Di Bello V, Santoro G, Cini G, Pentimone F, Ginanni A, Romano M F, Giusti C
Istituto di Clinica Medica II, Università di Pisa.
Int J Sports Med. 1987 Dec;8(6):407-14. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1025695.
Two groups of subjects were examined: trained athletes (group A) and a sedentary control group (group B). The subjects performed submaximal bicycle exercise in the semisupine position to evaluate the differences between the two groups with regard to cardiovascular response during exercise and recovery and to point out all the changes due to training. During the first part of exercise, cardiac output increased contemporary with heart rate and myocardial contractility as shown by the trend of the ejection fraction, higher in group A, under the same level of total vascular peripheral resistances. Later there was an increase of cardiac output for a further increase of heart rate and cardiac inotropism due to the homeometric mechanism. During recovery the heart rate and peripheral vascular resistance reduction led to an increase of venous return which set up the Frank-Starling mechanism via an increase of left ventricular dimensions. These adjustments were more efficient in group A. During exercise and recovery the heart rate-pressure product was constantly lower in group A with a significant difference to group B. Therefore, trained athletes' myocardium is more efficient than that of the sedentary group because it performs an external work load with a lower oxygen consumption.
受过训练的运动员(A组)和久坐不动的对照组(B组)。受试者在半仰卧位进行次极量自行车运动,以评估两组在运动和恢复过程中心血管反应的差异,并指出训练引起的所有变化。在运动的第一阶段,心输出量随着心率和心肌收缩力的增加而同时增加,如射血分数的趋势所示,在相同的总外周血管阻力水平下,A组的射血分数更高。随后,由于等长调节机制,心率进一步增加和心肌收缩性增强,导致心输出量增加。在恢复过程中,心率和外周血管阻力降低导致静脉回流量增加,通过增加左心室尺寸建立了Frank-Starling机制。这些调节在A组中更有效。在运动和恢复过程中,A组的心率-压力乘积始终低于B组,且与B组有显著差异。因此,受过训练的运动员的心肌比久坐组更有效,因为它以较低的氧消耗执行外部工作负荷。