Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Department of Statistics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
BMC Med. 2021 Jul 13;19(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02038-w.
When three SARS-CoV-2 vaccines came to market in Europe and North America in the winter of 2020-2021, distribution networks were in a race against a major epidemiological wave of SARS-CoV-2 that began in autumn 2020. Rapid and optimized vaccine allocation was critical during this time. With 95% efficacy reported for two of the vaccines, near-term public health needs likely require that distribution is prioritized to the elderly, health care workers, teachers, essential workers, and individuals with comorbidities putting them at risk of severe clinical progression.
We evaluate various age-based vaccine distributions using a validated mathematical model based on current epidemic trends in Rhode Island and Massachusetts. We allow for varying waning efficacy of vaccine-induced immunity, as this has not yet been measured. We account for the fact that known COVID-positive cases may not have been included in the first round of vaccination. And, we account for age-specific immune patterns in both states at the time of the start of the vaccination program. Our analysis assumes that health systems during winter 2020-2021 had equal staffing and capacity to previous phases of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic; we do not consider the effects of understaffed hospitals or unvaccinated medical staff.
We find that allocating a substantial proportion (>75%) of vaccine supply to individuals over the age of 70 is optimal in terms of reducing total cumulative deaths through mid-2021. This result is robust to different profiles of waning vaccine efficacy and several different assumptions on age mixing during and after lockdown periods. As we do not explicitly model other high-mortality groups, our results on vaccine allocation apply to all groups at high risk of mortality if infected. A median of 327 to 340 deaths can be avoided in Rhode Island (3444 to 3647 in Massachusetts) by optimizing vaccine allocation and vaccinating the elderly first. The vaccination campaigns are expected to save a median of 639 to 664 lives in Rhode Island and 6278 to 6618 lives in Massachusetts in the first half of 2021 when compared to a scenario with no vaccine. A policy of vaccinating only seronegative individuals avoids redundancy in vaccine use on individuals that may already be immune, and would result in 0.5% to 1% reductions in cumulative hospitalizations and deaths by mid-2021.
Assuming high vaccination coverage (>28%) and no major changes in distancing, masking, gathering size, hygiene guidelines, and virus transmissibility between 1 January 2021 and 1 July 2021 a combination of vaccination and population immunity may lead to low or near-zero transmission levels by the second quarter of 2021.
2020-2021 年冬季,三种 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗在欧洲和北美上市,分销网络正与 2020 年秋季开始的 SARS-CoV-2 主要流行疫情展开竞争。在此期间,快速优化疫苗分配至关重要。由于两种疫苗的有效率均达到 95%,近期的公共卫生需求可能需要将疫苗优先分配给老年人、医护人员、教师、基本工人以及有使他们处于严重临床进展风险的合并症的个体。
我们使用基于罗德岛和马萨诸塞州当前流行趋势的经过验证的数学模型,评估各种基于年龄的疫苗分配情况。我们允许疫苗诱导的免疫效力随时间逐渐减弱,因为这尚未得到测量。我们考虑到第一个疫苗接种轮次中可能未包括已知的 COVID-19 阳性病例。而且,我们考虑了在疫苗接种计划开始时两个州的特定年龄免疫模式。我们的分析假设 2020-2021 年冬季期间卫生系统的人员配备和能力与 SARS-CoV-2 流行的前几个阶段相同;我们不考虑人员配备不足的医院或未接种疫苗的医务人员的影响。
我们发现,通过在 2021 年年中之前减少总累计死亡人数,将大量 (>75%)疫苗供应分配给 70 岁以上的人群是最优的。这一结果在不同的疫苗效力衰减模式和在封锁期间和之后的年龄混合的几种不同假设下都是稳健的。由于我们没有明确对其他高死亡率群体进行建模,因此我们关于疫苗分配的结果适用于所有感染后高死亡率风险的群体。在罗德岛,通过优化疫苗分配并首先为老年人接种疫苗,可以避免 327 至 340 人死亡(马萨诸塞州为 3444 至 3647 人)。与无疫苗接种的情况相比,2021 年上半年,疫苗接种活动预计将在罗德岛挽救 639 至 664 人生命,在马萨诸塞州挽救 6278 至 6618 人生命。仅对血清阴性个体进行疫苗接种可以避免对可能已经具有免疫力的个体重复使用疫苗,并将导致到 2021 年年中累计住院和死亡人数减少 0.5%至 1%。
假设高疫苗接种率(>28%)和 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 7 月 1 日期间的距离、掩蔽、聚会规模、卫生指南和病毒传播性没有重大变化,疫苗接种和人群免疫力的结合可能会导致到 2021 年第二季度传播水平较低或接近零。