Köhne Annemarie C J, Isvoranu Adela-Maria
Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 6;12:680805. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.680805. eCollection 2021.
The comorbidity of personality disorders and mental disorders is commonly understood through three types of theoretical models: either a) personality disorders precede mental disorders, b) mental disorders precede personality disorders, c) mental disorders and personality disorders share common etiological grounds. Although these hypotheses differ with respect to their idea of causal direction, they all imply a latent variable perspective, in which it is assumed that either personality and mental disorders are latent variables that have certain causal relations [models a) and b)]; or that, as in model c), the common etiology is in fact a latent variable that causes symptomatology of both personality and mental disorders. We aim to provide another perspective on the comorbidity between personality and mental disorders, namely a network perspective. To this end, we investigated Major Depression (MD) and Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and hypothesized that symptoms of BPD and MD could interact with one another rather than being caused by a latent variable (e.g., identity diffusion → unstable relationships → depressed mood). To illustrate this theoretical network conceptualization of the comorbidity of BPD and MD we analyzed a cross-sectional clinical dataset of 376 patients who were asked to complete the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Disorders and the Beck Depression Inventory II. The results identify direct associations between symptoms of MD and BPD. If we take the links in this empirical network to be 'substantive', this suggests a radical shift of our current conceptualization of the comorbidity of mental disorders and personality disorders.
即 a) 人格障碍先于精神障碍出现;b) 精神障碍先于人格障碍出现;c) 精神障碍和人格障碍具有共同的病因基础。尽管这些假设在因果方向的观点上有所不同,但它们都暗含一种潜在变量视角,即要么认为人格和精神障碍是具有特定因果关系的潜在变量 [模型 a) 和 b)];要么像在模型 c) 中那样,共同病因实际上是一个导致人格和精神障碍症状的潜在变量。我们旨在为人格与精神障碍的共病现象提供另一种视角,即网络视角。为此,我们对重度抑郁症(MD)和边缘型人格障碍(BPD)进行了研究,并假设 BPD 和 MD 的症状可能相互作用,而非由一个潜在变量导致(例如,身份认同扩散→人际关系不稳定→情绪低落)。为了说明 BPD 和 MD 共病的这种理论网络概念,我们分析了一个包含 376 名患者 的横断面临床数据集,这些患者被要求完成《精神障碍诊断与统计手册第四版》轴 II 障碍的结构化临床访谈和贝克抑郁量表第二版。结果确定了 MD 和 BPD 症状之间的直接关联。如果我们将这个实证网络中的联系视为“实质性的”,这意味着我们目前对精神障碍和人格障碍共病的概念化有了根本性的转变。