• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

题库:信用?还是负债?对医学生使用题库的定性探索。

Question banks: credit? Or debit? A qualitative exploration of their use among medical students.

机构信息

Newcastle University School of Medicine, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 24;24(1):569. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05517-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-05517-9
PMID:38790034
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11127331/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Online question banks are the most widely used education resource amongst medical students. Despite this there is an absence of literature outlining how and why they are used by students. Drawing on Deci and Ryan's self-determination theory, our study aimed to explore why and how early-stage medical students use question banks in their learning and revision strategies.

METHODS

The study was conducted at Newcastle University Medical School (United Kingdom and Malaysia). Purposive, convenience and snowball sampling of year two students were employed. Ten interviews were conducted. Thematic analysis was undertaken iteratively, enabling exploration of nascent themes. Data collection ceased when no new perspectives were identified.

RESULTS

Students' motivation to use question banks was predominantly driven by extrinsic motivators, with high-stakes exams and fear of failure being central. Their convenience and perceived efficiency promoted autonomy and thus motivation. Rapid feedback cycles and design features consistent with gamification were deterrents to intrinsic motivation. Potentially detrimental patterns of question bank use were evident: cueing, avoidance and memorising. Scepticism regarding veracity of question bank content was absent.

CONCLUSIONS

We call on educators to provide students with guidance about potential pitfalls associated with question banks and to reflect on potential inequity of access to these resources.

摘要

背景

在线题库是医学生最常用的教育资源。尽管如此,却缺乏文献来阐述学生是如何以及为何使用它们。本研究以 Deci 和 Ryan 的自我决定理论为基础,旨在探讨医学生在学习和复习策略中使用题库的原因和方式。

方法

该研究在纽卡斯尔大学医学院(英国和马来西亚)进行。采用有目的、便利和滚雪球抽样方法选取二年级学生。进行了 10 次访谈。采用迭代主题分析方法,探索新出现的主题。当没有新的观点时,数据收集就停止了。

结果

学生使用题库的动机主要是受外部动机驱动,高风险考试和对失败的恐惧是核心因素。题库的便利性和效率感知促进了自主性,从而激发了动机。快速反馈循环和与游戏化一致的设计特点则阻碍了内在动机。可能存在不利于题库使用的模式:提示、回避和死记硬背。学生对题库内容真实性的怀疑并不存在。

结论

我们呼吁教育者为学生提供有关题库相关潜在陷阱的指导,并反思获取这些资源的潜在不公平性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dbd/11127331/a222246e5c96/12909_2024_5517_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dbd/11127331/a222246e5c96/12909_2024_5517_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dbd/11127331/a222246e5c96/12909_2024_5517_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Question banks: credit? Or debit? A qualitative exploration of their use among medical students.题库:信用?还是负债?对医学生使用题库的定性探索。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 24;24(1):569. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05517-9.
2
Medical students: what educational resources are they using?医学生:他们在使用哪些教育资源?
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 25;19(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1462-9.
3
Why are medical students so motivated to learn ultrasound skills? A qualitative study.医学生为何如此热衷于学习超声技能?一项定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 26;24(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05420-3.
4
A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.一种由学生主导的新颖方法,用于生成多项选择题并创建在线数据库,同时有针对性地征求临床医生的意见。
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(2):182-8. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1011651.
5
Perceived enablers and constraints of motivation to conduct undergraduate research in a Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences: What role does choice play?医学与健康科学学院本科生开展研究的动机的感知促进因素和制约因素:选择扮演什么角色?
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 13;14(3):e0212873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212873. eCollection 2019.
6
Promoting positive perceptions of and motivation for research among undergraduate medical students to stimulate future research involvement: a grounded theory study.促进医学生对研究的积极认知和动机,以激发未来的研究参与:扎根理论研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jun 26;20(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02112-6.
7
Formative student-authored question bank: perceptions, question quality and association with summative performance.形成性学生自主命题题库:认知、问题质量与总结性表现的关联。
Postgrad Med J. 2018 Feb;94(1108):97-103. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2017-135018. Epub 2017 Sep 2.
8
Medical students’ pattern of self-directed learning prior to and during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic period and its implications for Free Open Access Meducation within the United Kingdom.新冠疫情大流行前后医学生的自主学习模式及其对英国开放获取医学教育的启示。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:5. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.5. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
9
Levelling the playing field: students' motivations to contribute to an amnesty of assessment materials.拉平起跑线:学生对评估材料特赦做出贡献的动机。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02320-0.
10
The sudden transition to synchronized online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study exploring medical students' perspectives.沙特阿拉伯在 COVID-19 大流行期间突然转向同步在线学习:一项探索医学生观点的定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Aug 28;20(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02208-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Pay to win? Exploring medical students' use of, and access to, paid commercial educational resources.付费才能赢?探索医学生对付费商业教育资源的使用及获取情况。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 21;25(1):738. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07233-4.
2
Integrating Higher-Order Multiple-Choice Questions into Medical Education: How Best to Support Students for Change?将高阶多项选择题融入医学教育:如何最好地支持学生做出改变?
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Sep 9;35(1):587-588. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02164-z. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Application of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content in Medical Examinations.

本文引用的文献

1
ChatGPT for assessment writing.ChatGPT 用于评估写作。
Med Teach. 2023 Nov;45(11):1224-1227. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2249239. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
2
When Practice Questions Become Real Life.当练习题变成现实生活时。
JAMA. 2022 Aug 23;328(8):711. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.13837.
3
Benefits of gamification in medical education.游戏化在医学教育中的益处。
人工智能生成内容在医学检查中的应用。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 Feb 25;16:331-339. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S492895. eCollection 2025.
Clin Anat. 2022 Sep;35(6):795-807. doi: 10.1002/ca.23916. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
4
Insights into Delivering Cross-Cultural Medical Education in the UK and Malaysia.关于在英国和马来西亚开展跨文化医学教育的见解。
Med Sci Educ. 2021 Sep 16;31(6):2177-2188. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01382-z. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
Answering questions in a co-created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise.在共同创建的形成性考试题库中回答问题可以提高总结性考试成绩,而学生从回答、创作和同伴讨论中受益:PeerWise 的混合方法分析。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2021 Aug;9(4):e00833. doi: 10.1002/prp2.833.
6
Patients don't come with multiple choice options: essay-based assessment in UME.医学生学业评估中的论述题考试:患者没有多项选择。
Med Educ Online. 2019 Dec;24(1):1649959. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1649959.
7
Medical students: what educational resources are they using?医学生:他们在使用哪些教育资源?
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 25;19(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1462-9.
8
Test-enhanced learning in health professions education: A systematic review: BEME Guide No. 48.医学专业学术文献翻译:促进健康职业教育中的测试增强型学习:系统评价:BEME 指南第 48 号。
Med Teach. 2018 Apr;40(4):337-350. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1430354. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
9
Class-Wide Access to a Commercial Step 1 Question Bank During Preclinical Organ-Based Modules: A Pilot Project.临床前器官模块中对商业 Step 1 题库的全班访问:一个试点项目。
Acad Med. 2018 Mar;93(3):486-490. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001861.
10
Association of Intrinsic Motivating Factors and Markers of Physician Well-Being: A National Physician Survey.内在激励因素与医生幸福感指标的关联:一项全国性医生调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jul;32(7):739-746. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-3997-y. Epub 2017 Feb 6.