• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
"": trajectories, experiences and user's perceptions about quality of abortion care in a telehealth service in Chile.“”:轨迹、经验和用户对智利远程医疗服务中堕胎护理质量的看法。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021;29(3):1948953. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2021.1948953.
2
Abortion beyond 13 weeks in Argentina: healthcare seeking experiences during self-managed abortion accompanied by the Socorristas en Red.阿根廷 13 周以上的堕胎:由 Red 援助者陪伴的自我管理堕胎期间的医疗保健寻求经历。
Reprod Health. 2022 Aug 26;19(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01488-6.
3
Women's experiences of a telemedicine abortion service (up to 12 weeks) implemented during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: a qualitative evaluation.在冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行期间实施的(最多 12 周)远程医疗堕胎服务中妇女的体验:定性评估。
BJOG. 2021 Oct;128(11):1752-1761. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16813. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
4
"I'll just deal with this on my own": a qualitative exploration of experiences with self-managed abortion in the United States.“我将独自处理这件事”:对美国自主堕胎经历的定性探索。
Reprod Health. 2021 May 4;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01142-7.
5
The difficult process of autonomous choice: using I-poems to understand experiences of abortion-seekers in The Netherlands.自主选择的艰难过程:使用 I-poems 理解荷兰堕胎寻求者的经历。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2215963. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2215963.
6
Safe abortion information hotlines: An effective strategy for increasing women's access to safe abortions in Latin America.安全堕胎信息热线:拉丁美洲增加妇女获得安全堕胎服务机会的有效策略。
Reprod Health Matters. 2015 May;23(45):47-57. doi: 10.1016/j.rhm.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
7
Women's abortion seeking behavior under restrictive abortion laws in Mexico.墨西哥限制堕胎法下的妇女堕胎寻求行为。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 27;14(12):e0226522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226522. eCollection 2019.
8
Effectiveness of self-managed medication abortion between 13 and 24 weeks gestation: A retrospective review of case records from accompaniment groups in Argentina, Chile, and Ecuador.13 至 24 孕周自主药物流产的有效性:来自阿根廷、智利和厄瓜多尔陪伴组病例记录的回顾性研究。
Contraception. 2020 Aug;102(2):91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.04.015. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
9
Person-centred care for abortion services in private facilities to improve women's experiences in Kenya.肯尼亚私营医疗机构提供以人为本的堕胎服务,以改善女性的就诊体验。
Cult Health Sex. 2021 Feb;23(2):224-239. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2019.1701083. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
10
"They talked to me rudely". Women perspectives on quality of post-abortion care in public health facilities in Kenya.“他们粗鲁地跟我说话”。肯尼亚公立卫生机构人工流产后护理质量的女性观点。
Reprod Health. 2023 Feb 27;20(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01580-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Adolescent abortion care trajectories and safety in Ethiopia, Malawi, and Zambia: A comparative mixed methods study.埃塞俄比亚、马拉维和赞比亚青少年堕胎护理轨迹与安全性:一项比较性混合方法研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 May 6;5(5):e0004469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004469. eCollection 2025.
2
Determinants of Access to Sexual and Reproductive Health for Adolescent Girls in Vulnerable Situations in Latin America.拉丁美洲处境脆弱的少女获得性与生殖健康服务的决定因素
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Feb 10;22(2):248. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020248.
3
Seeking abortion medications online: experiences from a mystery client study in Colombia.在网上寻找堕胎药物:哥伦比亚一项神秘客户研究的经验
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e086404. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086404.
4
Failure of the Law to Grant Access to Legal Abortion in Chile.智利法律未能允许合法堕胎。
Health Equity. 2024 Mar 20;8(1):189-197. doi: 10.1089/heq.2023.0050. eCollection 2024.
5
Self-managed abortion via the internet: Analysis of one year of service delivery data from Women Help Women.通过互联网进行的自我管理堕胎:对“女性帮助女性”组织一年服务提供数据的分析。
Gates Open Res. 2023 Feb 13;7:41. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.14369.1. eCollection 2023.
6
Centring rights-based access to self-care interventions.以权利为中心获取自我护理干预措施。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021;29(3):2138053. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2138053.
7
Abortion decision-making process trajectories and determinants in low- and middle-income countries: A mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis.低收入和中等收入国家的堕胎决策过程轨迹及决定因素:一项混合方法的系统评价和荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Oct 17;54:101694. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101694. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
How, when and where? A systematic review on abortion decision making in legally restricted settings in sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, and the Caribbean.在法律限制堕胎的撒哈拉以南非洲、拉丁美洲和加勒比地区,何时、何地以及如何做出堕胎决定?一项关于这一问题的系统综述。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Oct 10;22(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01962-0.
9
In-person later abortion accompaniment: a feminist collective-facilitated self-care practice in Latin America.现场晚期堕胎陪伴:拉丁美洲的女权主义集体促进的自我保健实践。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021;29(3):2009103. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2021.2009103.

本文引用的文献

1
Autonomous Health Movements: Criminalization, De-Medicalization, and Community-Based Direct Action.自主健康运动:刑事定罪、非医学化与基于社区的直接行动
Health Hum Rights. 2020 Dec;22(2):85-97.
2
Women's experiences with information before medication abortion at home, support during the process and follow-up procedures - A qualitative study.在家进行药物流产前女性获取信息的经历、过程中的支持及后续程序——一项定性研究
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2021 Feb;27:100582. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100582. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
3
"It's not a seven-headed beast": abortion experience among women that received support from helplines for medication abortion in restrictive settings.“这不是七头怪兽”:在限制堕胎的环境中,接受药物流产援助热线支持的女性的堕胎经历。
Health Care Women Int. 2020 Oct;41(10):1128-1146. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2020.1823981. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
4
Why self-managed abortion is so much more than a provisional solution for times of pandemic.为何自我管理的堕胎远不只是疫情期间的临时解决方案。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(1):1779633. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1779633.
5
Effectiveness of self-managed medication abortion between 13 and 24 weeks gestation: A retrospective review of case records from accompaniment groups in Argentina, Chile, and Ecuador.13 至 24 孕周自主药物流产的有效性:来自阿根廷、智利和厄瓜多尔陪伴组病例记录的回顾性研究。
Contraception. 2020 Aug;102(2):91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.04.015. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
6
Medical and midwifery student attitudes toward moral acceptability and legality of abortion, following decriminalization of abortion in Chile.智利堕胎合法化后,医学生和助产学学生对堕胎的道德可接受性和合法性的态度。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2020 Jun;24:100502. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100502. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
7
Induced Abortion According to Socioeconomic Status in Chile.智利按社会经济地位划分的人工流产情况
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2020 Aug;33(4):415-420.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.03.003. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
8
Self-administered versus provider-administered medical abortion.自我给药与医护人员给药的药物流产
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 9;3(3):CD013181. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013181.pub2.
9
Online access to abortion medications: a review of utilization and clinical outcomes.在线获取堕胎药:利用和临床结局的综述。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Feb;63:74-86. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
10
Pain and pain management during induced abortions: A web-based exploratory study of recollections from previous patients.人工流产期间的疼痛与疼痛管理:一项基于网络的对既往患者回忆的探索性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Nov;75(11):3006-3017. doi: 10.1111/jan.14132. Epub 2019 Jul 30.

“”:轨迹、经验和用户对智利远程医疗服务中堕胎护理质量的看法。

"": trajectories, experiences and user's perceptions about quality of abortion care in a telehealth service in Chile.

机构信息

Doctoral candidate, Departament de Ciències Experimentals i de la Salut, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain; Research Coordinator, Women Help Women, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Associate Academic, Departamento Promoción de la Salud de la Mujer y el Recién Nacido, Facultad de Medicina Norte, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Evaluator, Inclusión y Equidad, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021;29(3):1948953. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2021.1948953.

DOI:10.1080/26410397.2021.1948953
PMID:34252017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8276659/
Abstract

Self-managed abortion is a common self-care practice that enables pregnant people to exercise their rights to health, bodily autonomy and to benefit from the advances of science even when living in contexts that do not guarantee these rights. In this interpretative qualitative study, we aimed to understand women's abortion trajectories, experiences with self-managed abortion and assessments of the quality of care provided by Women Help Women (WHW, an international activist non-profit organisation working on abortion access). Grounded in feminist epistemology and health inequalities approaches, we conducted eleven semi-structured interviews in Santiago, Chile. We found that illegality, stigma and expectations surrounding motherhood and abortion determined women's experiences. Participants perceived the WHW service as good, trustworthy, fast and affordable, and valued confidentiality and privacy; the quantity and quality of information; having direct, personalised and timely communication with service staff; being treated with respect; and feeling safe, cared for and supported in their decisions. Most participants considered self-managed abortion appropriate and acceptable given their circumstances. Fear was the dominant feeling in women's narratives. Some participants mentioned missing instant communication, in-person support and professional care. We conclude that support, information and company are key to improving abortion seekers' experiences and enabling their decisions, particularly in legally restrictive settings. Centring care in pregnant people's needs and autonomy is fundamental to ensure safe, appropriate and accessible self-care interventions in reproductive health. Social and legal changes, such as public funding for abortion, destigmatisation and decriminalisation, are needed to realise people's right to higher standards of healthcare.

摘要

自主堕胎是一种常见的自我保健实践,使孕妇能够行使自己的健康权、身体自主权,并从科学进步中受益,即使在不保障这些权利的环境中也是如此。在这项解释性定性研究中,我们旨在了解妇女的堕胎轨迹、自主堕胎的经验以及对妇女帮助妇女(WHW,一个致力于堕胎获取的国际激进非营利组织)提供的护理质量的评估。我们的研究扎根于女权主义认识论和健康不平等方法,在智利圣地亚哥进行了 11 次半结构化访谈。我们发现,非法性、耻辱感以及对母性和堕胎的期望决定了妇女的经验。参与者认为 WHW 服务质量好、值得信赖、快速且负担得起,并重视保密性和隐私;信息的数量和质量;与服务人员进行直接、个性化和及时的沟通;受到尊重;在决策中感到安全、受到关怀和支持。大多数参与者认为,鉴于她们的情况,自主堕胎是合适和可以接受的。恐惧是妇女叙述中的主导情绪。一些参与者提到缺少即时沟通、面对面支持和专业护理。我们的结论是,支持、信息和陪伴是改善堕胎寻求者体验和使她们能够做出决定的关键,特别是在法律限制的环境中。以孕妇的需求和自主权为中心是确保生殖健康中安全、适当和可及的自我保健干预的基础。需要进行社会和法律变革,如为堕胎提供公共资金、消除耻辱化和非刑罪化,以实现人们获得更高标准医疗保健的权利。