Van Belle D, Couplet I, Prevost M, Wodak S J
Unité de Conformation des Macromolécules, Biologiques Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.
J Mol Biol. 1987 Dec 20;198(4):721-35. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90213-0.
The calculation of induced dipole moments and of their contribution to electrostatic effects in proteins is implemented following the approach of Warshel. Isotropic polarizabilities are assigned to individual atoms, and the resulting deviation from pairwise interactions is treated by a self-consistent iterative procedure. We give a detailed description of how the formalism is implemented in molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulation procedures, and report results based on calculations performed on crystal structures of crambin, liver alcohol dehydrogenase and ribonuclease T1. We focus our analysis on evaluating the contribution of polarizability of the protein matrix to electrostatic energies, local fields, to dipole moments of peptide groups and of secondary structure elements in the polypeptide chain. Our calculations confirm that induced dipole moments in proteins provide important stabilizing contributions to electrostatic energies, and that these contributions cannot be mimicked by the usual approximations where either a continuum dielectric constant, or a distance-dependent dielectric function is used. We find that induced protein dipoles appreciably affect the magnitude and direction of local electrostatic fields in a manner that is strongly influenced by the microscopic environment in the protein. Most strongly affected are fields in charged groups that are involved in close interactions with other charged groups, while the influence on local fields of aliphatic groups is marginal. We find, moreover, that induction effects from surrounding protein atoms tend on average to increase peptide dipoles and helix macro-dipoles by about 16%, again reflecting electrostatic stabilization by the protein matrix, and show that (at least in the alpha/beta domain of alcohol dehydrogenase) the contribution of side-chains to this stabilization is significant.
按照Warshel的方法计算诱导偶极矩及其对蛋白质静电效应的贡献。各向同性极化率被赋予单个原子,由此产生的与成对相互作用的偏差通过自洽迭代程序处理。我们详细描述了该形式体系在分子力学和分子动力学模拟程序中的实现方式,并报告了基于对胰凝乳蛋白酶、肝醇脱氢酶和核糖核酸酶T1晶体结构进行计算的结果。我们将分析重点放在评估蛋白质基质极化率对静电能、局部场、肽基团偶极矩以及多肽链二级结构单元偶极矩的贡献上。我们的计算证实,蛋白质中的诱导偶极矩对静电能提供了重要的稳定贡献,而且这些贡献无法通过使用连续介质介电常数或距离相关介电函数的常用近似方法来模拟。我们发现,诱导的蛋白质偶极以一种受蛋白质微观环境强烈影响的方式,显著影响局部静电场的大小和方向。受影响最强烈的是与其他带电基团紧密相互作用的带电基团中的场,而对脂肪族基团局部场的影响则微乎其微。此外,我们发现周围蛋白质原子的诱导效应平均倾向于使肽偶极和螺旋大偶极增加约16%,这再次反映了蛋白质基质的静电稳定作用,并表明(至少在醇脱氢酶的α/β结构域中)侧链对这种稳定作用的贡献是显著的。