• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药师主导的无需皮肤试验或口服激发试验的青霉素过敏标签去除试点项目的有效性和可行性

Effectiveness and Feasibility of Pharmacist-Driven Penicillin Allergy De-Labeling Pilot Program without Skin Testing or Oral Challenges.

作者信息

Song You-Chan, Nelson Zachary J, Wankum Michael A, Gens Krista D

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Mail Route 11321, 800 East 28th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55407, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Jul 20;9(3):127. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9030127.

DOI:10.3390/pharmacy9030127
PMID:34287342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8293328/
Abstract

Documented penicillin allergies have been associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. The goal of this project was to assess the effectiveness and feasibility of a pharmacist-led penicillin allergy "de-labeling" process that does not involve labor-intensive skin testing or direct oral challenges. Adult patients with penicillin allergies were identified and interviewed by an infectious diseases pharmacy resident during a 3-month pilot period. Using an evidence-based standardized checklist, the pharmacist determined if an allergy qualified for de-labeling. In total, 66 patients were interviewed during the pilot period. The average time spent was 5.2 min per patient interviewed. Twelve patients (18%) met the criteria for de-labeling and consented to the removal of the allergy. Four patients (6%) met the criteria but declined removal of the allergy. In brief, 58.3% of patients (7/12) who were de-labeled and 50% of patients (2/4) who declined de-labeling but had their allergy updated to reflect intolerance were subsequently prescribed beta-lactam antibiotics and all (9/9, 100%) were able to tolerate these agents. A pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labeling process utilizing a standardized checklist is an effective and feasible method for removing penicillin allergies in patients without a true allergy.

摘要

有记录表明,青霉素过敏与不良后果风险增加有关。本项目的目标是评估由药剂师主导的青霉素过敏“解除标签”流程的有效性和可行性,该流程不涉及劳动强度大的皮肤试验或直接口服激发试验。在为期3个月的试点期间,由一名传染病药学住院医师识别并采访对青霉素过敏的成年患者。药剂师使用基于证据的标准化检查表来确定过敏是否符合解除标签的条件。在试点期间,总共采访了66名患者。每位患者的平均采访时间为5.2分钟。12名患者(18%)符合解除标签的标准并同意去除过敏记录。4名患者(6%)符合标准但拒绝去除过敏记录。简而言之,解除标签的患者中有58.3%(7/12)以及拒绝解除标签但将过敏记录更新为不耐受的患者中有50%(2/4)随后被开具了β-内酰胺类抗生素,并且所有患者(9/9,100%)都能够耐受这些药物。由药剂师主导、利用标准化检查表的青霉素过敏解除标签流程是一种在没有真正过敏的患者中去除青霉素过敏记录的有效且可行的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a13f/8293328/f6f2b465c47d/pharmacy-09-00127-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a13f/8293328/ae5173a950c2/pharmacy-09-00127-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a13f/8293328/f6f2b465c47d/pharmacy-09-00127-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a13f/8293328/ae5173a950c2/pharmacy-09-00127-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a13f/8293328/f6f2b465c47d/pharmacy-09-00127-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness and Feasibility of Pharmacist-Driven Penicillin Allergy De-Labeling Pilot Program without Skin Testing or Oral Challenges.药师主导的无需皮肤试验或口服激发试验的青霉素过敏标签去除试点项目的有效性和可行性
Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Jul 20;9(3):127. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9030127.
2
Review of Pharmacist Driven Penicillin Allergy Assessments and Skin Testing: A Multi-Center Case-Series.药师主导的青霉素过敏评估与皮肤试验综述:多中心病例系列研究
Hosp Pharm. 2022 Aug;57(4):469-473. doi: 10.1177/00185787211046862. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
3
Implementation of a Pharmacist-Driven Detailed Penicillin Allergy Interview.实施药师主导的详细青霉素过敏访谈。
Ann Pharmacother. 2020 Apr;54(4):364-370. doi: 10.1177/1060028019884874. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
4
Impact of a pharmacist-driven beta-lactam allergy interview on inpatient antimicrobial therapy: A pilot project.药剂师主导的β-内酰胺类药物过敏访谈对住院患者抗菌治疗的影响:一项试点项目。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2016 Nov-Dec;56(6):665-669. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
5
Promoting penicillin allergy de-labeling for children attending a hematology clinic.促进儿科血液科就诊患儿青霉素过敏标识的去除。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2024 Jul;71(7):e31034. doi: 10.1002/pbc.31034. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
6
Evaluation of a pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling ward round: a novel antimicrobial stewardship intervention.评价药师主导的青霉素过敏去标签病房查房:一种新的抗菌药物管理干预措施。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Jun 1;74(6):1725-1730. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz082.
7
Implementation of a Pharmacist-Driven Penicillin and Cephalosporin Allergy Assessment Tool: A Pilot Evaluation.药师主导的青霉素和头孢菌素过敏评估工具的实施:一项试点评估。
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2021;26(7):696-701. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-26.7.696. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
8
Pharmacist-driven penicillin skin testing service for adults prescribed nonpreferred antibiotics in a community hospital.社区医院中药师主导的成人青霉素皮试服务,适用于开处非首选抗生素的情况。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Dec 2;76(24):2060-2069. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz237.
9
Implementation of a pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling service in a public hospital.在一家公立医院实施药师主导的青霉素过敏去标签服务。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 May 1;74(5):1438-1446. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky575.
10
Beta-Lactam Allergy De-labeling in a Pediatric Hospital.儿科医院中的β-内酰胺类过敏去标签化
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Apr;29(2):169-174. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.2.169. Epub 2024 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to delabel low-risk penicillin allergies with consideration for sex and gender.一项关于去除低风险青霉素过敏标签干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析,并考虑了性别因素。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Mar;91(3):684-697. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16366. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
2
Comparing pharmacists versus allergists in low-risk penicillin allergy delabelling: The Hong Kong Penicillin Allergy Pharmacist Initiative (HK-PAPI).低风险青霉素过敏解除标签认定中药剂师与过敏症专科医生的比较:香港青霉素过敏药剂师倡议(HK-PAPI)
World Allergy Organ J. 2024 Nov 21;17(12):101003. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.101003. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The Economics of Penicillin Allergy Testing: Still Scratching the Value Surface.青霉素过敏试验的经济学:仍在触及价值表面。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Mar 15;72(6):939-941. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa195.
2
Acute care beta-lactam allergy pathways: approaches and outcomes.急性护理β-内酰胺类过敏途径:方法与结果
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Jul;123(1):16-34. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
3
Evaluation of a pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling ward round: a novel antimicrobial stewardship intervention.
How to Define and Manage Low-Risk Drug Allergy Labels.
如何定义和管理低风险药物过敏标签。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 May;12(5):1095-1106. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.03.021.
4
Penicillin allergy de-labelling by non-allergists: a comparison of testing protocols.非过敏症专科医生对青霉素过敏标签的去除:检测方案比较
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2023 Dec 19;5(6):dlad134. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad134. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
A new pathway for penicillin delabeling in Norway.挪威青霉素去标记的一条新途径。
World Allergy Organ J. 2023 Oct 16;16(11):100829. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100829. eCollection 2023 Nov.
6
The effectiveness of interventions that support penicillin allergy assessment and delabeling of adult and pediatric patients by nonallergy specialists: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非过敏专科医生支持青霉素过敏评估和重新标记成人和儿科患者的干预措施的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Infect Dis. 2023 Apr;129:152-161. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.11.026. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
评价药师主导的青霉素过敏去标签病房查房:一种新的抗菌药物管理干预措施。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Jun 1;74(6):1725-1730. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz082.
4
Evaluation and Management of Penicillin Allergy: A Review.青霉素过敏的评估与管理:综述
JAMA. 2019 Jan 15;321(2):188-199. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19283.
5
Risk of meticillin resistant and in patients with a documented penicillin allergy: population based matched cohort study.有青霉素过敏史患者罹患耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和 感染的风险:基于人群的匹配队列研究。
BMJ. 2018 Jun 27;361:k2400. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2400.
6
The Impact of a Reported Penicillin Allergy on Surgical Site Infection Risk.报告青霉素过敏对手术部位感染风险的影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 18;66(3):329-336. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix794.
7
The Cost of Self-Reported Penicillin Allergy: A Systematic Review.自述青霉素过敏的代价:系统评价。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Sep-Oct;6(5):1649-1654.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.12.033. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
8
Use of a Penicillin Allergy Screening Algorithm and Penicillin Skin Testing for Transitioning Hospitalized Patients to First-Line Antibiotic Therapy.使用青霉素过敏筛查算法和青霉素皮试,将住院患者过渡到一线抗生素治疗。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Jul-Aug;6(4):1349-1355. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
9
Cross-reactivity in β-Lactam Allergy.β-内酰胺类过敏的交叉反应性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Jan-Feb;6(1):72-81.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.08.027. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
10
The Cost of Penicillin Allergy Evaluation.青霉素过敏评估的成本。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 May-Jun;6(3):1019-1027.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Sep 22.