Department of Cardiology, Tsinghua University, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China.
Peking University, Clinical Research Institute, Beijing, China.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2021 Sep;26(5):e12880. doi: 10.1111/anec.12880. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
Several ECG criteria have been widely used for diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in clinical practice. However, their performance in a general Chinese population is limited.
A multi-stage, stratified cluster sampling across China was performed and 7415 representative Chinese adults aged 18-85 years were analyzed. ECG was collected by using GE MAC 5500 machine. The association between five ECG-LVH criteria (i.e., Peguero-Lo Presti, Cornell, Cornell product, Sokolow-Lyon and Sokolow-Lyon product) and echocardiographic LVH (Echo-LVH) was assessed by Pearson's correlation, diagnostic statistics like predictive values, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. We found that the prevalence of the Echo-LVH was 11% while ECG-LVH ranged from 3% to 27%. All ECG-LVH criteria had high negative predictive value (NPV) (89%) and specificity (73-96%) but low positive predictive value (PPV) (12-24%) and sensitivity (4-29%). The newly Peguero-Lo Presti criteria had higher sensitivity (29%) but lower specificity (73%) and accuracy (68%) compared with other criteria. Cornell product had the best diagnostic performance (AUC: 0.59), as well as the highest specificity (96%) and accuracy (86%) but lowest sensitivity (4%). Among single-lead components of ECG criteria, R voltage and QRS duration performed relatively better than others. Hypertensive and older individuals had higher sensitivity but lower specificity and accuracy than their counterparts.
ECG-LVH criteria had high NPV to detect Echo-LVH. Though with higher sensitivity, Peguero-Lo Presti criteria did not have better diagnostic performance to detect Echo-LVH. R and QRS duration had stronger association with Echo-LVH among all single-lead components.
临床上有几种心电图标准被广泛用于诊断左心室肥厚(LVH)。然而,它们在中国普通人群中的表现有限。
在中国进行了多阶段、分层聚类抽样,分析了 7415 名年龄在 18-85 岁的代表性中国成年人。使用 GE MAC 5500 机器采集心电图。通过 Pearson 相关分析评估了五种心电图-LVH 标准(即 Peguero-Lo Presti、Cornell、Cornell 乘积、Sokolow-Lyon 和 Sokolow-Lyon 乘积)与超声心动图-LVH(Echo-LVH)之间的关系,还评估了预测值等诊断统计数据和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。我们发现 Echo-LVH 的患病率为 11%,而 ECG-LVH 的范围为 3%至 27%。所有 ECG-LVH 标准均具有较高的阴性预测值(NPV)(89%)和特异性(73%-96%),但阳性预测值(PPV)(12%-24%)和敏感性(4%-29%)较低。与其他标准相比,新的 Peguero-Lo Presti 标准具有更高的敏感性(29%),但特异性(73%)和准确性(68%)较低。Cornell 乘积具有最佳的诊断性能(AUC:0.59),以及最高的特异性(96%)和准确性(86%),但敏感性最低(4%)。在心电图标准的单导联成分中,R 波电压和 QRS 持续时间的表现相对较好。高血压和老年患者的敏感性较高,但特异性和准确性较低。
ECG-LVH 标准对检测 Echo-LVH 具有较高的 NPV。虽然 Peguero-Lo Presti 标准的敏感性较高,但在检测 Echo-LVH 方面并未具有更好的诊断性能。在所有单导联成分中,R 波和 QRS 持续时间与 Echo-LVH 具有更强的关联。