• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion With Decortication: The EVoluSIon Clinical Study.微创去皮质骶髂关节融合术后的临床结果:EVoluSIon临床研究
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Feb;16(1):168-175. doi: 10.14444/8185. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
2
Pain and Opioid use Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion with Decortication and Bone Grafting: The Evolusion Clinical Trial.微创去皮质和植骨骶髂关节融合术后的疼痛与阿片类药物使用结果:Evolusion临床试验
Open Orthop J. 2017 Dec 27;11:1440-1448. doi: 10.2174/1874325001711011440. eCollection 2017.
3
Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.微创骶髂关节融合术与非手术治疗骶髂关节功能障碍的随机对照试验的两年结果
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Aug 23;10:28. doi: 10.14444/3028. eCollection 2016.
4
Patient-Reported and Radiographic Outcomes After Revision Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.翻修性骶髂关节融合术后患者报告的结局和影像学结果。
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):250-257. doi: 10.14444/8421. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
5
Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review.微创骶髂关节融合术治疗慢性骶髂关节痛:系统评价。
Spine J. 2022 Aug;22(8):1240-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
6
1-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Conservative Management vs. Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain.保守治疗与微创外科治疗骶髂关节疼痛的随机对照试验 1 年结果。
Pain Physician. 2017 Sep;20(6):537-550.
7
Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study.微创骶髂关节融合术的安全性及6个月疗效:一项前瞻性研究。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2013 Dec 13;6:219-29. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S55197. eCollection 2013.
8
Effects of BMI on SI joint fusion outcomes: examining the evidence to improve insurance guidelines.BMI 对骶髂关节融合结果的影响:研究证据以改善保险指南。
Spine J. 2024 May;24(5):783-790. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.11.015. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
9
Is the Oswestry Disability Index a valid measure of response to sacroiliac joint treatment?奥斯维斯特里功能障碍指数是衡量骶髂关节治疗反应的有效指标吗?
Qual Life Res. 2016 Feb;25(2):283-292. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1095-3. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
10
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: One Year Clinical and Radiographic Results Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Surgery.骶髂关节融合术:微创骶髂关节融合手术后一年的临床及影像学结果
Open Orthop J. 2016 Nov 30;10:679-689. doi: 10.2174/1874325001610010679. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive lateral, posterior, and posterolateral sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创外侧、后侧及后外侧骶髂关节融合术治疗腰痛:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Int Med Res. 2025 Feb;53(2):3000605251315300. doi: 10.1177/03000605251315300.
2
Utility of minimally invasive percutaneous arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint for the treatment of low back pain: systematic review of the literature.微创经皮骶髂关节融合术治疗腰痛的效用:文献系统评价
Eur Spine J. 2025 Mar;34(3):974-1003. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08629-4. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
3
Advancements in sacroiliac joint reduction for enhancing lumbosacral pain relief and achieving balanced gait: A literature review.骶髂关节复位在缓解腰骶部疼痛及实现步态平衡方面的进展:一项文献综述。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 13;103(50):e40350. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040350.
4
Sacroiliac joint dysfunction: anatomy, pathophysiology, differential diagnosis, and treatment approaches.骶髂关节功能障碍:解剖学、病理生理学、鉴别诊断及治疗方法
Skeletal Radiol. 2025 Jun;54(6):1195-1213. doi: 10.1007/s00256-024-04831-z. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
5
American Society of Pain and Neuroscience Best Practice (ASPN) Guideline for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Disorders.美国疼痛与神经科学学会骶髂关节疾病治疗最佳实践(ASPN)指南
J Pain Res. 2024 May 3;17:1601-1638. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S464393. eCollection 2024.
6
Minimally Invasive SI Joint Fusion Procedures for Chronic SI Joint Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety and Efficacy.慢性骶髂关节疼痛的微创骶髂关节融合手术:安全性和有效性的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Dec 26;17(6):794-808. doi: 10.14444/8543.
7
Patient-Reported and Radiographic Outcomes After Revision Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.翻修性骶髂关节融合术后患者报告的结局和影像学结果。
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):250-257. doi: 10.14444/8421. Epub 2023 Feb 8.

本文引用的文献

1
The Safety Profile of Percutaneous Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.经皮微创骶髂关节融合术的安全性概况
Global Spine J. 2019 Dec;9(8):874-880. doi: 10.1177/2192568218816981. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
2
Biomechanical evaluation of sacroiliac joint fixation with decortication.骶髂关节固定的生物力学评估。
Spine J. 2018 Jul;18(7):1241-1249. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
3
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes with a Principles-Based SIJ Fusion System.微创骶髂关节融合术:使用基于原则的骶髂关节融合系统的2年影像学和临床结果
Open Orthop J. 2018 Jan 17;12:7-16. doi: 10.2174/1874325001812010007. eCollection 2018.
4
Pain and Opioid use Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion with Decortication and Bone Grafting: The Evolusion Clinical Trial.微创去皮质和植骨骶髂关节融合术后的疼痛与阿片类药物使用结果:Evolusion临床试验
Open Orthop J. 2017 Dec 27;11:1440-1448. doi: 10.2174/1874325001711011440. eCollection 2017.
5
The Assessment of Fusion Following Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Surgery.骶髂关节融合手术后融合情况的评估
Cureus. 2017 Oct 20;9(10):e1787. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1787.
6
1-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Conservative Management vs. Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain.保守治疗与微创外科治疗骶髂关节疼痛的随机对照试验 1 年结果。
Pain Physician. 2017 Sep;20(6):537-550.
7
Revision of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fixation: Technical Considerations and Case Studies Using Decortication and Threaded Implant Fixation.微创骶髂关节固定术的修订:使用去皮质和螺纹植入物固定的技术考量与病例研究
Int J Spine Surg. 2017 Feb 27;11(1):8. doi: 10.14444/4008. eCollection 2017.
8
Predictors of Outcome in Conservative and Minimally Invasive Surgical Management of Pain Originating From the Sacroiliac Joint: A Pooled Analysis.源自骶髂关节的疼痛的保守和微创外科治疗结局的预测因素:汇总分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Nov 1;42(21):1664-1673. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002169.
9
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: One Year Clinical and Radiographic Results Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Surgery.骶髂关节融合术:微创骶髂关节融合手术后一年的临床及影像学结果
Open Orthop J. 2016 Nov 30;10:679-689. doi: 10.2174/1874325001610010679. eCollection 2016.
10
Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.微创骶髂关节融合术与非手术治疗骶髂关节功能障碍的随机对照试验的两年结果
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Aug 23;10:28. doi: 10.14444/3028. eCollection 2016.

微创去皮质骶髂关节融合术后的临床结果:EVoluSIon临床研究

Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion With Decortication: The EVoluSIon Clinical Study.

作者信息

Kucharzyk Donald, Colle Kyle, Boone Christopher, Araghi Ali

机构信息

DK Orthopedics, Crown Point, IN, USA.

Regional Brain and Spine, Cape Girardeau, MO, USA.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Feb;16(1):168-175. doi: 10.14444/8185. Epub 2022 Feb 25.

DOI:10.14444/8185
PMID:35217586
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9519080/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This report documents 1-year results of 250 patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter study of a minimally invasive (MI) sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) system that uses decortication, graft placement, and joint fixation.

METHODS

The cohort includes all patients enrolled in the EVoluSIon (EVSI) clinical study who had MI SIJF surgery and completed 1-year follow-up. Average age at baseline was 60.5 years, and 70.8% were female. Sacroiliac (SI) joint-related pain duration was ≥2 years in 56% of patients. Visual analog scale (VAS) SI joint pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), quality of life, and opioid use were assessed preoperatively and at 1 year.

RESULTS

At 1 year, the mean VAS pain demonstrated a significant reduction of more than 43 points, from 76.4 at baseline to 33.0 ( < 0.0001), with 72.2% of patients attaining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID, ≥20-point improvement). Mean ODI scores also significantly improved from 54.4 at baseline to 30.5 at 1 year ( < 0.0001), with 62.5% of patients achieving the MCID (≥15-point improvement). Prior to surgery, 62.7% (126/201) of patients were taking opioids or other narcotics, but by 1 year postsurgery, only 26.9% (54/201) of patients reported using these medications, representing a significant 57.1% decrease in narcotic/opioid use ( < 0.0001). Fusion of the SI joint was seen in 68.7% of patients. Few procedural complications were reported. In all, there were 8 (8/250) serious procedure-related events, including 1 device malposition observed on the day of surgery that required replacing the superior screw with a shorter screw.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of patients treated with MI SIJF in the EVSI study demonstrated that the procedure can be performed safely and results in significant improvements in pain, quality of life, and opioid use at 1 year as well as causing fusion in the majority of patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

MI SIJF differs from most procedures currently being performed in that it applies true orthopedic principles with decorticating, bone grafting, fusion, and placement of implants perpendicular to the joint for greatest stability. The 12-month data show improvement in functionality, reduction in pain, and, most notably, a reduction in narcotic usage, which is important considering the ongoing opioid epidemic.

摘要

背景

本报告记录了250例患者参与一项前瞻性、多中心研究的1年结果,该研究针对一种采用去皮质、植骨和关节固定的微创(MI)骶髂关节融合(SIJF)系统。

方法

该队列包括所有参与EVoluSIon(EVSI)临床研究且接受了MI SIJF手术并完成1年随访的患者。基线时的平均年龄为60.5岁,70.8%为女性。56%的患者骶髂(SI)关节相关疼痛持续时间≥2年。术前及1年时评估视觉模拟量表(VAS)SI关节疼痛、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、生活质量和阿片类药物使用情况。

结果

在1年时,平均VAS疼痛显著降低超过43分,从基线时的76.4降至33.0(<0.0001),72.2%的患者达到最小临床重要差异(MCID,改善≥20分)。平均ODI评分也从基线时的54.4显著改善至1年时的30.5(<0.0001),62.5%的患者达到MCID(改善≥15分)。手术前,62.7%(126/201)的患者正在服用阿片类药物或其他麻醉剂,但术后1年时,只有26.9%(54/201)的患者报告使用这些药物,麻醉剂/阿片类药物使用显著减少57.1%(<0.0001)。68.7%的患者出现SI关节融合。报告的手术并发症很少。总共发生了8起(8/250)与手术相关的严重事件,包括1例在手术当天观察到的器械位置不当,需要用较短的螺钉更换上位螺钉。

结论

对EVSI研究中接受MI SIJF治疗的患者进行分析表明,该手术可以安全进行,并且在1年时能显著改善疼痛、生活质量和阿片类药物使用情况,同时使大多数患者实现融合。

临床意义

MI SIJF与目前正在进行的大多数手术不同,它应用了真正的骨科原则,包括去皮质、植骨、融合以及将植入物垂直于关节放置以实现最大稳定性。12个月的数据显示功能有所改善、疼痛减轻,最显著的是麻醉剂使用减少,考虑到持续的阿片类药物流行,这一点很重要。