School of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, England
Centre for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, 38068 Trento, Italy.
J Neurosci. 2021 Aug 18;41(33):7120-7135. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0553-21.2021. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
Our visual environment is complicated, and our cognitive capacity is limited. As a result, we must strategically ignore some stimuli to prioritize others. Common sense suggests that foreknowledge of distractor characteristics, like location or color, might help us ignore these objects. But empirical studies have provided mixed evidence, often showing that knowing about a distractor before it appears counterintuitively leads to its attentional selection. What has looked like strategic distractor suppression in the past is now commonly explained as a product of prior experience and implicit statistical learning, and the long-standing notion the distractor suppression is reflected in α band oscillatory brain activity has been challenged by results appearing to link α to target resolution. Can we strategically, proactively suppress distractors? And, if so, does this involve α? Here, we use the concurrent recording of human EEG and eye movements in optimized experimental designs to identify behavior and brain activity associated with proactive distractor suppression. Results from three experiments show that knowing about distractors before they appear causes a reduction in electrophysiological indices of covert attentional selection of these objects and a reduction in the overt deployment of the eyes to the location of the objects. This control is established before the distractor appears and is predicted by the power of cue-elicited α activity over the visual cortex. Foreknowledge of distractor characteristics therefore leads to improved selective control, and α oscillations in visual cortex reflect the implementation of this strategic, proactive mechanism. To behave adaptively and achieve goals we often need to ignore visual distraction. Is it easier to ignore distracting objects when we know more about them? We recorded eye movements and electrical brain activity to determine whether foreknowledge of distractor characteristics can be used to limit processing of these objects. Results show that knowing the location or color of a distractor stops us from attentionally selecting it. A neural signature of this inhibition emerges in oscillatory alpha band brain activity, and when this signal is strong, selective processing of the distractor decreases. Knowing about the characteristics of task-irrelevant distractors therefore increases our ability to focus on task-relevant information, in this way gating information processing in the brain.
我们的视觉环境复杂,认知能力有限。因此,我们必须有策略地忽略一些刺激,以优先处理其他刺激。常识表明,对分心物特征(如位置或颜色)的先验知识可能有助于我们忽略这些物体。但实证研究提供了混合的证据,通常表明,在分心物出现之前就知道它会反直觉地导致其被注意选择。过去看起来是策略性的分心物抑制,现在通常被解释为先前经验和内隐统计学习的产物,而长期以来的观点认为,分心物抑制反映在α 波段振荡脑活动中,这一观点受到了与α 相关的结果的挑战,这些结果似乎与目标分辨率有关。我们能否有策略地、主动地抑制分心物?如果可以,这是否涉及到α?在这里,我们使用人类脑电图和眼动的同步记录,在优化的实验设计中识别与主动分心物抑制相关的行为和大脑活动。三个实验的结果表明,在分心物出现之前就知道它们会导致这些物体的隐蔽注意选择的电生理指标减少,并且眼睛对物体位置的显式部署减少。这种控制是在分心物出现之前建立的,并且可以通过提示引发的α 活动对视觉皮层的功率来预测。因此,对分心物特征的先验知识导致了选择性控制的改善,并且视觉皮层中的α 振荡反映了这种策略性的、主动的机制的实施。为了适应环境并实现目标,我们经常需要忽略视觉干扰。当我们对分心物有更多了解时,忽略它们是否更容易?我们记录了眼动和大脑电活动,以确定对分心物特征的先验知识是否可用于限制对这些物体的处理。结果表明,知道分心物的位置或颜色可以阻止我们对其进行注意选择。这种抑制的神经特征出现在振荡的α 波段脑活动中,当这个信号较强时,对分心物的选择性处理就会减少。因此,对任务无关分心物特征的了解提高了我们专注于任务相关信息的能力,从而在大脑中对信息处理进行了门控。