Beck Jimikaye, Jensen Lisa H, Hill James O
University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Anschutz Health and Wellness Center, Aurora, CO.
Community-Campus Partnership, Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.
Health Behav Policy Rev. 2015 Sep;2(5):388-400. doi: 10.14485/hbpr.2.5.7. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
The primary purpose of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators of Fuel Up to Play 60 (FUTP60) program implementation.
This was an observational study occurring over 20 months in 4 schools in metropolitan Denver, Colorado. Key informant interviews and FUTP60 surveys examined the barriers and facilitators of program implementation and utilization of other health-promotion programs.
Program advisors stated that the adaptability of FUTP60 eased program implementation in schools, helped schools to meet wellness policy goals, and that the program message resonated with students.
FUTP60's adaptability to a school's needs, its simple messaging and student-centric model were major facilitators of program implementation and should be considered when implementing other school-based programs.
本研究的主要目的是确定“加油玩60分钟”(FUTP60)项目实施的障碍和促进因素。
这是一项在科罗拉多州丹佛市大都会区的4所学校进行的为期20个月的观察性研究。关键信息人访谈和FUTP60调查考察了项目实施的障碍以及其他健康促进项目的利用情况。
项目顾问表示,FUTP60的适应性使该项目在学校的实施更加顺利,有助于学校实现健康政策目标,并且该项目传达的信息能引起学生共鸣。
FUTP60对学校需求的适应性、简单的信息传达以及以学生为中心的模式是项目实施的主要促进因素,在实施其他校本项目时应予以考虑。