• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤社会工作干预指数(OSWii):一种衡量肿瘤社会工作干预以推进研究的工具。

Oncology social work intervention index (OSWii): An instrument to measure oncology social work interventions to advance research.

机构信息

University of Maryland School of Social Work, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

J Psychosoc Oncol. 2021;39(2):143-160. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2020.1857897. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

DOI:10.1080/07347332.2020.1857897
PMID:33481691
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8790712/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: There is much interest in screening for and treating psychosocial distress in cancer patients; however, little is known about if and how psychosocial services are provided for patients demonstrating significant levels of distress. Oncology social workers (OSWs) are the primary providers of psychosocial care for cancer patients and their families, yet there is no widely-used and empirically-validated instrument that captures the range of interventions provided by OSWs. The purpose of this paper is to describe the development of the Oncology Social Work Intervention Index (OSWii), designed to measure interventions provided by OSWs, and the results of testing the instrument.

METHODS

We conducted a content analysis of data collected by the Association of Oncology Social Work's Project to Assure Quality Cancer Care (APAQCC). We analyzed 3,194 responses from an open-ended question that described social work interventions following a distress screen. Five investigators coded the data in an iterative process to enhance instrument validity. The resulting instrument measuring OSWii was piloted with 38 oncology social workers across 156 individual cases.

RESULTS

OSWs who piloted the OSWii spent a majority of time (72%) engaging in clinical interventions. The user assessment revealed that data entry was rapid, the instrument was easy to use, and the content was relevant to the cancer treatment setting.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Using a standardized instrument that reflects OSWs' clinical interventions is critical for researchers to examine the impact of psychosocial interventions on patient outcomes. This index may also advance the translation of scientific findings into patient-centered psychosocial cancer care. This pilot test suggests that the OSWii is both scalable and useful.

摘要

背景/目的:人们对筛查和治疗癌症患者的心理困扰非常感兴趣;然而,对于表现出明显困扰水平的患者,心理社会服务是否以及如何提供,知之甚少。肿瘤社会工作者(OSW)是癌症患者及其家属心理社会护理的主要提供者,但没有广泛使用和经验验证的工具来捕捉 OSW 提供的干预措施范围。本文旨在描述开发肿瘤社会工作干预指数(OSWii)的目的,该指数旨在衡量 OSW 提供的干预措施,以及测试该工具的结果。

方法

我们对协会肿瘤社会工作的保证癌症护理质量项目(APAQCC)收集的数据进行了内容分析。我们分析了对社会工作干预措施进行的 3194 次开放式回答,这些干预措施是在进行困扰筛查后进行的。五位调查员在一个迭代过程中对数据进行编码,以增强工具的有效性。该工具测量 OSWii 在 156 个个体病例中的 38 名肿瘤社会工作者中进行了试点。

结果

试点 OSWii 的 OSW 花费了大部分时间(72%)进行临床干预。用户评估表明,数据输入速度快,仪器使用简单,内容与癌症治疗环境相关。

结论和意义

使用反映 OSW 临床干预的标准化工具对于研究人员研究心理社会干预对患者结果的影响至关重要。该指数还可以促进将科学发现转化为以患者为中心的癌症心理社会护理。该试点测试表明,OSWii 既具有可扩展性又有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa13/8790712/3873a276005c/nihms-1771700-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa13/8790712/5831da971798/nihms-1771700-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa13/8790712/8587b1bb5f78/nihms-1771700-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa13/8790712/7ecafc9f997e/nihms-1771700-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa13/8790712/f70ad2872d32/nihms-1771700-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa13/8790712/3873a276005c/nihms-1771700-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa13/8790712/5831da971798/nihms-1771700-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa13/8790712/8587b1bb5f78/nihms-1771700-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa13/8790712/7ecafc9f997e/nihms-1771700-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa13/8790712/f70ad2872d32/nihms-1771700-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa13/8790712/3873a276005c/nihms-1771700-f0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Oncology social work intervention index (OSWii): An instrument to measure oncology social work interventions to advance research.肿瘤社会工作干预指数(OSWii):一种衡量肿瘤社会工作干预以推进研究的工具。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2021;39(2):143-160. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2020.1857897. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
2
The Association of Oncology Social Work's Project to Assure Quality Cancer Care (APAQCC).肿瘤社会工作协会的保证癌症护理质量项目(APAQCC)。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2018 Jan-Feb;36(1):19-30. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2017.1397832. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
3
Screening for psychosocial distress: a national survey of oncology social workers.心理社会困扰筛查:一项针对肿瘤社会工作者的全国性调查。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2015;33(1):34-47. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2014.977416.
4
The essential and evolving nature of oncology social work: Accomplishments and impact, 2010-present.肿瘤学社会工作的本质和发展:2010 年至今的成就与影响。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2024;42(6):739-768. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2024.2404577. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
5
Did COVID-19 change the interventions provided by oncology social workers in the epicenter of the pandemic? A natural experiment.新冠疫情是否改变了肿瘤社会工作者在疫情中心提供的干预措施?一项自然实验。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2021;39(3):469-478. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2021.1884635. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
6
Moral Distress Among Oncology Social Workers.肿瘤社会工作者的道德困境
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Jul;17(7):e947-e957. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00276.
7
Addressing the needs of parents with advanced cancer: Attitudes, practice behaviors, and training experiences of oncology social workers.满足晚期癌症患者父母的需求:肿瘤社会工作者的态度、实践行为和培训经验。
Palliat Support Care. 2021 Jun;19(3):329-334. doi: 10.1017/S1478951520001005.
8
Next of kin's motives for psychosocial consultation-Oncology social workers' perceptions of 54 next of kin cases.亲属寻求心理社会咨询的动机——肿瘤社会工作者对 54 例亲属案例的看法。
Psychooncology. 2019 Jan;28(1):154-159. doi: 10.1002/pon.4925. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
9
The distress thermometer: a rapid and effective tool for the oncology social worker.痛苦温度计:肿瘤社会工作者的一种快速有效的工具。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2013;26(4):353-9. doi: 10.1108/09526861311319573.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing an instrument to measure the quality of social work cancer counseling regarding return to work - psychometric properties of the German Quality of Cancer Counseling Questionnaire-Return to Work (QCCQ-W).开发一种用于衡量社会工作癌症咨询中关于重返工作质量的工具——德国癌症咨询问卷-重返工作(QCCQ-W)的心理测量特性。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Dec 5;151(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-06040-6.
2
Delineation of core roles of oncology social workers in inpatient settings: a secondary data analysis.肿瘤社会工作者在住院环境中的核心角色界定:二次数据分析。
Soc Work Health Care. 2024;63(6-7):473-488. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2024.2400880. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
3

本文引用的文献

1
"Not just another meta-analysis": Sources of heterogeneity in psychosocial treatment effect on cancer survival.“不仅仅是另一个荟萃分析”:心理社会治疗对癌症生存效果的异质性来源。
Cancer Med. 2019 Jan;8(1):363-373. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1895. Epub 2019 Jan 1.
2
Best Practices in Oncology Distress Management: Beyond the Screen.肿瘤应激管理的最佳实践:超越屏幕。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018 May 23;38:813-821. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_201307.
3
The Association of Oncology Social Work's Project to Assure Quality Cancer Care (APAQCC).肿瘤社会工作协会的保证癌症护理质量项目(APAQCC)。
Parental Views of Social Worker and Chaplain Involvement in Care and Decision Making for Critically Ill Children with Cancer.
父母对社会工作者和牧师参与身患癌症危重症儿童护理及决策的看法。
Children (Basel). 2022 Aug 26;9(9):1287. doi: 10.3390/children9091287.
4
Disparities in Psychosocial Distress Screening and Management of Lung and Ovarian Cancer Survivors.肺癌和卵巢癌幸存者的心理社会困扰筛查和管理中的差异。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Oct;18(10):e1704-e1715. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00078. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
5
Coping with breast cancer together: Challenging topics for mothers and their adolescent-young adult (AYA) daughters.共同应对乳腺癌:母亲及其青少年-年轻成年(AYA)女儿面临的挑战。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2022;40(6):756-769. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2021.2005734. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
6
Oncology social work practice behaviors: a national survey of AOSW members.肿瘤社会工作实务行为:AOSW 会员的全国性调查。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2022;40(2):137-151. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2021.1942386. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2018 Jan-Feb;36(1):19-30. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2017.1397832. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
4
The impact of psychosocial intervention on survival in cancer: a meta-analysis.心理社会干预对癌症患者生存的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Palliat Med. 2016 Apr;5(2):93-106. doi: 10.21037/apm.2016.03.06.
5
Institutional capacity to provide psychosocial oncology support services: A report from the Association of Oncology Social Work.提供肿瘤心理学支持服务的机构能力:来自肿瘤社会工作协会的报告。
Cancer. 2016 Jun 15;122(12):1937-45. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30016. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
6
Developing a reliable and valid scale to measure psychosocial acuity.开发一种可靠且有效的量表来测量心理社会敏锐度。
Soc Work Health Care. 2014;53(5):503-17. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2014.898726.
7
Implementing screening for distress: the joint position statement from the American Psychosocial Oncology Society, Association of Oncology Social Work, and Oncology Nursing Society.实施痛苦筛查:美国心理社会肿瘤学会、肿瘤社会工作协会和肿瘤护理学会的联合立场声明。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Sep;40(5):423-4.
8
Effects of psycho-oncologic interventions on emotional distress and quality of life in adult patients with cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.心理肿瘤干预对成年癌症患者情绪困扰和生活质量的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb 20;31(6):782-93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.8922. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
9
Pre-intervention distress moderates the efficacy of psychosocial treatment for cancer patients: a meta-analysis.干预前的困扰程度可调节癌症患者心理社会治疗的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
J Behav Med. 2010 Feb;33(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10865-009-9227-2. Epub 2009 Sep 27.
10
Efficacy and medical cost offset of psychosocial interventions in cancer care: making the case for economic analyses.癌症护理中社会心理干预措施的疗效及医疗成本抵消:开展经济分析的理由
Psychooncology. 2004 Dec;13(12):837-49; discussion 850-6. doi: 10.1002/pon.832.