Suppr超能文献

PRF 与同种异体骨用于牙槽窝保存的组织形态计量学结果比较研究——随机对照试验。

Comparison Study of the Histomorphometric Results after Socket Preservation with PRF and Allograft Used for Socket Preservation-Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Oral Surgery Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

Center of Dental Implantology Research Institute, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 13;18(14):7451. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147451.

Abstract

The aim of the present clinical study was to assess and compare the histomorphometric results and efficacy of freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) in combination with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), and PRF as a sole grafting material for socket preservation. Ninety patients in need of tooth extraction and implant restoration were included in this study. The participants were randomly divided into three groups based on post-extraction clinical protocol: socket preservation procedure with allograft in combination with a PRF membrane (PRFm), PRF as a sole grafting material, and a control group. A total of 90 implants were placed four months post-extraction. During the surgical re-entry a bone biopsy was harvested with a trephine drill. Histological samples were prepared and analyzed for percentage vital bone and connective tissue. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc analysis were used to assess the results. Both test groups revealed a significantly higher percentage of vital bone formation compared to the control group. No statistically significant differences regarding vital bone formation and connective tissue quantity between the tested groups were observed (FDBA + PRFm: 3.29 ± 13.03%; and PRF: 60.79 ± 9.72%). From a clinical and histological point of view, both materials in the test groups are suitable for the filling of post-extraction sockets without bone defects. Both of the tested groups revealed a significantly higher percentage of vital bone formation compared to the control group.

摘要

本临床研究的目的是评估和比较冻干骨移植物(FDBA)与富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)联合应用以及 PRF 作为单独植骨材料在牙槽窝保存中的组织形态计量学结果和疗效。本研究纳入了 90 名需要拔牙和植入修复的患者。根据拔牙后临床方案,将参与者随机分为三组:异体骨联合 PRF 膜(PRFm)的牙槽窝保存术、PRF 作为单独植骨材料组和对照组。拔牙后四个月共植入 90 个种植体。在再次手术中,使用环钻采集骨活检。制备组织学样本并分析活骨和结缔组织的百分比。采用单因素方差分析和 Bonferroni 事后检验分析结果。与对照组相比,两个实验组的活骨形成百分比均显著更高。两组的活骨形成和结缔组织量之间没有统计学上的显著差异(FDBA+PRFm:3.29±13.03%;PRF:60.79±9.72%)。从临床和组织学角度来看,实验组中的两种材料都适合无骨缺损的拔牙后牙槽窝填充。与对照组相比,两个实验组的活骨形成百分比均显著更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3088/8306316/2506bcb489c3/ijerph-18-07451-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验