• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型冠状病毒肺炎药物治疗的随机对照试验中报告的患者重要结局:一项 META-流行病学研究方案。

Patient-important outcomes reported in randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatments for COVID-19: a protocol of a META-epidemiological study.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, 111711, Colombia.

Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 1;10(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01838-8.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-021-01838-8
PMID:34724980
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8559914/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 19 (covid-19) pandemic has underscored the need to expedite clinical research, which may lead investigators to shift away from measuring patient-important outcomes (PIO), limiting research applicability. We aim to investigate if randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of covid-19 pharmacological therapies include PIOs.

METHODS

We will perform a meta-epidemiological study of RCTs that included people at risk for, or with suspected, probable, or confirmed covid-19, examining any pharmacological treatment or blood product aimed at prophylaxis or treatment. We will obtain data from all RCTs identified in a living network metanalysis (NMA). The main data sources are the living WHO covid-19 database up to 1 March 2021 and six additional Chinese databases up to 20 February 2021. Two reviewers independently will review each citation, full-text article, and abstract data. To categorize the outcomes according to their importance to patients, we will adapt a previously defined hierarchy: a) mortality, b) quality of life/ functional status/symptoms, c) morbidity, and d) surrogate outcomes. Outcomes within the category a) and b) will be considered critically important to patients, and outcomes within the category c) will be regarded as important. We will use descriptive statistics to assess the proportion of studies that report each category of outcomes. We will perform univariable and multivariable analysis to explore associations between trial characteristics and the likelihood of reporting PIOs.

DISCUSSION

The findings from this meta-epidemiological study will help health care professionals and researchers understand if the current covid-19 trials are effectively assessing and reporting the outcomes that are important to patients. If a deficiency in capturing PIOs is identified, this information may help inform the development of future RCTs in covid-19.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATIONS

Open Science Framework registration: osf.io/6xgjz .

摘要

背景

2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行凸显了加快临床研究的必要性,这可能导致研究人员不再关注患者重要结局(PIO),从而限制了研究的适用性。我们旨在调查 COVID-19 药物治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)是否包含 PIO。

方法

我们将对纳入有 COVID-19 发病风险或疑似、可能或确诊 COVID-19 的人群的 RCT 进行一项meta 流行病学研究,研究对象为预防或治疗用的任何药物治疗或血液制品。我们将从一项正在进行的网络荟萃分析(NMA)中获得所有 RCT 的数据。主要数据源是截至 2021 年 3 月 1 日的世界卫生组织(WHO)COVID-19 数据库和截至 2021 年 2 月 20 日的六个额外的中国数据库。两名评审员将独立审查每条引文、全文文章和摘要数据。为了根据对患者的重要性对结局进行分类,我们将采用之前定义的层级:a)死亡率,b)生活质量/功能状态/症状,c)发病率,和 d)替代结局。类别 a)和 b)中的结局被认为对患者至关重要,类别 c)中的结局则被认为是重要的。我们将使用描述性统计来评估报告每个结局类别的研究比例。我们将进行单变量和多变量分析,以探讨试验特征与报告 PIO 可能性之间的关联。

讨论

这项 meta 流行病学研究的结果将帮助医疗保健专业人员和研究人员了解当前的 COVID-19 试验是否有效地评估和报告对患者重要的结局。如果发现缺乏对 PIO 的捕获,这些信息可能有助于为 COVID-19 的未来 RCT 提供信息。

系统评价注册

开放科学框架注册:osf.io/6xgjz。

相似文献

1
Patient-important outcomes reported in randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatments for COVID-19: a protocol of a META-epidemiological study.新型冠状病毒肺炎药物治疗的随机对照试验中报告的患者重要结局:一项 META-流行病学研究方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 1;10(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01838-8.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
PROTECT Trial: A cluster-randomized study with hydroxychloroquine versus observational support for prevention or early-phase treatment of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.PROTECT 试验:羟氯喹对比观察支持用于预防或 COVID-19 早期治疗的一项集群随机对照研究:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jul 31;21(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04527-4.
5
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
6
Convalescent plasma or hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID-19: a rapid review.新冠康复者血浆或超免疫球蛋白用于新冠患者:快速综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 14;5(5):CD013600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013600.
7
Virtualized clinical studies to assess the natural history and impact of gut microbiome modulation in non-hospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 a randomized, open-label, prospective study with a parallel group study evaluating the physiologic effects of KB109 on gut microbiota structure and function: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled study.用于评估非住院轻中度 COVID-19 患者肠道微生物组调节的自然史和影响的虚拟化临床研究:一项随机、开放标签、前瞻性研究,平行组研究评估 KB109 对肠道微生物组结构和功能的生理影响:一项随机对照研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 2;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05157-0.
8
Testing the efficacy and safety of BIO101, for the prevention of respiratory deterioration, in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (COVA study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估 BIO101 预防 COVID-19 肺炎患者呼吸恶化的疗效和安全性(COVA 研究):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 11;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04998-5.
9
Convalescent plasma or hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID-19: a living systematic review.恢复期血浆或高免疫球蛋白用于 COVID-19 患者:一项实时系统评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 20;5(5):CD013600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013600.pub4.
10
Ivermectin for preventing and treating COVID-19.伊维菌素预防和治疗 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):CD015017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015017.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug treatments for mild or moderate covid-19: systematic review and network meta-analysis.轻度或中度新冠肺炎的药物治疗:系统评价与网状Meta分析
BMJ. 2025 May 29;389:e081165. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081165.
2
Composite Interventions on Outcomes of Severely and Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 in Shanghai, China.中国上海针对新型冠状病毒肺炎重症和危重症患者结局的综合干预措施
Microorganisms. 2023 Jul 23;11(7):1859. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11071859.
3
Clinical trials in COVID-19 management & prevention: A meta-epidemiological study examining methodological quality.在 COVID-19 管理和预防方面的临床试验:一项元流行病学研究,考察了方法学质量。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;139:68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.07.002. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
4
Drug treatments for covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis.Covid-19 的药物治疗:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2020 Jul 30;370:m2980. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2980.

本文引用的文献

1
Methodological assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on COVID-19: A meta-epidemiological study.方法学评估系统评价和荟萃分析 COVID-19:一项荟萃流行病学研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;27(5):1123-1133. doi: 10.1111/jep.13578. Epub 2021 May 5.
2
Research response to coronavirus disease 2019 needed better coordination and collaboration: a living mapping of registered trials.研究应对 2019 年冠状病毒病需要更好的协调与合作:注册试验的实时图谱。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;130:107-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
3
The COVID-NMA Project: Building an Evidence Ecosystem for the COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-NMA 项目:为新冠疫情构建证据生态系统。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Dec 15;173(12):1015-1017. doi: 10.7326/M20-5261. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
4
Drug treatments for covid-19: living systematic review and network meta-analysis.Covid-19 的药物治疗:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2020 Jul 30;370:m2980. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2980.
5
A minimal common outcome measure set for COVID-19 clinical research.用于 COVID-19 临床研究的最小通用结局指标集。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;20(8):e192-e197. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30483-7. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
6
Using GRADE in situations of emergencies and urgencies: certainty in evidence and recommendations matters during the COVID-19 pandemic, now more than ever and no matter what.在紧急情况下使用 GRADE:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,现在比以往任何时候都更重要,无论如何,证据和建议的确定性至关重要。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;127:202-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.030. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
7
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.《可信系统评价的更新指南:干预措施系统评价的新版Cochrane手册》
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10(10):ED000142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000142.
8
Patient-important outcomes in systematic reviews: Poor quality of evidence.系统评价中的患者重要结局:证据质量差。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 5;13(4):e0195460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195460. eCollection 2018.
9
Barriers and Benefits to the Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Clinical Care: A Qualitative Study.在常规临床护理中使用患者报告结局指标的障碍与益处:一项定性研究。
Am J Med Qual. 2018 Jul;33(4):359-364. doi: 10.1177/1062860617745986. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
10
Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research.报告元流行病学方法学研究的指南。
Evid Based Med. 2017 Aug;22(4):139-142. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110713. Epub 2017 Jul 12.