Ouyang Weiming, Xie Tao, Fang Hui, Gao Chunling, Stantchev Tzanko, Clouse Kathleen A, Yuan Kun, Ju Tongzhong, Frucht David M
Division of Biotechnology Review and Research II, Office of Biotechnology Products, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.
Division of Biotechnology Review and Research I, Office of Biotechnology Products, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jul 14;22(14):7540. doi: 10.3390/ijms22147540.
Proinflammatory cytokine production following infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2) is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Like SARS CoV-1, SARS CoV-2 enters host cells via its spike protein, which attaches to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). As SARS CoV-1 spike protein is reported to induce cytokine production, we hypothesized that this pathway could be a shared mechanism underlying pathogenic immune responses. We herein compared the capabilities of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), SARS CoV-1 and SARS CoV-2 spike proteins to induce cytokine expression in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). We observed that only specific commercial lots of SARS CoV-2 induce cytokine production. Surprisingly, recombinant SARS CoV-2 spike proteins from different vendors and batches exhibited different patterns of cytokine induction, and these activities were not inhibited by blockade of spike protein-ACE2 binding using either soluble ACE2 or neutralizing anti-S1 antibody. Moreover, commercial spike protein reagents contained varying levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which correlated directly with their abilities to induce cytokine production. The LPS inhibitor, polymyxin B, blocked this cytokine induction activity. In addition, SARS CoV-2 spike protein avidly bound soluble LPS in vitro, rendering it a cytokine inducer. These results not only suggest caution in monitoring the purity of SARS CoV-2 spike protein reagents, but they indicate the possibility that interactions of SARS CoV-2 spike protein with LPS from commensal bacteria in virally infected mucosal tissues could promote pathogenic inflammatory cytokine production.
感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)后促炎细胞因子的产生与不良临床结果相关。与SARS-CoV-1一样,SARS-CoV-2通过其刺突蛋白进入宿主细胞,该蛋白与血管紧张素转换酶2(ACE2)结合。由于据报道SARS-CoV-1刺突蛋白可诱导细胞因子产生,我们推测该途径可能是致病性免疫反应的共同机制。我们在此比较了中东呼吸综合征(MERS)、SARS-CoV-1和SARS-CoV-2刺突蛋白在人外周血单个核细胞(PBMC)中诱导细胞因子表达的能力。我们观察到只有特定商业批次的SARS-CoV-2可诱导细胞因子产生。令人惊讶的是,来自不同供应商和批次的重组SARS-CoV-2刺突蛋白表现出不同的细胞因子诱导模式,并且这些活性不会被使用可溶性ACE2或中和抗S1抗体阻断刺突蛋白与ACE2的结合所抑制。此外,商业刺突蛋白试剂含有不同水平的脂多糖(LPS),这与其诱导细胞因子产生的能力直接相关。LPS抑制剂多粘菌素B可阻断这种细胞因子诱导活性。此外,SARS-CoV-2刺突蛋白在体外能 avidly结合可溶性LPS,使其成为一种细胞因子诱导剂。这些结果不仅提示在监测SARS-CoV-2刺突蛋白试剂纯度时要谨慎,而且表明SARS-CoV-2刺突蛋白与病毒感染的粘膜组织中共生细菌的LPS相互作用可能促进致病性炎性细胞因子产生的可能性。 (注:avidly未找到合适中文释义,保留英文)