Bameshki Alireza, Khayat Kashani Hamid Reza, Razavi Majid, Shobeiry Maryam, Taghavi Gilani Mehryar
Lung Disease Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Department of Neurosurgery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2021 Jun 19;35:79. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.35.79. eCollection 2021.
High tidal volume leads to inflammation, and low tidal volume leads to atelectasia and hypoxemia. This study was conducted to compare the effect of 6 mL/kg with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and 8 mL/kg without PEEP on pulmonary shunt and dead space volume. This clinical trial was done on 36 patients aged 20 to 65 years old with ASA I-II. They were candidates for upper abdominal surgery and divided randomly into 2 groups. One group were ventilated with the tidal volume = 8 mL/kg without PEEP (TV8). The other group received the tidal volume = 6 mL/kg with low PEEP = 5 cm H2O (TV6). Arterial and central venous blood gases were taken after intubation and 2 hours later. Additionally, the vital signs of the patients were checked every 30 minutes. Data analysis was performed using t test, chi-square test, and repeated measures analysis of variance with SPSS software, version 16 (SPSS Inc). P value less than.05 were meaningful. There was no significant difference on the preanesthesia parameters. The pulmonary shunt was 13.5±0.1% and 18.6±0.2% in the groups TV6 and TV8, respectively (p=0.132), which slightly decreased after 2 hours in both groups without any significant difference (p=0.284). Prior to the ventilation, the ratios of dead space to tidal volume were 0.25±0.2 and 0.14±0.1 in the TV6 and TV8 groups, respectively (p=0.163), and after 2 hours, they were 0.23±0.11 and 0.16±0.1 in the TV6 and TV8 groups, respectively (p=0.271). There was no significant difference between the groups for blood pressure and peripheral and arterial oxygenation changes. The tidal volume of 6 mL/kg with the PEEP of 5 mmHg was similar to the tidal volume of 8 mL/kg without PEEP for hemodynamic and pulmonary changes (oxygenation, shunt, and dead space).
高潮气量会导致炎症,低潮气量会导致肺不张和低氧血症。本研究旨在比较6 mL/kg加呼气末正压(PEEP)与8 mL/kg不加PEEP对肺分流和死腔容积的影响。这项临床试验针对36例年龄在20至65岁、ASA分级为I-II级的患者进行。他们均为上腹部手术的候选者,并被随机分为两组。一组采用潮气量 = 8 mL/kg且不加PEEP进行通气(TV8)。另一组接受潮气量 = 6 mL/kg且低PEEP = 5 cm H2O进行通气(TV6)。插管后及2小时后采集动脉和中心静脉血气。此外,每30分钟检查一次患者的生命体征。使用SPSS 16版软件(SPSS公司)进行t检验、卡方检验和重复测量方差分析。P值小于0.05具有统计学意义。麻醉前参数无显著差异。TV6组和TV8组的肺分流分别为13.5±0.1%和18.6±0.2%(p = 0.132),两组在2小时后均略有下降,但无显著差异(p = 0.284)。通气前,TV6组和TV8组的死腔与潮气量之比分别为0.25±0.2和0.14±0.1(p = 0.163),2小时后,TV6组和TV8组分别为0.23±0.11和0.16±0.1(p = 0.271)。两组在血压以及外周和动脉氧合变化方面无显著差异。对于血流动力学和肺部变化(氧合、分流和死腔),5 mmHg PEEP的6 mL/kg潮气量与不加PEEP的8 mL/kg潮气量相似。