• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 COVID-19 管理和预防方面的临床试验:一项元流行病学研究,考察了方法学质量。

Clinical trials in COVID-19 management & prevention: A meta-epidemiological study examining methodological quality.

机构信息

Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street London, Ontario, N6A 3K7, Canada.

Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4L8, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;139:68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.07.002. Epub 2021 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.07.002
PMID:34274489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8280397/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the characteristics of Covid-19 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and examine the association between trial characteristics and the likelihood of finding a significant effect.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a systematic review to identify RCTs (up to October 21, 2020) evaluating drugs or blood products to treat or prevent Covid-19. We extracted trial characteristics (number of centers, funding sources, and sample size) and assessed risk of bias (RoB) using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. We performed logistic regressions to evaluate the association between RoB due to randomization, single vs. multicentre, funding source, and sample size, and finding a statistically significant effect.

RESULTS

We included 91 RCTs (n = 46,802); 40 (44%) were single-center, 23 (25.3%) enrolled <50 patients, 28 (30.8%) received industry funding, and 75 (82.4%) had high or probably high RoB. Thirty-eight trials (41.8%) reported a statistically significant effect. RoB due to randomization and being a single-center trial were associated with increased odds of finding a statistically significant effect.

CONCLUSIONS

There is high variability in RoB among Covid-19 trials. Researchers, funders, and knowledge-users should be cognizant of the impact of RoB due to randomization and single-center trial status in designing, evaluating, and interpreting the results of RCTs.

REGISTRATION

CRD42020192095.

摘要

目的

描述 COVID-19 随机临床试验(RCT)的特征,并研究试验特征与发现显著效果的可能性之间的关系。

研究设计

我们进行了系统综述,以确定评估药物或血液制品治疗或预防 COVID-19 的 RCT(截至 2020 年 10 月 21 日)。我们提取了试验特征(中心数量、资金来源和样本量),并使用 Cochrane RoB 2.0 工具评估了偏倚风险(RoB)。我们进行了逻辑回归,以评估随机分组、单中心与多中心、资金来源和样本量与发现统计学显著效果之间的关系。

结果

我们纳入了 91 项 RCT(n=46802);40 项(44%)为单中心,23 项(25.3%)纳入的患者<50 例,28 项(30.8%)获得了产业资金,75 项(82.4%)的 RoB 为高或极可能高。38 项试验(41.8%)报告了统计学显著效果。随机分组和单中心试验的 RoB 与发现统计学显著效果的可能性增加相关。

结论

COVID-19 试验的 RoB 存在高度变异性。研究人员、资助者和知识使用者在设计、评估和解释 RCT 的结果时,应意识到随机分组和单中心试验状态的 RoB 的影响。

登记号

CRD42020192095。

相似文献

1
Clinical trials in COVID-19 management & prevention: A meta-epidemiological study examining methodological quality.在 COVID-19 管理和预防方面的临床试验:一项元流行病学研究,考察了方法学质量。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;139:68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.07.002. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials.一项meta流行病学研究,旨在检验新生儿试验中偏倚与治疗效果之间的关联。
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Dec;9(4):1052-9. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1985.
5
Bias in Hand Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials: Systematic Review and Meta-Epidemiological Study.手部外科随机对照试验中的偏倚:系统评价和荟萃流行病学研究。
J Hand Surg Am. 2022 Jun;47(6):526-533. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.01.027. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
6
Risk of bias assessments and reporting quality of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials examining acupuncture for depression: An overview and meta-epidemiology study.系统评价和随机对照试验评估针刺治疗抑郁症的偏倚风险和报告质量:概述和荟萃流行病学研究。
J Evid Based Med. 2020 Feb;13(1):25-33. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12372.
7
Risk of Bias in Iranian Randomized Trials Included in Cochrane Reviews.伊朗 Cochrane 综述纳入的随机试验偏倚风险。
Arch Iran Med. 2022 Jun 1;25(6):375-382. doi: 10.34172/aim.2022.61.
8
Methodological characteristics and treatment effect sizes in oral health randomised controlled trials: Is there a relationship? Protocol for a meta-epidemiological study.口腔健康随机对照试验的方法学特征与治疗效应量:它们之间有关系吗?一项元流行病学研究方案
BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 25;4(2):e004527. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004527.
9
Overall bias and sample sizes were unchanged in ICU trials over time: a meta-epidemiological study.总体偏倚和样本量在 ICU 试验中随时间变化保持不变:一项meta 流行病学研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Sep;113:189-199. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.021. Epub 2019 May 28.
10
Evaluating the methodology of studies conducted during the global COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.评价全球 COVID-19 大流行期间开展的研究方法:一项随机对照试验的系统评价。
J Integr Med. 2021 Jul;19(4):317-326. doi: 10.1016/j.joim.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Features and results availability of non-commercial Spanish COVID-19 trials: a systematic review of clinical trial registers and corresponding literature.非商业性西班牙新冠病毒疾病试验的特征及结果可获取性:对临床试验登记册及相关文献的系统综述
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Mar;81(3):429-439. doi: 10.1007/s00228-024-03791-6. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
2
Underpowered trials at trial start and informed consent: action is needed beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.试验开始时样本量不足的试验与知情同意:在新冠疫情之外还需要采取行动。
J R Soc Med. 2025 Feb;118(2):42-44. doi: 10.1177/01410768241290075. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
3
The Efficacy of Multivitamin, Vitamin A, Vitamin B, Vitamin C, and Vitamin D Supplements in the Prevention and Management of COVID-19 and Long-COVID: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Colchicine on COVID-19 patients: A Clinical Trial Study.秋水仙碱对新冠肺炎患者的影响:一项临床试验研究。
Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2022 Jun 30;33(2):232-236. doi: 10.31138/mjr.33.2.232. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
A Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Clinical Trial of Azvudine Tablets in the Treatment of Mild and Common COVID-19, a Pilot Study.阿兹夫定片治疗轻型和普通型新型冠状病毒肺炎的随机、开放、对照临床试验:一项探索性研究
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2020 Oct;7(19):e2001435. doi: 10.1002/advs.202001435. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
3
A Randomized, Single-Blind, Group Sequential, Active-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of α-Lipoic Acid for Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).
多种维生素、维生素 A、维生素 B、维生素 C 和维生素 D 补充剂在预防和管理 COVID-19 和长新冠方面的功效:一项随机临床试验的更新系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutrients. 2024 Apr 29;16(9):1345. doi: 10.3390/nu16091345.
4
Clinical trials and their impact on policy during COVID-19: a review.COVID-19期间的临床试验及其对政策的影响:综述
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Jan 30;9:20. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19305.1. eCollection 2024.
5
Adaptive, platform trials assessing therapies for hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Informed consent forms omitted a few important elements of information.针对住院 COVID-19 患者的治疗方法的适应性、平台试验:知情同意书省略了一些重要的信息要素。
J Glob Health. 2023 May 12;13:06019. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.06019.
6
The relationship between pragmatism, timing, and study size on impact of randomized trials: a qualitative, hypothesis generating study of trials of systemic corticosteroids for COVID-19.实用主义、时机和研究规模对随机试验影响的关系:一项针对 COVID-19 全身皮质类固醇治疗试验的定性、生成假设研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Dec;152:116-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.09.018. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
7
Artificial intelligence in COVID-19 evidence syntheses was underutilized, but impactful: a methodological study.人工智能在 COVID-19 证据综合中的应用未得到充分利用,但具有影响力:一项方法学研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Aug;148:124-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.04.027. Epub 2022 May 2.
8
The Fragility of Statistically Significant Results in Randomized Clinical Trials for COVID-19.COVID-19 随机临床试验中统计学显著结果的脆弱性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e222973. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2973.
9
How informative were early SARS-CoV-2 treatment and prevention trials? a longitudinal cohort analysis of trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.早期 SARS-CoV-2 治疗和预防试验有多大信息量?对 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册的试验进行的纵向队列分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):e0262114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262114. eCollection 2022.
一项随机、单盲、成组序贯、活性对照研究,旨在评估α-硫辛酸对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)危重症患者的临床疗效和安全性。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 4;8:566609. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.566609. eCollection 2021.
4
Pre-exposure prophylaxis with hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial.羟氯喹用于 COVID-19 的暴露前预防:一项双盲、安慰剂对照的随机临床试验。
Trials. 2021 Nov 15;22(1):808. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05758-9.
5
Patient-important outcomes reported in randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatments for COVID-19: a protocol of a META-epidemiological study.新型冠状病毒肺炎药物治疗的随机对照试验中报告的患者重要结局:一项 META-流行病学研究方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 1;10(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01838-8.
6
Nature and Dimensions of Systemic Hyperinflammation and its Attenuation by Convalescent Plasma in Severe COVID-19.严重 COVID-19 中系统性过度炎症的性质和程度及其恢复期血浆的衰减作用。
J Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 16;224(4):565-574. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab010.
7
Safety and efficacy of a COVID-19 treatment with nebulized and/or intravenous neutral electrolyzed saline combined with usual medical care vs. usual medical care alone: A randomized, open-label, controlled trial.雾化和/或静脉注射中性电解盐水联合常规医疗护理与单纯常规医疗护理治疗COVID-19的安全性和有效性:一项随机、开放标签、对照试验。
Exp Ther Med. 2021 Sep;22(3):915. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10347. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
8
Telmisartan for treatment of Covid-19 patients: An open multicenter randomized clinical trial.替米沙坦治疗新冠肺炎患者:一项开放的多中心随机临床试验。
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jun 18;37:100962. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100962. eCollection 2021 Jul.
9
Tocilizumab in patients with moderate or severe COVID-19: a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter trial.托珠单抗治疗中度或重度新型冠状病毒肺炎患者:一项随机、对照、开放标签、多中心试验。
Front Med. 2021 Jun;15(3):486-494. doi: 10.1007/s11684-020-0824-3. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
10
Safety and Outcomes Associated with the Pharmacological Inhibition of the Kinin-Kallikrein System in Severe COVID-19.严重 COVID-19 中激肽-激肽释放酶系统的药理学抑制与安全性和结局的相关性。
Viruses. 2021 Feb 16;13(2):309. doi: 10.3390/v13020309.