Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.
Department of Physical Activity and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Murcia, 30720 Murcia, Spain.
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 5;21(13):4601. doi: 10.3390/s21134601.
Despite being a key sport-specific characteristic in performance, there is no practical tool to assess the quality of the pass in basketball. The aim of this study is to develop a tool (the quality-pass index or Q-Pass) able to deliver a quantitative, practical measure of passing skills quality based on a combination of accuracy, execution time and pass pattern variability. Temporal, kinematics and performance parameters were analysed in five different types of passes (chest, bounce, crossover, between-the-leg and behind-the-back) using a field-based test, video cameras and body-worn inertial sensors (IMUs). Data from pass accuracy, time and angular velocity were collected and processed in a custom-built excel spreadsheet. The Q-pass index (0-100 score) resulted from the sum of the three factors. Data were collected from 16 young basketball players (age: 16 ± 2 years) with high (experienced) and low (novice) level of expertise. Reliability analyses found the Q-pass index as a reliable tool in both novice (CV from 4.3 to 9.3%) and experienced players (CV from 2.8 to 10.2%). Besides, important differences in the Q-pass index were found between players' level ( < 0.05), with the experienced showing better scores in all passing situations: behind-the-back (ES = 1.91), bounce (ES = 0.82), between-the-legs (ES = 1.11), crossover (ES = 0.58) and chest (ES = 0.94). According to these findings, the Q-pass index was sensitive enough to identify the differences in passing skills between young players with different levels of expertise, providing a numbering score for each pass executed.
尽管传球是篮球运动中一个关键的专项特征,但目前还没有实用的工具来评估传球质量。本研究旨在开发一种工具(质量传球指数或 Q-Pass),能够基于准确性、执行时间和传球模式变异性的组合,提供传球技能质量的定量、实用衡量标准。使用基于场地的测试、摄像机和穿戴式惯性传感器(IMU),分析了五种不同类型传球(胸前、反弹、交叉、胯下和背后)的时间、运动学和表现参数。从传球准确性、时间和角速度收集和处理数据,并在定制的 Excel 电子表格中进行处理。Q-pass 指数(0-100 分)是三个因素的总和。数据来自 16 名年轻篮球运动员(年龄:16 ± 2 岁),他们具有高水平(经验丰富)和低水平(新手)的专业技能。可靠性分析发现,Q-pass 指数在新手(CV 从 4.3 到 9.3%)和经验丰富的球员(CV 从 2.8 到 10.2%)中都是可靠的工具。此外,在 Q-pass 指数方面,球员水平之间存在显著差异(<0.05),经验丰富的球员在所有传球情况下的得分都更好:背后传球(ES = 1.91)、反弹传球(ES = 0.82)、胯下传球(ES = 1.11)、交叉传球(ES = 0.58)和胸前传球(ES = 0.94)。根据这些发现,Q-pass 指数足够灵敏,可以识别出不同专业水平的年轻球员之间传球技能的差异,为每次传球执行提供一个编号得分。