Neves Ana Luísa, Li Edmond, Serafini Alice, Jimenez Geronimo, Lingner Heidrun, Koskela Tuomas H, Hoffman Robert D, Collins Claire, Petek Davorina, Claveria Ana, Tsopra Rosy, Irving Greg, Gusso Gustavo, O'Neill Braden Gregory, Hoedebecke Kyle, Espitia Sandra Milena, Ungan Mehmet, Nessler Katarzyna, Lazic Vanja, Laranjo Liliana, Memarian Ensieh, Fernandez Maria Jose, Ghafur Saira, Fontana Gianluca, Majeed Azeem, Car Josip, Darzi Ara
Institute of Global Health Innovation, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Local Health Authority of Modena, Modena, Italy.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Aug 26;10(8):e30099. doi: 10.2196/30099.
In recent decades, virtual care has emerged as a promising option to support primary care delivery. However, despite the potential, adoption rates remained low. With the outbreak of COVID-19, it has suddenly been pushed to the forefront of care delivery. As we progress into the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a need and opportunity to review the impact remote care had in primary care settings and reassess its potential future role.
This study aims to explore the perspectives of general practitioners (GPs) and family doctors on the (1) use of virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic, (2) perceived impact on quality and safety of care, and (3) essential factors for high-quality and sustainable use of virtual care in the future.
This study used an online cross-sectional questionnaire completed by GPs distributed across 20 countries. The survey was hosted in Qualtrics and distributed using email, social media, and the researchers' personal contact networks. GPs were eligible for the survey if they were working mainly in primary care during the period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Descriptive statistical analysis will be performed for quantitative variables, and relationships between the use of virtual care and perceptions on impact on quality and safety of care and participants' characteristics may be explored. Qualitative data (free-text responses) will be analyzed using framework analysis.
Data collection took place from June 2020 to September 2020. As of this manuscript's submission, a total of 1605 GP respondents participated in the questionnaire. Further data analysis is currently ongoing.
The study will provide a comprehensive overview of the availability of virtual care technologies, perceived impact on quality and safety of care, and essential factors for high-quality future use. In addition, a description of the underlying factors that influence this adoption and perceptions, in both individual GP and family doctor characteristics and the context in which they work, will be provided. While the COVID-19 pandemic may prove the first great stress test of the capabilities, capacity, and robustness of digital systems currently in use, remote care will likely remain an increasingly common approach in the future. There is an imperative to identify the main lessons from this unexpected transformation and use them to inform policy decisions and health service design.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/30099.
近几十年来,虚拟医疗已成为支持初级医疗服务的一个有前景的选择。然而,尽管有潜力,但采用率仍然很低。随着新冠疫情的爆发,它突然被推到了医疗服务的前沿。在我们进入新冠疫情大流行的第二年之际,有必要且有机会审视远程医疗在初级医疗环境中的影响,并重新评估其未来的潜在作用。
本研究旨在探讨全科医生(GPs)和家庭医生对以下方面的看法:(1)新冠疫情期间虚拟医疗的使用情况;(2)对医疗质量和安全的感知影响;(3)未来高质量和可持续使用虚拟医疗的关键因素。
本研究采用在线横断面问卷调查,由分布在20个国家的全科医生完成。该调查在Qualtrics平台上进行,通过电子邮件、社交媒体和研究人员的个人联系网络进行分发。如果全科医生在新冠疫情期间主要从事初级医疗工作,则有资格参与该调查。将对定量变量进行描述性统计分析,并探讨虚拟医疗的使用与对医疗质量和安全的影响感知以及参与者特征之间的关系。定性数据(自由文本回复)将使用框架分析法进行分析。
数据收集于2020年6月至2020年9月进行。截至本稿件提交时,共有1605名全科医生受访者参与了问卷调查。目前正在进行进一步的数据分析。
该研究将全面概述虚拟医疗技术的可用性、对医疗质量和安全的感知影响以及未来高质量使用的关键因素。此外,还将描述影响这种采用和认知的潜在因素,包括个体全科医生和家庭医生的特征以及他们工作的环境。虽然新冠疫情可能是对当前使用的数字系统的能力、容量和稳健性的首次重大压力测试,但远程医疗在未来可能仍将是一种越来越普遍的方式。必须从这一意外转变中吸取主要经验教训,并将其用于为政策决策和卫生服务设计提供信息。
国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/30099