Sun Jiayao, Kong Lin, Chen Zhi, You Dan, Mao Jingfang, Guan Xiyin, Wu Xiaodong, Sheng Yinxiangzi
Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China.
Front Oncol. 2021 Jun 23;11:694749. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.694749. eCollection 2021.
To verify the practicality and safety of a treatment chair with six degrees of freedom (6DTC) through demonstrating the efficacy of the workflow in clinical settings and analyzing the obtained technical data, including intra-fraction patient movement during the use of the 6DTC.
A clinical study was designed and conducted to test the clinical treatment workflow and the safety of the 6DTC. Based on the demonstrated dosimetric advantages, fifteen patients with head and neck tumors were selected and treated with the 6DTC. The positional error at the first beam position (PE-B1) and the second beam position (PE-B2) were analyzed and compared with the results from daily quality assurance (QA) procedures of the 6DTC and imaging system performed each day before clinical treatment. The intra-fraction patient movement was derived from the total patient alignment positional error and the QA data based on a Gaussian distribution formulism.
The QA results showed sub-millimeter mechanical accuracy of the 6DTC over the course of the clinical study. For 150 patient treatment fractions, the mean deviations between PE-B1 and PE-B2 were 0.13mm (SD 0.88mm), 0.25mm (SD 1.17mm), -0.57mm (SD 0.85mm), 0.02° (SD 0.35°), 0.00° (SD 0.37°), and -0.02° (SD 0.37°) in the x, y, z (translational), and u, v, w (rotational) directions, respectively. The calculated intra-fraction patient movement was -0.08mm (SD 0.56mm), 0.71mm (SD 1.12mm), -0.52mm (SD 0.84mm), 0.10° (SD 0.32°), 0.09° (SD 0.36°), and -0.04° (SD 0.36°) in the x, y, z, u, v, w directions, respectively.
The performance stability of the 6DTC was satisfactory. The position accuracy and intra-fraction patient movement in an upright posture with the 6DTC were verified and found adequate for clinical implementation.
通过展示临床环境中工作流程的有效性并分析所获得的技术数据,包括使用六自由度治疗椅(6DTC)期间分次治疗过程中患者的移动情况,来验证六自由度治疗椅的实用性和安全性。
设计并开展了一项临床研究,以测试6DTC的临床治疗工作流程和安全性。基于已证明的剂量学优势,选择了15名头颈部肿瘤患者并使用6DTC进行治疗。分析了第一束光位置(PE-B1)和第二束光位置(PE-B2)的位置误差,并与临床治疗前每天进行的6DTC和成像系统的日常质量保证(QA)程序结果进行比较。分次治疗过程中患者的移动是根据总患者对准位置误差和基于高斯分布公式的QA数据得出的。
QA结果显示,在临床研究过程中6DTC的机械精度达到亚毫米级。对于150次患者治疗分次,PE-B1和PE-B2之间在x、y、z(平移)方向以及u、v、w(旋转)方向的平均偏差分别为0.13毫米(标准差0.88毫米)、0.25毫米(标准差1.17毫米)、-0.57毫米(标准差0.85毫米)、0.02°(标准差0.35°)、0.00°(标准差0.37°)和-0.02°(标准差0.37°)。计算得出的分次治疗过程中患者在x、y、z、u、v、w方向的移动分别为-0.08毫米(标准差0.56毫米)、0.71毫米(标准差1.12毫米)、-0.52毫米(标准差0.84毫米)、0.10°(标准差0.32°)、0.09°(标准差0.36°)和-0.04°(标准差0.36°)。
6DTC的性能稳定性令人满意。验证了6DTC在直立姿势下的位置精度和分次治疗过程中患者的移动情况,发现其足以用于临床应用。