University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Social Work, Chapel Hill, NC.
Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR.
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Jul;17(7):e947-e957. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00276.
Literature on moral distress among oncology social workers (OSWs) is sparse. The aim of the current study was to examine the prevalence of moral distress and its domains of influence, and to identify demographic and work-related characteristics associated with moral distress among OSWs.
Data came from the Oncology Social Work Competencies, Opportunities, Roles, and Expertise survey, conducted from August to September 2020 (during the COVID-19 global pandemic). Data collected included demographic information (eg, age, sex, and race) and work-related characteristics (eg, job position, organization type, work setting, employment status, salary, years in the profession, and OSW-C certification). Moral distress was measured using the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals. Tests of association, including multivariate linear regression, were conducted to achieve the research aims.
Total moral distress scores on the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (range 0-432) for 745 OSWs ranged from 1 to 273, with an average score of 74.0. The three highest indicators of moral distress were observed in the patient or family experience domain. Higher levels of moral distress were associated with younger age, being a direct service provider, provision of inpatient cancer care, and more years in the profession.
OSWs are experiencing moral distress. Institutional investments in professional education and support of OSWs are needed to mitigate and possibly prevent moral distress experienced by cancer care providers and thus ensure the delivery of quality psychosocial care for patients with cancer and their families.
肿瘤社会工作者(OSW)道德困境方面的文献很少。本研究旨在考察 OSW 道德困境的普遍性及其影响领域,并确定与 OSW 道德困境相关的人口统计学和工作相关特征。
数据来自 2020 年 8 月至 9 月(COVID-19 全球大流行期间)进行的肿瘤社会工作能力、机会、角色和专业知识调查。收集的数据包括人口统计学信息(例如年龄、性别和种族)和工作相关特征(例如职位、组织类型、工作场所、雇佣状况、薪资、专业年限和 OSW-C 认证)。道德困境使用医疗保健专业人员道德困境衡量标准进行衡量。进行了关联测试,包括多元线性回归,以实现研究目的。
745 名 OSW 对医疗保健专业人员道德困境衡量标准(范围为 0-432)的总道德困境评分从 1 到 273 不等,平均得分为 74.0。道德困境的三个最高指标出现在患者或家庭体验领域。更高水平的道德困境与年龄较小、直接服务提供者、提供住院癌症护理以及更长的专业年限有关。
OSW 正在经历道德困境。需要对专业教育进行机构投资,并支持 OSW,以减轻并可能预防癌症护理提供者所经历的道德困境,从而确保为癌症患者及其家属提供优质的社会心理护理。