• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

首次接触昆虫叮咬后的过敏反应。

Allergic reactions following first insect sting exposure.

作者信息

Reisman R E, Osur S L

机构信息

Buffalo General Hospital, Department of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo 14203.

出版信息

Ann Allergy. 1987 Dec;59(6):429-32.

PMID:3425982
Abstract

Over a 10-year period, 750 patients were evaluated because of anaphylaxis following insect stings. Sixty-five patients were identified who had reactions after their first sting exposure. Their clinical features and symptoms of anaphylaxis were the same as the much larger group of patients who had allergic reactions following prior exposure to insect stings. When evaluated following the sting reaction, the majority of these patients had venom-specific IgE detected by skin test or in the serum by the RAST. Fifty-three re-stings occurred in 31 patients. In untreated or whole body extract-treated patients, there were 43 re-stings resulting in 13 reactions. There were no reactions following 10 re-stings in venom-treated patients. In a subgroup of 15 patients with undetectable venom-specific IgE, there were 16 re-stings in eight patients, leading to three systemic reactions. The occurrence of allergic reactions following first sting exposure adds further support to the thesis that some sting reactions are non-IgE-mediated.

摘要

在10年期间,750名因昆虫叮咬后发生过敏反应的患者接受了评估。65名患者在首次接触叮咬后出现了反应。他们过敏反应的临床特征和症状与之前接触昆虫叮咬后发生过敏反应的规模大得多的患者群体相同。在叮咬反应后进行评估时,这些患者中的大多数通过皮肤试验或RAST在血清中检测到了毒液特异性IgE。31名患者发生了53次再次叮咬。在未治疗或接受全身提取物治疗的患者中,有43次再次叮咬导致13次反应。毒液治疗的患者在10次再次叮咬后没有出现反应。在15名毒液特异性IgE检测不到的患者亚组中,8名患者发生了16次再次叮咬,导致3次全身反应。首次接触叮咬后发生过敏反应进一步支持了某些叮咬反应是非IgE介导的这一论点。

相似文献

1
Allergic reactions following first insect sting exposure.首次接触昆虫叮咬后的过敏反应。
Ann Allergy. 1987 Dec;59(6):429-32.
2
The value of immunotherapy with venom in children with allergy to insect stings.昆虫叮咬过敏儿童使用毒液免疫疗法的价值。
N Engl J Med. 1990 Dec 6;323(23):1601-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199012063232305.
3
Hymenoptera sting anaphylaxis: detection and clinical significance of individual bee and wasp venoms specific IgE and IgG4 antibodies.膜翅目昆虫叮咬过敏反应:蜜蜂和黄蜂毒液特异性IgE及IgG4抗体的检测及其临床意义
Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi. 1993 Jun;47(3):207-12.
4
Insect sting allergy with negative venom skin test responses.毒液皮肤试验反应阴性的昆虫叮咬过敏
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 May;107(5):897-901. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.114706.
5
Prevalence and clinical relevance of specific immunoglobulin E to pollen caused by sting- induced specific immunoglobulin E to cross-reacting carbohydrate determinants in Hymenoptera venoms.膜翅目毒液中叮咬诱导的特异性免疫球蛋白E与交叉反应性碳水化合物决定簇引起的花粉特异性免疫球蛋白E的患病率及临床相关性。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2005 Apr;35(4):441-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02217.x.
6
Long-term protection after stopping venom immunotherapy: results of re-stings in 200 patients.停止毒液免疫治疗后的长期保护作用:200例患者再次被蜇伤的结果
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998 May;101(5):606-12. doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(98)70167-8.
7
[The wasp/mosquito syndrome].[黄蜂/蚊子综合征]
Allerg Immunol (Paris). 1999 Jun;31(6):175-84.
8
[Epidemiological and clinical study on bee venom allergy among beekeepers].[养蜂人蜂毒过敏的流行病学与临床研究]
Boll Ist Sieroter Milan. 1988;67(5-6):386-92.
9
Maintenance venom immunotherapy administered at 3-month intervals is both safe and efficacious.每3个月进行一次的维持性毒液免疫疗法既安全又有效。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 May;107(5):902-6. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.114986.
10
Insect sting anaphylaxis in patients without detectable serum venom-specific IgE.血清中未检测到毒液特异性IgE的患者发生昆虫叮咬过敏反应。
Clin Allergy. 1985 Jul;15(4):329-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1985.tb03000.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Serum IgG subclass antibodies to a variety of food antigens in patients with coeliac disease.乳糜泻患者针对多种食物抗原的血清IgG亚类抗体
Gut. 1992 May;33(5):632-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.33.5.632.