Murongazvombo Admire S, Jones Rachael S, Rayment Michael, Mughal Nabeela, Azadian Berge, Donaldson Hugo, Davies Gary W, Moore Luke Sp, Aiken Alexander M
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK.
Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK.
Infect Prev Pract. 2021 Sep;3(3):100157. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2021.100157. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
Patient-facing (frontline) health-care workers (HCWs) are at high risk of repeated exposure to SARS-CoV-2.
We sought to determine the association between levels of frontline exposure and likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity amongst HCW.
A cross-sectional study was undertaken using purposefully collected data from HCWs at two hospitals in London, United Kingdom (UK) over eight weeks in May-June 2020. Information on sociodemographic, clinical and occupational characteristics was collected using an anonymised questionnaire. Serology was performed using split SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG lateral flow immunoassays. Exposure risk was categorised into five pre-defined ordered grades. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between being frontline and SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity after controlling for other risks of infection.
615 HCWs participated in the study. 250/615 (40.7%) were SARS-CoV-2 IgM and/or IgG positive. After controlling for other exposures, there was non-significant evidence of a modest association between being a frontline HCW (any level) and SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity compared to non-frontline status (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.84-2.30, =0.200). There was 15% increase in the odds of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity for each step along the frontline exposure gradient (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.00-1.32, =0.043).
We found a high SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG seropositivity with modest evidence for a dose-response association between increasing levels of frontline exposure risk and seropositivity. Even in well-resourced hospital settings, appropriate use of personal protective equipment, in addition to other transmission-based precautions for inpatient care of SARS-CoV-2 patients could reduce the risk of hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection among frontline HCW.
面向患者(一线)的医护人员反复接触严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的风险很高。
我们试图确定一线接触水平与医护人员中SARS-CoV-2血清阳性可能性之间的关联。
采用横断面研究,于2020年5月至6月的八周内,从英国伦敦两家医院的医护人员中特意收集数据。使用匿名问卷收集社会人口学、临床和职业特征信息。采用SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG侧向流动免疫分析法进行血清学检测。接触风险分为五个预先定义的有序等级。在控制其他感染风险后,使用多变量逻辑回归分析来研究一线工作与SARS-CoV-2血清阳性之间的关联。
615名医护人员参与了该研究。250/615(40.7%)的医护人员SARS-CoV-2 IgM和/或IgG呈阳性。在控制其他接触因素后,与非一线状态相比,一线医护人员(任何级别)与SARS-CoV-2血清阳性之间存在适度关联,但证据不显著(比值比1.39,95%置信区间0.84-2.30,P=0.200)。沿着一线接触梯度,每上升一级,SARS-CoV-2血清阳性的几率增加15%(比值比1.15,95%置信区间1.00-1.32,P=0.043)。
我们发现SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG血清阳性率很高,有适度证据表明一线接触风险水平增加与血清阳性之间存在剂量反应关联。即使在资源充足的医院环境中,除了对SARS-CoV-2患者进行住院护理时采取的其他基于传播的预防措施外,适当使用个人防护设备也可以降低一线医护人员医院获得性SARS-CoV-2感染的风险。