Suppr超能文献

未能在大鼠中发现利他性食物分享行为。

Failure to Find Altruistic Food Sharing in Rats.

作者信息

Wan Haoran, Kirkman Cyrus, Jensen Greg, Hackenberg Timothy D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Reed College, Portland, OR, United States.

Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 22;12:696025. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.696025. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Prior research has found that one rat will release a second rat from a restraint in the presence of food, thereby allowing that second rat access to food. Such behavior, clearly beneficial to the second rat and costly to the first, has been interpreted as altruistic. Because clear demonstrations of altruism in rats are rare, such findings deserve a careful look. The present study aimed to replicate this finding, but with more systematic methods to examine whether, and under what conditions, a rat might share food with its cagemate partner. Rats were given repeated choices between high-valued food (sucrose pellets) and 30-s social access to a familiar rat, with the (a) food size (number of food pellets per response), and (b) food motivation (extra-session access to food) varied across conditions. Rats responded consistently for both food and social interaction, but at different levels and with different sensitivity to the food-access manipulations. Food production and consumption was high when food motivation was also high (food restriction) but substantially lower when food motivation was low (unlimited food access). Social release occurred at moderate levels, unaffected by the food-based manipulations. When food was abundant and food motivation low, the rats chose food and social options about equally often, but sharing (food left unconsumed prior to social release) occurred at low levels across sessions and conditions. Even under conditions of low food motivation, sharing occurred on only 1% of the sharing opportunities. The results are therefore inconsistent with claims in the literature that rats are altruistically motivated to share food with other rats.

摘要

先前的研究发现,在有食物的情况下,一只大鼠会松开对另一只大鼠的束缚,从而使第二只大鼠能够获取食物。这种行为显然对第二只大鼠有益,而对第一只大鼠有代价,被解释为利他行为。由于大鼠利他行为的明确例证很少,这样的发现值得仔细研究。本研究旨在重复这一发现,但采用更系统的方法来检验大鼠是否以及在何种条件下会与同笼伙伴分享食物。给大鼠在高价值食物(蔗糖颗粒)和与熟悉的大鼠进行30秒社交接触之间反复进行选择,其中(a)食物量(每次反应的食物颗粒数量)和(b)食物动机(额外时段获取食物)在不同条件下有所变化。大鼠对食物和社交互动的反应都很一致,但程度不同,对食物获取操作的敏感度也不同。当食物动机也很高(食物受限)时,食物的产出和消耗很高,但当食物动机很低(食物不受限)时则大幅降低。社交释放发生的程度适中,不受基于食物的操作影响。当食物充足且食物动机低时,大鼠选择食物和社交选项的频率大致相同,但在各时段和条件下分享(社交释放前未消耗的食物)发生的水平较低。即使在食物动机低的条件下,分享也仅在1%的分享机会中出现。因此,结果与文献中关于大鼠出于利他动机与其他大鼠分享食物的说法不一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ee0/8259949/a2794b9cec27/fpsyg-12-696025-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验