• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用罗德岛和马萨诸塞州实时发病率估计值优化 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗分配。

Optimal SARS-CoV-2 vaccine allocation using real-time attack-rate estimates in Rhode Island and Massachusetts.

机构信息

Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Department of Statistics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2021 Jul 13;19(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02038-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12916-021-02038-w
PMID:34253200
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8275456/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

When three SARS-CoV-2 vaccines came to market in Europe and North America in the winter of 2020-2021, distribution networks were in a race against a major epidemiological wave of SARS-CoV-2 that began in autumn 2020. Rapid and optimized vaccine allocation was critical during this time. With 95% efficacy reported for two of the vaccines, near-term public health needs likely require that distribution is prioritized to the elderly, health care workers, teachers, essential workers, and individuals with comorbidities putting them at risk of severe clinical progression.

METHODS

We evaluate various age-based vaccine distributions using a validated mathematical model based on current epidemic trends in Rhode Island and Massachusetts. We allow for varying waning efficacy of vaccine-induced immunity, as this has not yet been measured. We account for the fact that known COVID-positive cases may not have been included in the first round of vaccination. And, we account for age-specific immune patterns in both states at the time of the start of the vaccination program. Our analysis assumes that health systems during winter 2020-2021 had equal staffing and capacity to previous phases of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic; we do not consider the effects of understaffed hospitals or unvaccinated medical staff.

RESULTS

We find that allocating a substantial proportion (>75%) of vaccine supply to individuals over the age of 70 is optimal in terms of reducing total cumulative deaths through mid-2021. This result is robust to different profiles of waning vaccine efficacy and several different assumptions on age mixing during and after lockdown periods. As we do not explicitly model other high-mortality groups, our results on vaccine allocation apply to all groups at high risk of mortality if infected. A median of 327 to 340 deaths can be avoided in Rhode Island (3444 to 3647 in Massachusetts) by optimizing vaccine allocation and vaccinating the elderly first. The vaccination campaigns are expected to save a median of 639 to 664 lives in Rhode Island and 6278 to 6618 lives in Massachusetts in the first half of 2021 when compared to a scenario with no vaccine. A policy of vaccinating only seronegative individuals avoids redundancy in vaccine use on individuals that may already be immune, and would result in 0.5% to 1% reductions in cumulative hospitalizations and deaths by mid-2021.

CONCLUSIONS

Assuming high vaccination coverage (>28%) and no major changes in distancing, masking, gathering size, hygiene guidelines, and virus transmissibility between 1 January 2021 and 1 July 2021 a combination of vaccination and population immunity may lead to low or near-zero transmission levels by the second quarter of 2021.

摘要

背景

2020-2021 年冬季,三种 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗在欧洲和北美上市,分销网络正与 2020 年秋季开始的 SARS-CoV-2 主要流行疫情展开竞争。在此期间,快速优化疫苗分配至关重要。由于两种疫苗的有效率均达到 95%,近期的公共卫生需求可能需要将疫苗优先分配给老年人、医护人员、教师、基本工人以及有使他们处于严重临床进展风险的合并症的个体。

方法

我们使用基于罗德岛和马萨诸塞州当前流行趋势的经过验证的数学模型,评估各种基于年龄的疫苗分配情况。我们允许疫苗诱导的免疫效力随时间逐渐减弱,因为这尚未得到测量。我们考虑到第一个疫苗接种轮次中可能未包括已知的 COVID-19 阳性病例。而且,我们考虑了在疫苗接种计划开始时两个州的特定年龄免疫模式。我们的分析假设 2020-2021 年冬季期间卫生系统的人员配备和能力与 SARS-CoV-2 流行的前几个阶段相同;我们不考虑人员配备不足的医院或未接种疫苗的医务人员的影响。

结果

我们发现,通过在 2021 年年中之前减少总累计死亡人数,将大量 (>75%)疫苗供应分配给 70 岁以上的人群是最优的。这一结果在不同的疫苗效力衰减模式和在封锁期间和之后的年龄混合的几种不同假设下都是稳健的。由于我们没有明确对其他高死亡率群体进行建模,因此我们关于疫苗分配的结果适用于所有感染后高死亡率风险的群体。在罗德岛,通过优化疫苗分配并首先为老年人接种疫苗,可以避免 327 至 340 人死亡(马萨诸塞州为 3444 至 3647 人)。与无疫苗接种的情况相比,2021 年上半年,疫苗接种活动预计将在罗德岛挽救 639 至 664 人生命,在马萨诸塞州挽救 6278 至 6618 人生命。仅对血清阴性个体进行疫苗接种可以避免对可能已经具有免疫力的个体重复使用疫苗,并将导致到 2021 年年中累计住院和死亡人数减少 0.5%至 1%。

结论

假设高疫苗接种率(>28%)和 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 7 月 1 日期间的距离、掩蔽、聚会规模、卫生指南和病毒传播性没有重大变化,疫苗接种和人群免疫力的结合可能会导致到 2021 年第二季度传播水平较低或接近零。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a5/8276508/593062cd358f/12916_2021_2038_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a5/8276508/54ee956f0506/12916_2021_2038_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a5/8276508/5a7e7715d749/12916_2021_2038_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a5/8276508/6f46843f1da1/12916_2021_2038_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a5/8276508/c524415fc7c6/12916_2021_2038_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a5/8276508/56f0fce6db75/12916_2021_2038_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a5/8276508/3e89e5d4d61d/12916_2021_2038_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a5/8276508/593062cd358f/12916_2021_2038_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a5/8276508/54ee956f0506/12916_2021_2038_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a5/8276508/5a7e7715d749/12916_2021_2038_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a5/8276508/6f46843f1da1/12916_2021_2038_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a5/8276508/c524415fc7c6/12916_2021_2038_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a5/8276508/56f0fce6db75/12916_2021_2038_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a5/8276508/3e89e5d4d61d/12916_2021_2038_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70a5/8276508/593062cd358f/12916_2021_2038_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimal SARS-CoV-2 vaccine allocation using real-time attack-rate estimates in Rhode Island and Massachusetts.利用罗德岛和马萨诸塞州实时发病率估计值优化 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗分配。
BMC Med. 2021 Jul 13;19(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02038-w.
2
Optimal SARS-CoV-2 vaccine allocation using real-time seroprevalence estimates in Rhode Island and Massachusetts.利用罗德岛州和马萨诸塞州的实时血清流行率估计值进行最佳的新冠病毒疫苗分配
medRxiv. 2021 Jan 15:2021.01.12.21249694. doi: 10.1101/2021.01.12.21249694.
3
SARS-CoV-2 Attack Rate and Population Immunity in Southern New England, March 2020 to May 2021.2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 5 月,新英格兰南部的 SARS-CoV-2 发病率和人群免疫力。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2214171. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14171.
4
Non-pharmaceutical interventions, vaccination, and the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant in England: a mathematical modelling study.非药物干预措施、疫苗接种和 SARS-CoV-2 德尔塔变异株在英国:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet. 2021 Nov 13;398(10313):1825-1835. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02276-5. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
5
Optimal vaccine allocation for COVID-19 in the Netherlands: A data-driven prioritization.优化 COVID-19 疫苗在荷兰的分配:基于数据的优先级排序。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Dec 13;17(12):e1009697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009697. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
Model-Estimated Association Between Simulated US Elementary School-Related SARS-CoV-2 Transmission, Mitigation Interventions, and Vaccine Coverage Across Local Incidence Levels.模型估计的美国小学相关 SARS-CoV-2 传播、缓解干预措施与疫苗接种率之间的关联,按当地发病水平分类。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2147827. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.47827.
7
Prioritising COVID-19 vaccination in changing social and epidemiological landscapes: a mathematical modelling study.在不断变化的社会和流行病学背景下优先考虑 COVID-19 疫苗接种:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Aug;21(8):1097-1106. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00057-8. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
8
Association of Simulated COVID-19 Vaccination and Nonpharmaceutical Interventions With Infections, Hospitalizations, and Mortality.模拟 COVID-19 疫苗接种和非药物干预措施与感染、住院和死亡的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2110782. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10782.
9
The potential health and economic value of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination alongside physical distancing in the UK: a transmission model-based future scenario analysis and economic evaluation.英国新冠病毒疫苗接种与保持社交距离相结合的潜在健康和经济价值:基于传播模型的未来情景分析与经济评估
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;21(7):962-974. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00079-7. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
10
Modelling direct and herd protection effects of vaccination against the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in Australia.建模澳大利亚针对 SARS-CoV-2 Delta 变异株的疫苗接种对直接和群体保护的效果。
Med J Aust. 2021 Nov 1;215(9):427-432. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51263. Epub 2021 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A network-based model to assess vaccination strategies for the COVID-19 pandemic by using Bayesian optimization.一种基于网络的模型,用于通过贝叶斯优化评估针对新冠疫情的疫苗接种策略。
Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2024 Apr;181. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.114695. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
2
Probiotics supplements for the prevention of atopic dermatitis in children: an umbrella review.用于预防儿童特应性皮炎的益生菌补充剂:一项综合综述。
Front Nutr. 2025 Jul 15;12:1587348. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1587348. eCollection 2025.
3
Optimal COVID-19 vaccine prioritization by age depends critically on inter-group contacts and vaccination rates.

本文引用的文献

1
SARS-CoV-2 epidemic after social and economic reopening in three U.S. states reveals shifts in age structure and clinical characteristics.美国三个州重新开放社会和经济后发生的 SARS-CoV-2 疫情揭示了年龄结构和临床特征的变化。
Sci Adv. 2022 Jan 28;8(4):eabf9868. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf9868. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
2
Effect of Vaccination on Household Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in England.疫苗接种对英国SARS-CoV-2家庭传播的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 19;385(8):759-760. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2107717. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
3
Modelling optimal vaccination strategy for SARS-CoV-2 in the UK.
按年龄对新冠病毒疫苗进行优化优先排序,关键取决于群体间接触情况和疫苗接种率。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Dec 4;11(12):240753. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240753. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Influenza vaccine allocation in tropical settings under constrained resources.资源受限情况下热带地区的流感疫苗分配
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Oct 1;3(10):pgae379. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae379. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review of mathematical vaccine prioritization models.从新冠疫情中学习:数学疫苗优先排序模型的系统综述
Infect Dis Model. 2024 May 15;9(4):1057-1080. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2024.05.005. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Incorporating social determinants of health into transmission modeling of COVID-19 vaccine in the US: a scoping review.将健康的社会决定因素纳入美国 COVID-19 疫苗传播模型:一项范围综述。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Jun 7;35:100806. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100806. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Vaccination for communicable endemic diseases: optimal allocation of initial and booster vaccine doses.传染病疫苗接种:初始和加强疫苗剂量的最佳分配。
J Math Biol. 2024 Jun 26;89(2):21. doi: 10.1007/s00285-024-02111-x.
8
Assessing the dynamics and impact of COVID-19 vaccination on disease spread: A data-driven approach.评估新冠疫苗接种对疾病传播的动态变化及影响:一种数据驱动的方法。
Infect Dis Model. 2024 Mar 12;9(2):527-556. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2024.02.010. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Learning from the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review of mathematical vaccine prioritization models.从新冠疫情中学习:数学疫苗优先级模型的系统综述
medRxiv. 2024 Mar 7:2024.03.04.24303726. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.04.24303726.
10
Influenza vaccination allocation in tropical settings under constrained resources.资源受限情况下热带地区的流感疫苗分配
medRxiv. 2024 Feb 9:2024.02.08.24302551. doi: 10.1101/2024.02.08.24302551.
在英国建立 SARS-CoV-2 的最佳疫苗接种策略模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 May 6;17(5):e1008849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008849. eCollection 2021 May.
4
Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 Variants.BNT162b2新冠疫苗对B.1.1.7和B.1.351变异株的有效性
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jul 8;385(2):187-189. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2104974. Epub 2021 May 5.
5
Within-country age-based prioritisation, global allocation, and public health impact of a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: A mathematical modelling analysis.针对 SARS-CoV-2 的疫苗在国内的年龄优先排序、全球分配和对公共卫生的影响:一项数学建模分析。
Vaccine. 2021 May 21;39(22):2995-3006. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
6
Vaccine optimization for COVID-19: Who to vaccinate first?2019冠状病毒病疫苗优化:优先接种对象为谁?
Sci Adv. 2021 Feb 3;7(6). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf1374. Print 2020 Feb.
7
Model-informed COVID-19 vaccine prioritization strategies by age and serostatus.基于模型的 COVID-19 疫苗优先接种策略,按年龄和血清学状态分层。
Science. 2021 Feb 26;371(6532):916-921. doi: 10.1126/science.abe6959. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
8
CoMix: comparing mixing patterns in the Belgian population during and after lockdown.混合:比较封锁期间和之后比利时人群的混合模式。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 14;10(1):21885. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78540-7.
9
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' Interim Recommendation for Allocating Initial Supplies of COVID-19 Vaccine - United States, 2020.免疫实践咨询委员会关于分配 COVID-19 疫苗初始供应的临时建议-美国,2020 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Dec 11;69(49):1857-1859. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6949e1.
10
Assessing the age specificity of infection fatality rates for COVID-19: systematic review, meta-analysis, and public policy implications.评估 COVID-19 感染病死率的年龄特异性:系统评价、荟萃分析及公共政策意义。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Dec;35(12):1123-1138. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00698-1. Epub 2020 Dec 8.