychol Meas. 2022 May;46(3):200-218. doi: 10.1177/01466216211066601. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
8
Test equating: what, why, how?
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1998 Mar;69(1):11-23. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1998.10607662.
9
Harmonizing the CBCL and SDQ ADHD scores by using linear equating, kernel equating, item response theory and machine learning methods.通过使用线性等值、核等值、项目反应理论和机器学习方法使儿童行为检查表(CBCL)和优势与困难问卷(SDQ)中多动症得分相协调。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 10;15:1345406. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1345406. eCollection 2024.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a new 17-item Asthenopia Survey Questionnaire using Rasch analysis.使用拉施分析开发一份新的包含17个条目的视疲劳调查问卷。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov 18;16(11):1867-1875. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.11.20. eCollection 2023.
2
Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 (YFAS 2.0) and modified YFAS 2.0 (mYFAS 2.0): Rasch analysis and differential item functioning.耶鲁食物成瘾量表2.0(YFAS 2.0)与改良耶鲁食物成瘾量表2.0(mYFAS 2.0):拉施分析与项目功能差异
J Eat Disord. 2022 Nov 28;10(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s40337-022-00708-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory in Individual Change Assessment.个体变化评估中经典测验理论与项目反应理论的比较
Appl Psychol Meas. 2016 Nov;40(8):559-572. doi: 10.1177/0146621616664046. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
2
Kernel Equating Under the Non-Equivalent Groups With Covariates Design.具有协变量设计的非等组下的核等值法
Appl Psychol Meas. 2015 Jul;39(5):349-361. doi: 10.1177/0146621614567939. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
3
Bayesian data analysis.贝叶斯数据分析。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2010 Sep;1(5):658-676. doi: 10.1002/wcs.72. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
4
A gentle introduction to bayesian analysis: applications to developmental research.贝叶斯分析简介:在发展研究中的应用
Child Dev. 2014 May-Jun;85(3):842-860. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12169. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
5
Bayesian estimation supersedes the t test.贝叶斯估计取代了 t 检验。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 May;142(2):573-603. doi: 10.1037/a0029146. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
6
Item response theory and the measurement of clinical change.项目反应理论与临床变化的测量
J Pers Assess. 2005 Jun;84(3):228-38. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_02.