School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 5;19(11):e0301314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301314. eCollection 2024.
Public and patient involvement (PPI) has been identified as an increasingly desired and, often, required component of trial methodology-leading to higher quality, more accessible and relevant clinical research, alongside increased recruitment, funding success and insight into research impact. However, despite the great variety of frameworks and checklists available for assessing PPI, most are limited with respect to important features (e.g. applicable in specific contexts only, fail to clarify what should be assessed and reported, lack the necessary comprehensiveness or are biased in favour of researcher reporting). Thus, the current research aimed to address such limitations through the development of a new checklist, the EPPIIC, through review, thematic analysis and 'meta-evaluation' in conjunction with PPI engagement. Upon completion of the EPPIIC, three thematic 'sub-scales' emerged: (1) Policy & Practice, (2) Participatory Culture and (3) Influence & Impact. All findings are presented and discussed in light of theory and research. Notably, findings recommend EPPIIC as a useful means of assessing PPI in future trials.
公众和患者参与(PPI)已被确定为试验方法越来越需要的组成部分,通常也是必需的,这导致了更高质量、更易获取和更相关的临床研究,以及更高的招募率、资金成功率和对研究影响的深入了解。然而,尽管有各种各样的框架和清单可用于评估 PPI,但大多数都存在重要特征的局限性(例如仅适用于特定情况,未能澄清应评估和报告什么,缺乏必要的全面性或偏向于研究人员报告)。因此,目前的研究旨在通过开发一个新的清单 EPPIIC 来解决这些限制,该清单是通过审查、主题分析和“元评估”以及 PPI 参与相结合而开发的。在完成 EPPIIC 后,出现了三个主题“子量表”:(1)政策与实践,(2)参与文化,(3)影响与影响。所有的发现都根据理论和研究进行了呈现和讨论。值得注意的是,研究结果建议 EPPIIC 是未来试验中评估 PPI 的有用手段。