Suppr超能文献

西班牙实验室啮齿动物研究:福利与健康状况调查

Working with laboratory rodents in Spain: a survey on welfare and wellbeing.

作者信息

Goñi-Balentziaga Olatz, Ortega-Saez Iván, Vila Sergi, Azkona Garikoitz

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU), Donostia, Spain.

Scientific and Technological Centers (CCIT), University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Lab Anim Res. 2021 Jul 27;37(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s42826-021-00098-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Replacement, reduction and refinement, the 3R principles, provide a framework to minimize the use and suffering of animals in science. In this context, we aimed to determine the actual perception that individuals working with laboratory rodents in biomedical research have on animal welfare and on their interaction with the animals, as well as how they perceive its impact on their social relations. To this end, we designed an anonymous on-line survey for people working with rodents, at three responsibility levels, in Spain.

RESULTS

Of the 356 participants, 239 were women (67 %); 263 were researchers (74 %), and 93 animal facility staff (26 %), of which 55 were caretakers/technicians (15 %), and 38 welfare officer/veterinarians (11 %). Animal facility staff indicated environmental enrichment to be a universal practice. About half of the participants reported that, in their opinion, animals suffer "little to none" or "minor" stress and pain. Animal caretakers/technicians and researchers perceived higher levels of stress and pain than welfare officers/veterinarians. Participants judged decapitation the most unpleasant method to kill rodents, whereas anaesthetic overdose was the least one. A sizable proportion - 21 % of animal caretakers/technicians and 11.4 % of researchers - stated that they were never given the choice not to euthanize the rodents they work with. Overall, women reported higher interactions with animals than men. Nevertheless, we could detect a significant correlation between time spent with the animals and interaction scores. Notably, 80 % of animal facility staff and 92 % of researchers rarely talked about their work with laboratory rodents with people outside their inner social circle.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the participants showed high awareness and sensitivity to rodent wellbeing; animal facility staff reported a similar perception on welfare questions, independently of their category, while researchers, who spent less time with the animals, showed less awareness and manifested lower human-animal interaction and less social support. Regarding the perception on social acceptance of laboratory animal work, all groups were cautious and rarely talked about their job, suggesting that it is considered a sensitive issue in Spain.

摘要

背景

替代、减少和优化这3R原则为尽量减少科学研究中动物的使用和痛苦提供了一个框架。在此背景下,我们旨在确定生物医学研究中从事实验啮齿动物工作的人员对动物福利及其与动物互动的实际看法,以及他们如何看待这对其社会关系的影响。为此,我们为西班牙三个责任级别的从事啮齿动物工作的人员设计了一项匿名在线调查。

结果

在356名参与者中,239名是女性(67%);263名是研究人员(74%),93名是动物设施工作人员(26%),其中55名是饲养员/技术员(15%),38名是福利官/兽医(11%)。动物设施工作人员表示环境丰富化是一种普遍做法。约一半的参与者报告称,在他们看来,动物遭受的“压力和痛苦很小或没有”或“轻微”。动物饲养员/技术员和研究人员比福利官/兽医感受到更高程度的压力和痛苦。参与者认为断头是最令人不快的杀死啮齿动物的方法,而过量麻醉是最不令人不快的方法。相当一部分——21%的动物饲养员/技术员和11.4%的研究人员——表示他们从未有过不实施他们所负责的啮齿动物安乐死的选择。总体而言,女性报告与动物的互动比男性更多。然而,我们可以检测到与动物相处的时间和互动得分之间存在显著相关性。值得注意的是,80%的动物设施工作人员和92%的研究人员很少与他们内部社交圈子以外的人谈论他们与实验啮齿动物的工作。

结论

总体而言,参与者对啮齿动物的福祉表现出高度的认识和敏感性;动物设施工作人员对福利问题的看法相似,与他们的类别无关,而与动物相处时间较少的研究人员表现出较低的认识,表现出较低的人与动物互动和较少的社会支持。关于对实验动物工作社会接受度的看法,所有群体都很谨慎,很少谈论他们的工作,这表明在西班牙这被视为一个敏感问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75b6/8314439/715d6b2dfa52/42826_2021_98_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验