Suppr超能文献

一项关于评估将正式和体验式公众与患者参与培训融入结构化博士项目的过程及影响的方案。

A protocol for the evaluation of the process and impact of embedding formal and experiential Public and Patient Involvement training in a structured PhD programme.

作者信息

Foley Louise, Kiely Bridget, Croke Aisling, Larkin James, Smith Susan M, Clyne Barbara, Pierce Maria, Murphy Edel

机构信息

School of Psychology, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

J Multimorb Comorb. 2021 Jun 28;11:26335565211024793. doi: 10.1177/26335565211024793. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incorporating Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) into doctoral research is valued by PhD scholars. The importance of providing early career researchers with appropriate education and training to develop skills to conduct meaningful involvement has been articulated. The Collaborative Doctoral Award in MultiMorbidity (CDA-MM) PhD programme embedded formal PPI training as a postgraduate education component. Four PhD scholars taking part in the CDA-MM established a PPI panel comprising people, and carers of people, living with multimorbidity (≥2 chronic conditions), presenting an opportuning for experiential PPI training. The proposed study aims to evaluate the process and impact of formal and experiential PPI training during a PhD programme.

DESIGN

Embedding PPI training in a PhD programme is a novel approach. This evaluation will include a process evaluation to provide an understanding of the workings of the PPI panel and explore the experiences of key stakeholders involved, and an impact evaluation to assess the impact of embedding PPI training in a PhD programme. This study is a longitudinal mixed-methods evaluation, conducted over 24 months. Participants include PhD scholars, PPI contributors and PhD supervisors. An independent researcher not aligned with the CDA-MM will lead the evaluation. Data collection methods include focus groups, individual interviews, an impact log and group reflections. Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic and content analysis and quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics.

DISCUSSION

This evaluation will report the learnings from embedding formal and experiential PPI training and education across a PhD programme.

摘要

背景

将公众和患者参与(PPI)纳入博士研究受到博士生的重视。人们已经明确指出,为早期职业研究人员提供适当的教育和培训以培养进行有意义参与的技能非常重要。多病症协作博士奖(CDA-MM)博士项目将正式的PPI培训作为研究生教育的一个组成部分。参与CDA-MM项目的四名博士生成立了一个PPI小组,成员包括患有多种病症(≥2种慢性病)的患者及其护理人员,这为体验式PPI培训提供了契机。拟开展的研究旨在评估博士项目中正式和体验式PPI培训的过程及影响。

设计

将PPI培训融入博士项目是一种新颖的方法。此次评估将包括过程评估,以了解PPI小组的运作情况并探索相关关键利益相关者的经历,以及影响评估,以评估将PPI培训融入博士项目的影响。本研究是一项为期24个月的纵向混合方法评估。参与者包括博士生、PPI贡献者和博士导师。一名与CDA-MM无关的独立研究人员将领导此次评估。数据收集方法包括焦点小组、个人访谈、影响日志和小组反思。定性数据将采用主题分析和内容分析进行分析,定量数据将采用描述性统计进行分析。

讨论

本次评估将报告在整个博士项目中融入正式和体验式PPI培训与教育的经验教训。

相似文献

1
A protocol for the evaluation of the process and impact of embedding formal and experiential Public and Patient Involvement training in a structured PhD programme.
J Multimorb Comorb. 2021 Jun 28;11:26335565211024793. doi: 10.1177/26335565211024793. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
3
A protocol to evaluate the impact of embedding Public and Patient Involvement in a structured PhD program for stroke care.
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Jul 22;3:877598. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.877598. eCollection 2022.
4
Evaluation of a national training programme to support engagement in mental health services: Learning enablers and learning gains.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;26(9-10):323-336. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12535. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
5
Patient and public involvement in doctoral research: reflections and experiences of the PPI contributors and researcher.
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 May 11;6:23. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00201-w. eCollection 2020.
7
Reflections on qualitative data analysis training for PPI partners and its implementation into practice.
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Aug 14;5:22. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0156-0. eCollection 2019.
10
Evaluating the impact of patient and carer involvement in suicide and self-harm research: A mixed-methods, longitudinal study protocol.
Health Expect. 2021 May;24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):47-53. doi: 10.1111/hex.13000. Epub 2019 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolution of Patient Empowerment and Its Impact on Health Care's Future.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 1;27:e60562. doi: 10.2196/60562.
2
Evaluating public and patient involvement in interventional research-A newly developed checklist (EPPIIC).
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 5;19(11):e0301314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301314. eCollection 2024.
4
Research Buddy partnership in a MD-PhD program: lessons learned.
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Feb 18;9(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00414-9.
6
A protocol to evaluate the impact of embedding Public and Patient Involvement in a structured PhD program for stroke care.
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Jul 22;3:877598. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.877598. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Engagement of older adults with multimorbidity as patient research partners: Lessons from a patient-oriented research program.
J Multimorb Comorb. 2021 Mar 17;11:2633556521999508. doi: 10.1177/2633556521999508. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
2
The impact of public involvement in health research: what are we measuring? Why are we measuring it? Should we stop measuring it?
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Oct 27;6:63. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00239-w. eCollection 2020.
3
Conducting in-depth interviews with and without voice recorders: a comparative analysis.
Qual Res. 2020 Oct;20(5):565-581. doi: 10.1177/1468794119884806. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
4
Patient and public involvement in doctoral research: reflections and experiences of the PPI contributors and researcher.
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 May 11;6:23. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00201-w. eCollection 2020.
5
PPI in research: a reflection from early stage researchers.
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Nov 19;5:35. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0170-2. eCollection 2019.
6
Patient and public involvement in doctoral research: Impact, resources and recommendations.
Health Expect. 2020 Feb;23(1):125-136. doi: 10.1111/hex.12976. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
7
Patient and public involvement in designing and conducting doctoral research: the whys and the hows.
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Aug 16;5:23. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0155-1. eCollection 2019.
8
Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot.
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):785-801. doi: 10.1111/hex.12888. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
9
Evaluating patient and public involvement in research.
BMJ. 2018 Dec 6;363:k5147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k5147.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验